Random NBA Observations 2015 - 2016

[Dillah810]

Because some of them should of never changed them in the 1st place. I like the minimalist approach.

It looks better than the current logo, teams are looking for more streamlined less cartoony logos.

That looks horrible by comparison. With the sleeved jerseys shyt like that logo above looks horrible, more simplified looking logos are better IMO.

I can understand going more towards a minimalistic design, but that 1980s era logo is even bad for that time. That shyt is Microsoft Word clipart bad.

These are some minimalist logos that look 10x better than that bullshyt

or this for a full rebranding campaign.

Hell even this is better i you want something that looks similar to old brand.

 

[Malta]

I can understand going more towards a minimalistic design, but that 1980s era logo is even bad for that time. That shyt is Microsoft Word clipart bad.

I think it looks fine, consider that it's probably going to be on the side of the shorts. Most teams go with their team name or city name on the jersey now, very few have actual logos and when they do they look clean like the Warriors or the Bucks. If that's on their jersey, it'll be center of the chest with the number above or below it without any other writing.

 

[LinusCaldwell]

JC and Kosher talk about the impact Prince had on the music community and how a lot of these people who are saying RIP Prince do not even really know who he is. Beyoncé dropped and the world stopped, Lemonade the hottest thing in the streets and Drake has to be on the lookout because JC thinks Drake with Views from the 6 is about to get washed in Beyoncé's latest album. Kosher and JC dissect the NBA playoffs and JC gives his case on how Harden is the best NBA SG in town and how the Warriors are looking funny in the light after their historic season.

www.fteswl.com subscribe and support, thank you!

 

[He Who Posts Well]

I can understand going more towards a minimalistic design, but that 1980s era logo is even bad for that time. That shyt is Microsoft Word clipart bad.

These are some minimalist logos that look 10x better than that bullshyt

or this for a full rebranding campaign.

Hell even this is better i you want something that looks similar to old brand.

Dat branding

 

[DoubleClutch]

The Cavs did not show their full potential during the regular season

 

[CrimsonTider]

what is this chart based off of? Warriors having such a shot selection efficiency is off because curry's shots are by no means good shot selection regardless of them going in.

Steph shot selection is good for STEPH.

You can base his shot selection on what you are accustom to

 

[Lootpack]

 

[CarltonJunior]

It's about time

 

[Draje]

Are Iggy and Livingston one of the scariest "one, two punch" combo when it comes to bench squads?

These dudes are consistently excellent and can match most starting players in the leagues. Ungodly high basketball IQ, great vision, versatile enough to fit with any unit they want to run, and they just bully most benches.

shyt, I still feel like Iggy is among the more talented players in the league and could be the third option on a championship squad. That playmaking, passing, IQ, defense, and leadership...

 

[<<TheStandard>>]

We need someone skilled in math & stat to give us a line on GS/Clippers w/o Curry. I'm assuming Clips -125 to -150? (Clips 55%-60% chance)


What do y'all think?

@Absolut

 

[CSquare43]

Dirk luv the kids.....

 

[Rigby.]

'Nobody gets a ring for sweeping the Pistons, who won 44 games to earn the No. 8 seed in the East. It is worth noting, though, that 44 wins were good enough for the No. 5 seed in the West, and the Pistons are a feisty young team that was desperate to take something from the Cavs, and still could not."

I wish more haters sat down and realized how good the East was this year from a regular season and competitive standpoint. Playing close with the Pistons as you try to get in a playoff groove is nothing to be ashamed of. I also think the Pistons would probably beat the Clippers based on the fact that they could offset hack a Drummond with fouling Jordan. So at the very least, Cleveland just played a team almost as good as the fourth best squad in the West in their first round.

 

[jaguar paw]

'Nobody gets a ring for sweeping the Pistons, who won 44 games to earn the No. 8 seed in the East. It is worth noting, though, that 44 wins were good enough for the No. 5 seed in the West, and the Pistons are a feisty young team that was desperate to take something from the Cavs, and still could not."

I wish more haters sat down and realized how good the East was this year from a regular season and competitive standpoint. Playing close with the Pistons as you try to get in a playoff groove is nothing to be ashamed of. I also think the Pistons would probably beat the Clippers based on the fact that they could offset hack a Drummond with fouling Jordan. So at the very least, Cleveland just played a team almost as good as the fourth best squad in the West in their first round.

The Pistons were one of the only teams to beat down a fully healthy and rested Warriors team this season.

SVG was arguably the best coach going into the Eastern Playoffs. They shouldn't hang their heads at all in regards to how it played out.

 

[duckbutta]

Reporter : Kawhi...when the power went out during the game in Memphis, was it hard for you to get back in rhythm when the game started again

Kawhi: Nah. I was on the bench when it happened.

 

[Absolut]

We need someone skilled in math & stat to give us a line on GS/Clippers w/o Curry. I'm assuming Clips -125 to -150? (Clips 55%-60% chance)


What do y'all think?

@Absolut

id still rate warriors as the better team, even sans curry. very slightly. id be at the high end of your price range, with the warriors the fave. game 1 price around 5.5/6, and zig zagging from there. tough series price to make with such a big element being completely up in the air