Random NBA Observations 2017 - 2018
- Thread starter Big Jo
- Start date
No idea of what the fukk you're talking about. It's hilarious since the Celtics have the best record in the league you end up having to resort to some blatant lies to take away from Kyrie's game, because you can't use it to claim it's the cause of them losing. You started off with saying Kyrie's a "role player" and he needs to do more at the start of the season, when he was actively playing within the offense (more than he should've been), and as soon as he starts generating a little bit offense for himself (offense that the team needs) while being efficient, you shift the narrative again.
Pathetic.
street heat
merchant of death
People really trying to throw everything on Russy not even watching the games
there is plenty of blame to go around. donovan has got to decide on a damn rotation this is ridiculous. hes all over the place and does not seem to make adjustments during the game. when the thunder start hot, other teams make adjustments and get back in the game. he never counters with anything.
someone has got to do something about roberson.
grant and patterson should not play with each other
heustis should play... in fact he's played much better than patterson this year. he's very active and good decision maker
i like melo with 2nd unit better than PG. PG handles the ball too much when it should be felton.
Tony D'Amato
It's all about the inches
Wes Johnson has played like he belongs in the nba the last 2 gms
@the breh knowing better being my co worker 
Kiyoshi-Dono
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 86,058
- Reputation
- 32,381
- Daps
- 462,148
- Reppin
- Petty Vandross.. fukk Yall
My amazement at Boston's poiseis matched only by my disgust in pretty much everything about OKC right now
This is how much of a dishonest rockbrain you are for trying to blame Kyrie for Tatum having "no rhythm" for the rest of the half -
Tatum only played six minutes of the first quarter, in those six minutes he touched the ball 7-8 times out of the 12-13 possessions (a number of those touches he moved the ball on for a teammate to get a better shot), had one shot, and one turnover. Basically, he was involved in the offense during the six minutes he was on the floor. When Tatum came back into the game at the start of the 2nd quarter, he was missing shots when Kyrie was on the bench.
Tatum was missing shots, simply because he was missing shots, it had nothing to do with Kyrie not involving him in the six minutes they played together in the first quarter.
It's even more hilarious that you always try to point out how the Celtics go on runs when Kyrie's on the bench, and yet you ignore the fact the Pacers went on a run when Kyrie was on the bench in the 2nd quarter, then you try to claim that the Celtics were down in the first half because Kyrie took too many shots, when his "shots" (15 points on 6/12 shots) were actually the main reason why the Celtics were able to cut the margin down to single digits, after the Pacers took a 13-point lead when he was on the bench.
I bet if Kyrie didn't take those "shots" in the first half and the Celtics were down by more points, you'd be back to calling him a "role player", and that he doesn't deserve to be in the MVP discussion because his numbers aren't good enough.
I bet if Kyrie didn't take those "shots" in the first half and the Celtics were down by more points, you'd be back to calling him a "role player", and that he doesn't deserve to be in the MVP discussion because his numbers aren't good enough.
Kyrie's in my top 5 for MVP.
Last edited:
