tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,352
Reputation
9,114
Daps
206,635
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP

:wow: These brehs so happy to win


The Sixers have more wins than my team.

The Sixers have more wins than my team.

Let that marinate for a little bit.

The Sixers have more wins than my team.

I'm trying like hell not to go off on y'all clowning Rubio, but I can't recall a player meaning THIS much to a team in a while. By the time he returns they will have lost 23 straight. 23!
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
80,520
Reputation
10,167
Daps
215,787
Because they were offering a ton of cap relief. If I remember correctly, the Lakers were really only trying hard to deal him for :flabbynsick: injured players like Bynum and Okafor that could have saved them like $20 million because they weren't playing and insurance would have covered their deals. Pau's financial cost to Phoenix or Cleveland would have been enormous and he could have walked away at the end of the year. They had no reason to load the Lakers up with picks. They would have been doing the Lakers a favor by taking Pau and they knew it.

If the Lakers were willing to trade him for guys that actually would have stayed on the payroll at tax time and/or players that more time left on their deals, some playoff team would have thrown in some draft picks for him.
Pau is a game changer. Teams weren't offering shyt for him and LA was right to hold out for a fair deal. What deals did you hear about other than Phoenix offering a single first rounder?

No reason a team on the verge shouldn't have been aggressive in trading for him if they wanted to win it all or make a serious run.
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,160
Reputation
985
Daps
44,238
Pau is a game changer. Teams weren't offering shyt for him and LA was right to hold out for a fair deal. What deals did you hear about other than Phoenix offering a single first rounder?

No reason a team on the verge shouldn't have been aggressive in trading for him if they wanted to win it all or make a serious run.
One draft pick is better than letting him walk for nothing... Should have traded him to Houston in 2012 when they offered Dragic, picks and Scola.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,352
Reputation
9,114
Daps
206,635
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
Pau is a game changer. Teams weren't offering shyt for him and LA was right to hold out for a fair deal. What deals did you hear about other than Phoenix offering a single first rounder?

No reason a team on the verge shouldn't have been aggressive in trading for him if they wanted to win it all or make a serious run.

The last 2-3 years gave you no indication of that. What he gets paid now reflects what teams thought he could contribute. It's hard to give up assets with the rationale being "well maybe all of the sand is out of his vagina by now :manny:"
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
80,520
Reputation
10,167
Daps
215,787
The last 2-3 years gave you no indication of that. What he gets paid now reflects what teams thought he could contribute. It's hard to give up assets with the rationale being "well maybe all of the sand is out of his vagina by now :manny:"
He'd been used wrong for over three years. :yeshrug:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,130
Reputation
1,360
Daps
37,295
Reppin
Los Angeles
Pau is a game changer. Teams weren't offering shyt for him and LA was right to hold out for a fair deal. What deals did you hear about other than Phoenix offering a single first rounder?

No reason a team on the verge shouldn't have been aggressive in trading for him if they wanted to win it all or make a serious run.
It was fine for the Lakers to hold out for more but it's no surprise they didn't get what they were looking for. Not many teams had $15-$20 mil in expirings and it seemed like the Lakers were more interested in getting dead wood that they could waive or get insurance coverage for so they could get out of the tax. They had a very limited number of teams to deal with. If they wanted draft picks, they could have had that. if they wanted cap relief they could have had that. They went for both and teams either couldn't provide that or just didnt want to.

Lets put it this way, how many teams out there would have given multiple picks for Mozgov?
 

who_better_than_me

Time to go!!
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
26,551
Reputation
1,162
Daps
40,153
Reppin
NULL
Almost half way though the season and the mavs have played majority of their games against the eastern conference and are barely above .500 against western conference teams.


They wont maintain their seeding in the top 4
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,078
Reputation
9,372
Daps
230,061
Over my head :mjlol: That's precious.

Sorry dummy, you cant use that stat to defend Kyrie then ignore it to shyt on the two guys right below him.
It wasn't meant for you, that's half of the reason why it went over your head, dummy.

Besides there's caveats with all those metrics, as I've mentioned countless times before (team mates they play alongside, relievers, bench personnel etc etc) but the fact remains - both Paul and Harden are recognized as the leaders of their team and are recognized as holding their team together, whereas Kyrie isn't looked at in the same manner (and no this is not me saying he's more important to the team than LeBron). This is me saying to dudes that believe he's a cancer to the team, that he doesn't his team mates better (there's no such thing), that he isn't a 'real' PG (again, there's no such thing) and that he's overrated (which I don't really understand since nobody calls him the best PG in the league), that they're WRONG.

Second of all - I've praised both Paul and Harden for how they've performed this season (besides that one thread that tried to state that Harden was definitively the leading MVP candidate at that specific time where he had been shooting between 37-40% for most of the season and the fact that Curry, Gasol and Davis had better arguments than he did). And show me exactly where I've used that particular offensive metric and #s from this season to shyt on those two?
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
975
Daps
106,199
It wasn't meant for you, that's half of the reason why it went over your head, dummy.

Besides there's caveats with all those metrics, as I've mentioned countless times before (team mates they play alongside, relievers, bench personnel etc etc) but the fact remains - both Paul and Harden are recognized as the leaders of their team and are recognized as holding their team together, whereas Kyrie isn't looked at in the same manner (and no this is not me saying he's more important to the team than LeBron). This is me saying to dudes that believe he's a cancer to the team, that he doesn't his team mates better (there's no such thing), that he isn't a 'real' PG (again, there's no such thing) and that he's overrated (which I don't really understand since nobody calls him the best PG in the league), that they're WRONG.

Second of all - I've praised both Paul and Harden for how they've performed this season (besides that one thread that tried to state that Harden was definitively the leading MVP candidate at that specific time where he had been shooting between 37-40% for most of the season and the fact that Curry, Gasol and Davis had better arguments than he did). And show me exactly where I've used that particular offensive metric and #s from this season to shyt on those two?
Obviously you've never USED it to shyt on them because that that would be impossible. I clearly said you ignored it, along with every other measurable statistic that confirms Chris Paul and James Harden as two of the best players in the league, whist carrying on your silly tirades against them the past several years. This is what happens when you form your opinions first and then cherry pick stats, charts, quotes and various other tidbits after the fact to bolster them.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,335
Reputation
575
Daps
16,044
Obviously you've never USED it to shyt on them because that that would be impossible. I clearly said you ignored it, along with every other measurable statistic that confirms Chris Paul and James Harden as two of the best players in the league, whist carrying on your silly tirades against them the past several years. This is what happens when you form your opinions first and then cherry pick stats, charts, quotes and various other tidbits after the fact to bolster them.

What do you mean, though? Gil Scott will admit that CP3 is >>> Kyrie :JJ:



Right ... :JJ:
 
Top