After Clinton had set the precedent, George W. Bush followed suit. Shortly after being inaugurated Bush asked for the resignations of all the U.S. attorneys appointed under Clinton. Bush didn't face as severe criticism at the time, but he incited public outrage at the start of his second term after firing seven attorneys, an act that was viewed as an attempt to politicize the Justice Department.
'You're fired': Experts confirm Trump's dismissal of 46 U.S. attorneys was totally normal
The Washington Post laid it out
like this: "Although Bush and President Bill Clinton each dismissed nearly all U.S. attorneys upon taking office, legal experts and former prosecutors say the firing of a large number of prosecutors in the middle of a term appears to be unprecedented and threatens the independence of prosecutors."
Former acting attorney general Stuart Gerson, meanwhile,
wrote that it "is customary for a President to replace U.S. Attorneys at the beginning of a term. Ronald Reagan replaced every sitting U.S. Attorney when he appointed his first Attorney General. President Clinton, acting through me as Acting AG, did the same thing, even with few permanent candidates in mind." (Hat tip on this and the Post piece to
TPM.)
David Burnham
told NPR that what happened this time around "is close to unprecedented." He added this: "Now, that being said, when a president comes into office, historically, all the U.S. attorneys leave. And he appoints a new set of these individuals — there are about 90 of them…And they can be very powerful and influential in deciding which cases are prosecuted and which kinds of cases are not."
McClatchy explained it
like this: "Mass firings of U.S. attorneys are fairly common when a new president takes office, but not in a second-term administration. Prosecutors are usually appointed for four-year terms, but they are usually allowed to stay on the job if the president who appointed them is re-elected."
They added: "Even as they planned mass firings by the Bush White House, Justice Department officials acknowledged it would be unusual for the president to oust his own appointees. Although Bill Clinton ordered the wholesale removal of U.S. attorneys when he took office to remove Republican holdovers, his replacement appointees stayed for his second term."
So Is This U.S. Attorney Purge Unprecedented Or Not?
------------
Get your light weight Republican shyt out of here. You're not the only one who can google. But you're the only dumbass that doesn't understand what you're communicating.