“Rate Limit Exceeded” on Twitter.

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

Blue checks aren’t protecting sex workers from X’s porn crackdown​

'I feel like a fool for paying it. I feel fooled by Elon Musk.'​

Morgan Sung@morgan_sung / 7:15 PM EDT•October 13, 2023
Comment
twitter-legacy-verified-removed

Image Credits: Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch

When X (formerly Twitter) launched paid subscription verification, Mistress Rouge, a professional dominatrix, hoped that it would help her advertise to new clients. But paying for the service didn’t protect her from X’s crackdown on explicit content, which is a particularly hard blow for sex workers on the platform who have few options to promote themselves elsewhere.
“It has done basically nothing for my Twitter engagement,” Mistress Rogue told TechCrunch over DM. “I feel like a fool for paying it. I feel fooled by Elon Musk.”

X Premium, the subscription previously called Twitter Blue, was supposed to grant users more than just a blue check mark. For a $7.99 monthly fee, the service promises prioritized rankings, ranking replies from verified users higher than replies from non-verified users. It’s also supposed to give posts that verified users interact with a boost in engagement, according to X’s Help Center.


Under Musk’s leadership, X has become increasingly hostile toward nudity and explicit content. This week, X started flagging NSFW posts as “sensitive material,” as Rolling Stone reported, and restricting flagged accounts to limit their reach. Sex workers said their engagement tanked and their accounts no longer show up in X’s search, even if they weren’t notified about being flagged. In screenshots shared with Rolling Stone and posted online, X told flagged accounts that their posts may be obscured with a warning to prevent people from seeing sensitive content, and that they may also be excluded from the For You and Following timelines, recommended notifications and trends.

Mistress Rogue is one of many sex workers who want to cancel their subscriptions because of the punitive measures X is taking against adult content.
“I thought it would help my engagement but now I feel like it’s a waste of money,” Mistress Rogue continued.

Sex workers were quick to adopt Twitter Blue in hopes that the boost in engagement would shield them from the shadowbanning and disproportionate censorship that they’re typically subject to on social media. Paying for a subscription, even if they didn’t support Musk’s changes to the platform, was essential for many sex workers to avoid being deplatformed.

Twitter was one of the only social media sites that tolerated explicit content, and until Musk’s takeover, it was a thriving hub for sex workers to share resources, find community and promote their services. The site’s culture was heavily influenced by the strippers, adult content creators and full-service escorts who drove both traffic and memes. But now branded as X, the site is becoming less tolerant of nudity, pornography and anything remotely sexual.


The crackdown affected accounts regardless of their X premium subscription. A sex worker who goes by Mara Villana on X warned fellow NSFW creators that her verified account was flagged and restricted. In replies to her post, she speculated that “they are trying to rid the app of SW [sex work] altogether.” Mara Villana did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment.



Twitter allowed consensual pornographic content, but X’s sensitive media policy forbids adult nudity and sexual behavior, which it defines as media “that is pornographic or intended to cause sexual arousal.” The policy applies to full or partial nudity, simulated sex acts and sexual acts depicted by “cartoons, hentai, or anime involving humans or depictions of animals with human-like features.” Under X’s policy, even suggestive imagery is flagged as sensitive media.

Alleria, a dominatrix who subscribes to X Premium, said one of her posts was flagged even though it didn’t contain explicit nudity. The image, which was reviewed by TechCrunch, was a heavily pixelated shot of Alleria’s crotch, which was further obscured by a black bar. In white text over the bar, the image said “NO p*ssy FOR BETA LOSERS.”

“It was the word that triggered it I think, because the nudity is blurred out,” Alleria said. “It’s already censored.”


She said that she’s “not happy” about paying for X Premium because it only boosts views on her replies to other people’s posts, not on her own posts. She had to “go PG rated” with her X content, and only saw a marginal bump in her post views when she started engaging with users outside of the NSFW community.

“I honestly don’t understand why X is targeting porn content on this site when there is dangerous misinformation, racism and bigotry freely flowing from this site,” she said. “You would think targeting consenting adult nude content would be the last thing X should be doing.”

In its hurry to suppress adult content, X is neglecting to moderate the misinformation and violent rhetoric proliferating on the platform.

Misinformation has been rampant on X, particularly in wake of the escalating conflict in Gaza. The European Union has already publicly warned X for failing to stop the dissemination of illegal content and disinformation after the deadly Hamas attacks on Israel. Under the EU’s Digital Service Act, the onus is on large online platforms like X to mitigate “risks to public security” stemming from disinformation. Graphic content purporting to be footage of the violent conflict continues to go viral, despite experts debunking the posts as doctored, fictional or from previous incidents in other regions.


While X spent this week censoring sex workers, other blue check accounts — verified through X Premium — have been driving misinformation about the conflict with little to no consequences.

In his daily threads calling out misinformation on X, BBC journalist Shayan Sardarizadeh consistently debunks claims made by verified accounts, including one who falsely stated that Hamas had launched an airstrike on Israel. The video that the verified account posted was a clip from the video game “Arma 3.”



Alleria warned that banning porn, which is already under scrutiny by government agencies and banned in multiple states, is a “slippery slope” to targeting LGBTQ communities. Porn bans will eventually affect everyone, she said, if governments are granted the power to decide what media consenting adults are allowed to share.

Mistress Alexxxia, an adult content creator, described the increased censorship of sex workers as “digital discrimination.” In a thread about X’s hostility toward NSFW content, she criticized Musk as the “absolute antithesis of free speech.”

“SWers are the guinea pigs used in [the] changing of policy and access to information because the general population doesn’t care or straight up hates us,” she wrote. “*Your* rights vanish next.”

Alleria said she’ll keep paying for X Premium, even if reluctantly, as long as she can still post links to adult sites. Although she’s considered pivoting to Reddit or Bluesky to promote her services, she’s “not giving up on this site yet.”
“I mean Elon is unpredictable. Anything is possible with him,” Alleria said. “But unless he targets posting links to adult content, I’m not worried. Adult content creators adapt.”
 

Lucky_Lefty

Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,534
Reputation
5,724
Daps
115,764
Reppin
Purgatory

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

Slack gets rid of its X integration​

/

If you used the tool to be notified of X posts in Slack, it’s officially gone now.​

By Jay Peters, a news editor who writes about technology, video games, and virtual worlds. He’s submitted several accepted emoji proposals to the Unicode Consortium.

Oct 24, 2023, 6:37 PM EDT|4 Comments / 4 New

An illustration of the Slack logo.

Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge

Slack has retired its integration with X (formerly Twitter) because of X’s API changes introduced earlier this year.

According to Slack, X’s API changes affected the functionality of the integration, which led to the decision to retire it. “Slack’s integration with X relies on access to its API, and changes to that API this spring impacted the integration’s functionality and the services it supports,” Rod Garcia, Slack’s VP of software engineering, said in a statement to The Verge. “The Twitter app for Slack has not been functional since X implemented these changes, so we have removed the app from the small set of customer workspaces that still have it installed. For more information, please see our update on Slack’s feature retirements page.”

Here’s what Slack says on that feature refinements page: “The Twitter app for Slack is no longer available due to upstream API limitations.” However, X posts will “continue to unfurl” if your Slack settings allow that. The page says that the Twitter app has had a “retired” designation as of October 19th.

The retirement means that Slack’s X integration is just one of many useful things relying on X / Twitter data that has gone away because of the changes instituted under Elon Musk’s ownership. In January, X banned third-party apps, which my former colleague Mitchell Clark argued made the site what it is today. When asked for comment, X’s press email replied with its recent standard auto-reply: “Busy now, please check back later.”

Slack’s decision follows last week’s announcement that it would be retiring its status account on X.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080



FORBES
INNOVATIONVENTURE CAPITAL
EDITORS' PICK

Elon Musk’s X Has Started Selling Off Old Twitter Handles For Upwards Of $50,000​

Alex Konrad

Forbes Staff

Senior editor covering venture capital and startups

Follow


https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexko...d-twitter-handles/?sh=211716545bcf#open-web-0

Nov 3, 2023,08:11pm EDT
Elon Musk's X account


GETTY IMAGES

Rumored to be in the works for the past year, the initiative appears to have begun rolling out recently, with email solicitations being sent to potential buyers.​



X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter, appears to have begun ramping up efforts to sell disused user handles, kicking off a program previously signaled by billionaire owner Elon Musk.


Emails obtained by Forbes reveal that a team within the company, known as the @Handle Team, has begun work on a handle marketplace for the purchase of account names left unused by the people who originally registered them. In at least some cases, X/Twitter has emailed solicitations to potential buyers requesting a flat fee of $50,000 to initiate a purchase.


The emails, which Forbes agreed not to publish in their entirety to protect the anonymity of their recipients, came from active X employees and noted that the company recently made updates to its @handle guidelines, process and fees.

An automated response from X’s press email account to Forbes as of publication time said only: “Busy now, please check back later.”


Musk’s company has been rumored to be planning to put such a program into effect for months. As early as November 2022, Musk posted on the social media site that a “vast number” of handles had been taken by “bots and trolls” and that he planned to start “freeing them up next month.” (In response, a user suggested a “Handle Marketplace” where people could sell accounts to each other, with the site pocketing a fee; Forbes couldn’t determine whether such a practice is now in place.)

By the next month, X employees were already discussing the sale of X/Twitter handles, per a January report by The New York Times, with Musk posting that he planned to free up as many as 1.5 billion usernames “soon.” In May, X began purging defunct accounts from its site.

As of Friday evening, X’s username registration policy posted on its website still stated “unfortunately, we cannot release inactive usernames at this time.” Its “inactive account policy,” meanwhile, warned users to log in every 30 days to avoid being considered inactive, but also said X was not currently releasing inactive usernames.

Musk might want to consider using his own service to purchase at least one account soon: @handle itself, which hasn’t posted since 2019. Fittingly, its last post hinted at a relaunch, but its associated website had long since gone defunct.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080
Elon Musk’s X ad revenue reportedly fell $1.5B this year amid boycotts

"We are not Twitter any longer," X exec said.

ASHLEY BELANGER - 12/13/2023, 1:23 PM

Elon Musk’s X ad revenue reportedly fell $1.5B this year amid boycotts

Enlarge

Leon Neal / Staff | Getty Images Europe

235

It's hard to know exactly how dire the financial situation is at Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter). However, insider sources recently revealed to Bloomberg that the social media platform expects to end 2023 with "roughly" $2.5 billion in advertising revenue.

That's "a significant slump from prior years," sources said. It's also about half a billion short of the $3 billion that X executives expected to make in ad sales in 2023, one source said.

Last year, Twitter raked in more than $1 billion in ad revenue per quarter, sources said. But in each of the first three quarters of 2023, X only managed to generate "a little more than $600 million" in ad revenue. Now, the most recent advertiser fallout over antisemitic content on X—estimated in November as triggering a sudden $75 million loss—is still casting a shadow on what could become an even more dismal fourth quarter.

Sources told Bloomberg that advertising earnings comprise 70–75 percent of X's revenue. This suggests that X's total earnings in 2023 will be "roughly $3.4 billion," boosted by subscriptions and data licensing deals, Bloomberg reported.

Joe Benarroch, head of X business operations, told Bloomberg that its report "presents an incomplete view of our entire business, as the sources you’re relying on for information are not providing accurate and comprehensive details."

Benarroch also made it clear that X is no longer interested in being compared to Twitter. According to Bloomberg, Benarroch said that X is an “evolving NEW global business with multiple revenue streams. We are not Twitter any longer and not measuring ourselves by old Twitter metrics—both in revenue and user metrics.”

X did not immediately respond to Ars' request to comment.

Musk beefing with Disney on X

After Musk boosted an antisemitic post on X, he apologized, but he never removed his controversial postand continued antagonizing advertisers that he claimed were "going to kill the company."

Among the major brands pausing advertising on X is Disney, which seems to have particularly offended Musk. He's spent the past week targeting Disney CEO Bob Iger in a series of X posts, calling out Disney for boycotting X. Musk appears particularly frustrated that Disney is advertising on Meta platforms after New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a lawsuit alleging that Facebook and Instagram are "prime locations for predators to trade child pornography and solicit minors for sex."

Last December, Musk was similarly beefing with Apple through a Twitter tirade that Musk admitted later was due to his own "misunderstanding" about Apple's decision-making. That beef didn't seem to impact any of X's other advertiser relationships long-term, but the latest advertiser boycott does not appear that it will be resolved quickly. Musk's continued inflammatory statements about advertisers and the platform's recent decision to reinstate the X account of Sandy Hook shooting-denier Alex Jones could keep advertisers off X. That, as Musk has warned, risks causing serious long-term damage to X as a viable platform.

Although Twitter/X stopped publicly reporting financial data when Musk took over Twitter in 2022, Musk has been transparent about advertiser revenue being down by "roughly 50 percent" throughout 2023. In September, Musk confirmed that things were getting worse, reporting that ad sales were down by 60 percent and blaming groups monitoring hate speech for spooking advertisers off with their #StopToxicTwitter campaign.

Musk has always said that his goal for X is to reduce reliance on advertising by pivoting to subscriptions he hoped would one day comprise half of X's earnings. But X subscriptions are not as popular as planned, sources told Bloomberg. So far, X only has "just over 1 million paying subscribers"—out of hundreds of millions of X users—and X's subscription revenue is "less than $120 million annually," sources said.

X has rarely been profitable, but under Musk, its financial growth so far appears to have been significantly set back. Before Musk took control, Twitter earned more than $5 billion in 2021, Bloomberg reported, and that year Jack Dorsey "set a public goal to reach $7.5 billion in revenue by the end of 2023." That projection makes the current $3.4 billion estimate for 2023 appear especially stark.

As many big brands remain hesitant to advertise on X, the platform is offering deals hoping to attract smaller brands to invest more in the platform.

Generating more ad revenue is crucial not just to meet X's financial goals in 2024 but also to hit Musk's projection of 1 billion monthly X users in 2024. Musk's plan to attract more users largely depends on content creators lured to increase engagement on X by lucrative ad revenue sharing recently launched by the platform.

Creators have already voiced concerns that the current boycott will impact their ability to profit on the platform, and so far, Musk has only said that there's "not much we can do if advertisers boycott or reduce spend on our platform."
 

CopiousX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
11,509
Reputation
3,382
Daps
55,920
When asked for comment, X’s press email replied with its recent standard auto-reply: “Busy now, please check back later.”
This so damn unprofessional . Should've just kept quite:dead:
 

NoMorePie

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
58,446
Reputation
10,417
Daps
210,858
Reppin
Neptune
Why the fukk can't I see tweets anymore. I gotta click on it now just to go see it on twitter

It just shows the "it's loading* prompt or whatever it is. Whole ass threads with nothing but embedded tweets no longer loading
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

Japanese disaster prevention X account can’t post anymore after hitting API limit​

Sayem Ahmed

❘ Published: Jan 01, 2024, 05:39 ❘ Updated: Jan 01, 2024, 05:39

Nerv app Japan logo on a background from an image posted on the service
NERV

Japanese disaster prevention app NERV can’t post after reaching X’s API limitation. The issue has arisen after major Tsunami warnings have been issued in areas of Japan following a strong earthquake.

Japan has ordered evacuations across several prefectures following a strong earthquake, which reached a magnitude of 7.6 in the Noto area of the Ishikawa prefecture. Following this, warnings of waves as high as 5m have been issued, with residents ordered to evacuate immediately.



Tsunami warnings on the NErv Twitter account
X: @EN_NERV

Neighboring prefectures have also received warnings, with much of Japan’s West coast under an advisory evacuation advisory. Disaster prevention account “NERV” offers warnings of earthquakes and disaster reporting, with the account keeping Japanese residents informed in both English and Japanese languages on X.

Now, the app is facing significant API rate limitations due to new policies put forward under Elon Musk’s ownership of the platform. It can no longer post updates to its combined following of over two million users.

According to Unseen Japan, NERV is under X’s “Basic” API plan, where it can post 100 posts in 24 hours. This costs around $100, while the next step up requires users to pay around $5000 a month for usage of its API. Due to NERV running at a loss, the company has chosen not to subscribe to the higher tier.





An app-based alternative​

Luckily, the creators of the NERV App, Gehirn Inc, have created an app-based alternative for users to get information in real-time, as well as running a Mastodon account. But, that has not stopped some users asking Elon Musk to lift API restrictions for the NERV app. These calls have even reached the ears of Japanese X employee Ryuji M, Director of Next at X in Japan and Korea.




NERV offers highly accurate information for disaster prevention and X offers a quick way to see updated information in a centralized location during these events. But, since X’s new API limitations have hit the platform, it appears that for now, users might have to look elsewhere for the potentially life-saving information.

Dexerto's Hardware Editor. Sayem is an expert in all things Nvidia, AMD, Intel, and PC components. He has 10 years of experience, having written for the likes of Eurogamer, IGN, Trusted Reviews, Kotaku, and
[/SIZE]
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

Twitter/X brings back headlines on link previews but now they’re tiny [Gallery]​



Ben Schoon | Jan 2 2024 - 9:25 am PT


x-fi-1.jpg

X, the platform better known as Twitter, removed headlines from posts with links a few months ago, but is now bringing them back in a new format.

Rolling out now to Twitter/X’s web client, any posts that have a link preview now show more than just a preview image and the name of the website. Previews now include the headline of the article (or title of the webpage) being linked, but in a very small format.

The preview shows up as white text on a black box in the bottom left corner of the image preview. It replaces the name of the website being linked, which has now been moved to a new line between the link preview and the buttons for reply, repost, and like. The small size of the preview, though, doesn’t work well for all headlines. Anything more than a few words is cut off on the default size, and the problem only gets worse on more narrow views.

The change is, so far, only showing up on the web, but presumably, it’ll expand to the iOS app soon. Twitter/X’s Android app, meanwhile, never stopped showing headlines in their original format.

Twitter/X originally removed headlines in August as Elon Musk pushed for publishers to post directly on the platform. But in November, right after a context-less post from Musk showcased the problem with removing headlines from previews, Musk announced that headlines would return.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

X Is Considering Removing Likes And Reposts From Content, Says Musk​



Kirthana K


Last updated: 7 March 2024 9:24 AM

Kirthana K

2 Min Read

X Is Considering Removing Likes And Reposts From Content, Says Musk

SHARE

Social Media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, is considering removing the option to show likes and reposts from all posts on the platform. During the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom 2024 conference, Elon Musk mentioned that X might make several changes, which includes adding a money transfer feature. It was also noted that X is just a few months away from receiving an approval for a money transmitter license in New York.

While it will take time to get an approval from New York, X is just a month or so away from receiving the money transmitter license in California. Musk started the process of acquiring the licenses from California and New York beforehand, since these states are known for their extensive and lengthy approval process. Pennsylvania and Utah have already granted the license to X to start up their money transfer feature. Now all that is left is to get the license approval from other states, after which users can look forward to transferring money to other users while using the X platform.

Besides adding the money transfer feature, Musk did add a views option, where users can spot the number of views per post. Besides this, once the likes and repost feature is removed, the X platform will have a more seamless experience. Musk’s ultimate goal is to reduce information that could visually clutter content on the platform

If you like this post you can check out our other articles like ‘Balatro’ surpasses 500k copies sold in 10 days and Helldivers 2 Latest Update Fixes Armor Rating Values Bug – Update 01.000.100 Patch Notes (6 March)
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,356
Reputation
8,042
Daps
152,080

Fewer people are using Elon Musk’s X as the platform struggles to attract and keep users, according to analysts​

X usage has declined as downloads of Threads have surged in recent weeks.

Workers install lighting on an X sign atop the company headquarters, formerly known as Twitter, in downtown San Francisco, on July 28, 2023.

Workers install lighting on an "X" sign atop the company headquarters in downtown San Francisco, in 2023.Noah Berger / AP file


March 22, 2024, 9:00 PM UTC

By David Ingram

The number of people using X daily is falling, more than a year after tech billionaire Elon Musk bought the app formerly known as Twitter.

Data from two research firms and figures published by Musk and X suggest a deteriorating situation for X by some metrics. Musk has marketed it as the world’s “town square,” but in number of users it continues to lag far behind social media rivals that focus on video, such as Instagram and TikTok.

In February, X had 27 million daily active users of its mobile app in the U.S., down 18% from a year earlier, according to Sensor Tower, a market intelligence firm based in San Francisco. The U.S. user base has been flat or down every month since November 2022, the first full month of Musk’s owning the app, and in total it’s down 23% since then, Sensor Tower said.

The numbers were nearly as bad worldwide, as daily active users on the mobile app fell to 174 million in February, down 15% from a year earlier, the firm said. The worldwide user base has been flat or down every month during Musk’s tenure began except one, when it grew slightly in October and then resumed falling, according to Sensor Tower.

Other social media apps experienced modest increases in their worldwide user bases during the same period, according to the research, with Snapchat growing 8.8%, Instagram 5.3%, Facebook 1.5% and TikTok 0.5%. Those apps all experienced declines over that period in the U.S., but none was as steep as the decline on X.

X had “the most material decline in active users compared to its peers,” Abe Yousef, a senior insights analyst at Sensor Tower, wrote in a research report.

“This decline in X mobile app active users may have been driven by user frustration over flagrant content, general platform technical issues, and the growing threat of short-form video platforms,” he wrote.

Under Musk’s ownership, X has relaxed content moderation rules that previously limited hateful content, such as white supremacist imagery, and Musk has welcomed back to the platform some users whom the old Twitter management had banned. In December, he reinstated the accounts of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his Infowars website and then held a public audio-only event with Jones.

X said in a post Monday that the worldwide number is higher than what Sensor Tower data shows, with 250 million people using X every day globally. That would still be a decrease from when Musk bought the app. Musk said in 2022 that, at about the time he completed the purchase in late October, Twitter had about 258 million “monetizable daily active users,” the company’s metric at the time.

X didn’t respond to a request for additional information. It didn’t say how it defines who counts as an active user — a metric that by its name may appear straightforward but that tech platforms define differently.

On a monthly basis, X has 550 million people using it, according to the company. That figure represents growth of 1.5% since July, when Musk said X had 542 million monthly users.

Sensor Tower defines a daily active user as someone who “registered a session of at least two seconds in length, once in that day.” It says its data comes from a panel of consumers who provide access to their information in exchange for the use of other apps, including apps that track screen time.

Advertisers have also left X, Sensor Tower said, with 75 out of the top 100 U.S. advertisers on X from October 2022 having ceased ad spending on it. The exodus spiked toward the end of last year, after Musk publicly embraced an antisemitic conspiracy theory and told advertisers at a conference in New York, “Go f--- yourself.”

In recent days, Musk has urged his 177 million followers on X to get more people onto the platform. On Sunday, he posted instructions for how to share posts with friends, a basic function of social media.

“Please send links from this platform to your friends who are still being misled by the legacy media!” he wrote in a separate post Sunday.

Musk has also shifted the platform’s business model from being almost entirely ad-supported to one that also has four subscription tiers, from free to a Premium+ service that starts at $16 a month.

Sensor Tower said that, according to its research, X’s revenue from in-app purchases last month was about $9.5 million, including for X subscriptions and payments to creators.

“This still remains just a fraction of revenue that the company was previously generating from advertising in its last year as a public entity,” Yousef wrote. Twitter in July 2022 reported $1.18 billion in revenue for the previous three months.

X has been helped by the lack of a clear text-based social media alternative. Threads, a competitor launched by Instagram and its parent company, Meta, had 1.6 million daily active U.S. mobile users in February, according to Sensor Tower, and 14 million worldwide.

Threads has a potential major advantage over other upstart apps because it is closely integrated with Instagram — users of Instagram can see Threads posts in their feeds and create accounts relatively easily. That has translated into a whopping disparity in downloads, according to a second research firm, Apptopia, based in Boston, which said Threads beat X in downloads worldwide by an 8-to-1 ratio in February.

Downloads were even more lopsided in the U.S. in February, with Threads getting about 16 downloads for every one download of X, Apptopia said.

“For microblogging platforms, X had dominant market share of app downloads right up until Threads launched,” Tom Grant, vice president of research at Apptopia, wrote in an email. “That turned market share completely on its head.”

There were 2.9 million downloads of X in the U.S. in February, up 14% from a year earlier but still below the 3.7 million in October 2022, the month Musk bought the company, according to Apptopia. Threads had 46.2 million downloads last month, Apptopia said.

Threads has ranked highly in some app store rankings lately, topping Apple’s chart for free apps Sunday and staying in the Top 4 for most of this week. X ranked No. 34 on the Apple app store Sunday and No. 30 on Friday. On Friday, Threads ranked No. 7 in Google’s Play store and X ranked No. 43.

But so far, the downloads haven’t translated into sustained growth for Threads, according to Sensor Tower. Another X competitor, Bluesky, was even smaller, with 195,000 U.S. daily active mobile users in February, according to the research firm.

In its own data summary published Monday, X said that “1.7 million people join X every day.” That number is roughly triple the number of daily X downloads worldwide, according to Apptopia, and it suggests that X is growing at a rate of nearly 10% per month — far faster than any other source indicates.
 
Top