Prequels (and interquels) generally suck

Nuke Dukem

Da Bears
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
4,333
Reputation
37
Daps
13,288
Reppin
Windy City
Temple of Doom was only a prequel because Lucas didn't want Nazis to be villains again from what I heard. It wasn't really conceptualized to be a prequel like most of the ones we see.

I haven't gotten into that yet but I look at that a bit differently because that's actually a character I'd want to have more screen time. Still I don't see why they couldn't make his series a sequel as well because he was fine after Breaking Bad. In fact I remember watching the first episode and it was taking place in parts after Breaking Bad.
They couldn't really do it about after BB, because that storyline only has one way to go... In the first episode they flashed forward alluding to showing us what happens...
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,607
I agree, I never care much for prequels.

Do that shyt in a flashback or something instead of wasting money on what could of been a sequel. :what:
 
Last edited:

Rapmastermind

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
10,661
Reputation
3,328
Daps
39,535
Reppin
New York City
Batman Begins is a reboot. Godfather II is a sequel with flashbacks. Real prequels are writers taking undefined pieces of backstory and giving them a full treatment after the fact. That full treatment is basically just filler because you know how it begins and you know how it ends so what happened between isn't really that important and like I said you find whole characters and plot threads in prequels that were written after the original was made that aren't referenced in the original because they didn't exist.

Prequels are like Naruto filler. And Darth Vader's backstory didn't need to be told. It ended up being a direct assault on the character demystifying him and eroding the full appeal of the character. We find out he was an annoying hothead that didn't listen to anybody and generally was an unlikable a$$hole. Why did we need to know all that again?

I agree to an extent but just because it's told in a flashback doesn't mean it wasn't a prequel. "The Godfather" was the end of the Don's life, obviously that wasn't the "Beginning" of the story we just came into that way. I think "Last Crusade" had prequel elements showing Indy as a teenager. "The Indiana Jones Chronicles" was clearly a prequel told in flashbacks as well. I agree with you that sometimes that backstory is left better untold. But what I noticed most is only Iconic Characters or stories get the Prequel treatment. "The Lord of the Rings" is the Sequel to "The Hobbit" from a story standpoint and on film. So that would make "The Hobbit" Trilogy prequels but the "Hobbit" books came out first. Again the key here is "Backstory". The thing with "Batman Begins" is that if Nolan never made another film, you could place the Burton film right after it because the ending scene is Batman holding a joker card. So yes "Reboots" are getting more well defined but when Nolan first did it one could say it was still a prequel based story since it was Batman's origin or "Backstory/Beginning".


Complications
Sometimes "prequel" describes followups where it is not always possible to apply a label defined solely in terms of intertextuality.[7] In the case of The Godfather Part II, the narrative combines elements of a prequel with those of a more generalized sequel by having two intercut narrative strands, one continuing from the first film (the mafia family story under the leadership of Michael Corleone), and one, completely separate, detailing events that precede it (the story of his father Vito Corleone in his youth). In this sense the film can be regarded as both a "prequel and a sequel" (i.e., both a prior and a continuing story), and is often referred to in this manner.[7]

In the original Planet of the Apes series, even though the latter three films depict events chronologically prior to those of the first two films, the narrative itself is continuous, as three characters from the first two films go back in time. The later installments (Escape from...,[8] Conquest of...,[9][10] and Battle for...[11]) are sometimes called "prequels" in a broad sense of the word, and they are also sequels defined both broadly (as later installments) and narrowly (as continuation of the previously established storyline).[1]

In recent times the term "prequel" has also been applied to origin-story reboots, such as Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Batman Begins, and Casino Royale.[12][13] The creators of both Batman Begins and Rise of the Planet of the Apes also stated their intent to dispense with the continuity of the previous films so they would exist as separate pieces of work, with Christopher Nolan—director of Batman Begins—explicitly stating he does not consider it a prequel.[13][14] Here, "prequel" denotes status as a "franchise-renewing original" that depicts events earlier in the (internally inconsistent) narrative cycle than those of a previous installment.[13] Most reviewers require that a prequel must lead up to the beginning of its original work,[3] which is inconsistent with works that dispense with the narrative of previous work and are not significantly within the same continuity.

The 2009 film Star Trek features characters from the 1960s TV series Star Trek, but earlier in their careers. However, the film is set in an alternate timeline caused by a Romulancaptain from the universe of the original series going back in time and interfering with history. Thus, the film has been described as simultaneously a prequel and a reboot.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
45,128
Reputation
3,748
Daps
68,375
Reppin
Michigan
Yeah it's not conceptualzied that way but it still is a prequel. It takes place before the first in the series which makes it a prequel. I don't think the word "prequel" means that the quality will automatically be inferior
It's a prequel because he shuffled the date not because he really wanted to tell backstory. Hell if you aren't paying attention you wouldn't even know it was a prequel.
 

Knicksman20

Superstar
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
16,216
Reputation
4,991
Daps
45,258
Reppin
NY
Only 2 prequels I can think of offhand that I enjoyed. 1 was the Infernal Affairs prequel which showed how both grew up got to the academy (The Departed was a remake of the original). The other is Underworld: Rise of the Lycans off the strength of Michael Sheen's great acting.
 

Rapmastermind

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
10,661
Reputation
3,328
Daps
39,535
Reppin
New York City
Where does X-Men First Class fit in to this? :patrice:


Perfect example why "Reboots" mask themselves when they are really Prequels. "Star Trek 09" did this as well. People are using "Reboots" as a way to really tell a prequel story that starts a partcular property or character at the beginning of their journey. "X-Men: First Class" is the origin story of Professor X and Magento. Technically speaking you have to call this Prequel but it was marketed essually as a "Reboot" of the characters with new young actors showing how they started out as X-Men. As I posted, "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" did this as well. Someone asked me where "Jurassic World" fits in this. Well that's sequel basically posing as a "Reboot". In the Jurassic Park Timeline it takes place 20 years after the original. So It wouldn't qualify as a prequel.

220px-X-MenFirstClassMoviePoster.jpg



220px-Startrekposter.jpg


220px-Rise_of_the_Planet_of_the_Apes_Poster.jpg
 

JahBuhLun

Graphic Alchemist
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
5,958
Reputation
1,447
Daps
21,385
I would like to see a Transformers prequel that takes place exclusively on Cybertron. With no human actors in there fukking it up. A Man of Steel prequel on Krypton telling the story of how Kryptonians basically destroyed their home planet, without Superman.
 

Rapmastermind

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
10,661
Reputation
3,328
Daps
39,535
Reppin
New York City
I would like to see a Transformers prequel that takes place exclusively on Cybertron. With no human actors in there fukking it up. A Man of Steel prequel on Krypton telling the story of how Kryptonians basically destroyed their home planet, without Superman.


There is already a Superman Prequel Television show in the works called "Krypton" being produced and written by David Goyer which focuses on Life before Kal El was born and his father being young. A "Transformers" non-human prequel would be dope. Certain stories in the "Ani-matrix" can be considered a Prequel to the entire "Matrix" Franchise. Like I said, I really want a "Yoda" prequel film that takes place 1,000 years before "Episode I", it doesn't have to tell his entire backstory just show him as young jedi, people would go wild. I was laughing at Ridley Scott swearing for years "Prothemous" techincally wasn't a prequel until everyone saw the film and it was clear as day, lol. Now the next film is called "Alien: Covenant" which is the 2nd film of the new Alien: Prequel Series. Again from a blockbuster/success standpoint Coppola got the fire burning in "Godather II" and Lucas threw gasoline in it with Indiana Jones and Star Wars exploring Origin Stories of legendary characters.

220px-The-animatrix-poster.jpeg


220px-Prometheusposterfixed.jpg



aliencovenantlogobanner.jpg
 
Top