newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
did the cops have probable cause or they dont need a reason to stop n search your sh!t?
Look at a map....find this town.........................and then explain how this is a "border" checkpoint...... ??
did the cops have probable cause or they dont need a reason to stop n search your sh!t?
thats bs so this your man 50 grand and he protect you and yall knew each other and blah blah blah and he didnt tell you he gonna make a move it dont happen like that. My ***** would be like yo check im doing such and such is it good let me know something and you ok it or not. A dude that respect you wont just do no bs like that cause real talk it probly not the first time **** happen just first time gettin knocked.
Look at a map....find this town.........................and then explain how this is a "border" checkpoint...... ??
it's a checkpoint on the I-10. to the west the I-10 gets pretty close to the border. if someone were to get something across the border there, and head east on the I-10, they would run into this checkpoint
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-on-ter...miles-of-mexico-or-canada-border-1186515.html
You Have No Constitutional Rights If You Live Within 100 Miles Of Mexico Or Canada Border
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 23:34
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just sued an environmental report on its enhanced security plan to cover an area extending from the East Coast to the West Coast, from the northern border of the United States to 100 miles south of the border. While there are few specifics on the new security measures, the environmental report offers enough to see how we will be protected against threats to national security coming from Canada. The Department of Homeland security will enhance efforts and technologies to reduce the danger from "known terrorist affiliates and extremist groups [that] have an undisputed presence along the Northern Border in both the United States and Canada." Northern Border Security Programs, p. 1-3, September 2011 (Northern Border) (Image: thelastminute)
In 2006 the American Civil Liberties Union exposed the expansion of border control activities to within 100 miles of any point on the U.S. border. ACLU labeled this area the Constitution Free Zone. Search and seizure options at border checkpoints are not constrained by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Now, thanks to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), just because they're within 100 miles of the nearest border nearly 200 million citizens are subject to searching and procedures that previously were used exclusively at border checkpoints.
What do they have in store for citizens on the northern border?
Some highlights of the program include: checkpoints far from the border (but within the 100-mile limit); increased patrol activity; remote video surveillance system systems; upgraded surveillance and telecommunications systems; high-powered X-ray machines of various kinds; and fencing or vehicle barriers at selected points along the border.
The new and improved "High-Energy X-Ray Imaging Scanners" (Northern Border, p. 2-12) expand national security radiation exposure from airline passengers to the much broader audience of drivers and their families, for example, who choose to visit and return from Canada, as well as those who choose to visit the United States from Canada, and anyone unlucky enough to drive into a checkpoint in the Constitution Free Zone.
Buried within the report was this findings, DHS asserts that even though "exposure to high levels of radiation would increase a person's probability of developing cancer and hereditary genetic damage," (Northern Border, 8-13-10, p. 201), the impacts of this program will be "negligible." One wonders if their analysis has considered the kids sitting in the back seat of the car, protected by nothing more than that back seat and their clothing, while a CBP agents X-rays the car's trunk with a mobile device. It's hard to feel warm and fuzzy about impacts being negligible when you can't see any analysis to support that assertion.
....on the border though.......that's not the border...that's Texas........ apparently, all these "puffing" artist haven't been keeping up with alternative media........
you don't know what a 50 pack or a 100 pack is breh?What the fukk you talking about
you don't know what a 50 pack or a 100 pack is breh?
obviously you haven't dealt with real weight before which is not an insult or downplayyou can tell muhfukkas aint ever touch no work,seen no work, or if they have, it was back in the 90's smh..........a whole thang of loud in Orlando goes for 3 stacks AT LEAST.......depending on what it is............you MUST be smoking bap if its 2 or lower smh........reggie bush ass nikkas smh.....................................and did somebody say "with insurance?" please elaborate what "with insurance means?"
I think my post below should explain it all pretty well to youI know what you saying but u must not know what I meant