PraegerU megathread - drop all the worst videos they're trying to approve for our schools

[Professor Emeritus]

as long as the left continues to do this (and they're getting exponentially worse), then the Pragers of the world will always have a spot rejecting it, in favor of common sense and biology

you guys think im trying to troll the forum when i point this out, but i truly, only do it because it's a ridiculous, unnecessary achilles heel for this party i don't understand it

You just posted a far-right racist who happens to be lying about his claim, in a thread that has NOTHING to do with the topic, and you think that's not a problem? Before you posted it, did you even fact-check whether both claims were true or not? Or did you just implicitly trust him because the two of you are a lot alike?

I can't even keep track of how many threads you've derailed with this bullshyt, but this is at least the 3rd time recently you've done it with a claim that wasn't even true.


It's annoying as fukk that we can't talk about PraegerU's lies about history, science, and race, without you coming in to derail the thread with your trans obsession.

 

[the cac mamba]

You just posted a far-right racist who happens to be lying about his claim, in a thread that has NOTHING to do with the topic, and you think that's not a problem? Before you posted it, did you even fact-check whether both claims were true or not? Or did you just implicitly trust him because the two of you are a lot alike?

I can't even keep track of how many threads you've derailed with this bullshyt, but this is at least the 3rd time recently you've done it with a claim that wasn't even true.

i get it, breh. you can't admit the left is wrong about anything. but i don't understand why you want to give Prager oxygen, in order to pander to a mentally ill 1% of the country

 

[Professor Emeritus]

i get it, breh. you can't admit the left is wrong about anything. but i don't understand why you want to give Prager oxygen, in order to pander to a mentally ill 1% of the country

Why are you lying again? I've expressed my views on the trans issue before, including that EXACT request you just made, and every time I do, you ignore it and post the same lie in the next thread.

You should also apologize for falsely mischaracterizing my previous replies.

sure. right after you acknowledge that dems look like idiots when they call themselves the party of science, but suddenly forget 'the science' when it comes to this trans nonsense

Agreed. Your turn?

Of course, you ignored me and just kept replying to other people instead, so I posted this:

Look at what he's done in the thread so far:

#23: I point out that "latinx" hasn't been a focus of dems at all

#24: @the cac mamba derails the entire thread topic by lying and claiming the democrats are focused on pronouns and trans issues

#25: I point out to him that Republicans are far more focused on those issues than dems are

#30: @the cac mamba purposely misreads my comment asking, "So you think they're right on the issue?" and continues to focus on it

#31: @chico25 points out that he missed the point entirely

#32: @the cac mamba doubles down

#35: I point out that his response had nothing to do with what I said and he's just deflecting

#59: @the cac mamba ignores everything preceding and makes an incredibly stupid claim about gas prices

#60: I point out how his approach would be completely ignorant, counterproductive, and harmful

#61: @the cac mamba doubles down without even acknowledging my criticisms

#62: I ask if he even read the criticism

#63: @the cac mamba admits having not read it

#64: I pointed out that I write for the benefit of readers and that he's engaged in bad faith posting

#65: @the cac mamba makes false global attacks and demands I answer his question while continuing to ignore the response I already gave

#66: I ask him to address what's already been said first before I respond to new demands

#67: @the cac mamba states that he will once I agree that dems don't "follow the science" on trans issues

#68: I immediate agree and put the ball back in his court

#74: @the cac mamba completely ignores me and response to @TheDarceKnight doubling down on his trans derailment again



Why does he even post in HL, other than to troll and derail threads? Why is he allowed to? Since this thread has started all he's done is lie, derail, and make constant demands of others while refusing to engage with their responses. Every time someone responds to his bullshyt derailments, he ignores their response and just deflects to more bullshyt. What is he adding to the community at all? He's the very definition of a troll.

Of course, you ghosted the thread once I posted that.


This is our typical exchange on this issue. You bring up trans out of nowhere, then lie, get caught, double down, get called out, then ghost. Two days later you do it again in a new thread.

That thread was EIGHTEEN months ago. You've been obsessed with this shyt for the longest. You've taken threads about PraegerU, Dianne Feinstein, Heritage Foundation dismantling government, defund the police, Justice Democrats, and a gay doctor, and deflected them ALL to your trans obsession. And that's just the ones I replied to, I've ignored far more than that.

Do you feel productive to society? At all?

 

[the cac mamba]

Why are you lying again? I've expressed my views on the trans issue before, including that EXACT request you just made, and every time I do, you ignore it and post the same lie in the next thread.









Of course, you ignored me and just kept replying to other people instead, so I posted this:




Of course, you ghosted the thread once I posted that.


This is our typical exchange on this issue. You bring up trans out of nowhere, then lie, get caught, double down, get called out, then ghost. Two days later you do it again in a new thread.

That thread was EIGHTEEN months ago. You've been obsessed with this shyt for the longest. You've taken threads about PraegerU, Dianne Feinstein, Heritage Foundation dismantling government, defund the police, Justice Democrats, and a gay doctor, and deflected them ALL to your trans obsession. And that's just the ones I replied to, I've ignored far more than that.

Do you feel productive to society? At all?

so you're bucking your party good. glad to hear it

i think that dennis prager is a huge fakkit, and i'd laugh if he got hit with a bus. so explain to me why i have to side with dennis prager, over my elected Democrat officials, by saying that men cannot menstruate

 

[Professor Emeritus]

so you're bucking your party good. glad to hear it

STFU, I've said that to you already before when the subject has been brought up, and you ignore it, then claim in the very next argument that I've never criticized the left. This isn't news to you, you just pretend I haven't said it so you can rinse and repeat the same lie next time as a bad faith argument.

i think that dennis prager is a huge fakkit, and i'd laugh if he got hit with a bus. so explain to me why i have to side with dennis prager, over my elected Democrat officials, by saying that men cannot menstruate

You side with Dennis Praeger over a lot more than that. So why bring up shyt that has nothing to do with the thread?

I just posted a Praeger climate change video. You've expressed in the past that you pretty much agree with their basic message there and don't think we should make any changes to combat climate change. So why not just respond to that actual video posted and support it with your incisive, intelligent, well-informed arguments, rather than deflecting to shyt that hasn't even been the subject of any PraegerKids videos?

 

[the cac mamba]

You side with Dennis Praeger over a lot more than that. So why bring up shyt that has nothing to do with the thread?

I just posted a Praeger climate change video. You've expressed in the past that you pretty much agree with their basic message there and don't think we should make any changes to combat climate change.

i've expressed that humans affect climate change. but i don't give a fukk when gas is over 4 dollars a gallon, democrats are doing nothing to ban private jets, and india/china's factory outputs are making your gay little protests irrelevant

please address the fact that 70 percent of america would agree with the above statement please address why it's my problem to fight climate change, when "climate czar" john kerry's jet emits more carbon in one trip than my cadillac does in 5 years. otherwise, shut the fukk up

and don't worry, i've checkmated far worse posters than you before

 

[Professor Emeritus]

i've expressed that humans affect climate change. but i don't give a fukk when gas is over 4 dollars a gallon, democrats are doing nothing to ban private jets, and india/china's factory outputs are making your gay little protests irrelevant

please address the fact that 70 percent of america would agree with the above statement

Two-Thirds of Americans Think Government Should Do More on Climate

Over half of Republicans and overwhelming shares of Democrats say they favor a range of initiatives to reduce the impacts of climate change.

www.pewresearch.org

Most of the other shyt you said was wrong too, but I'm going to leave it with that response because you've proven in the past that you can't/won't read anyway.

please address why it's my problem to fight climate change, when "climate czar" john kerry's jet emits more carbon in one trip than my cadillac does in 5 years. otherwise, shut the fukk up

I don't think John Kerry (or anyone) should use private jets, but so what? You're committing an obvious Tu quoque fallacy, and not even towards the actual person you're arguing with. Whether or not something is the right thing to do is not changed at all by what John Kerry does. Only people who are actually trying to decrease carbon emissions are in a position to criticize Kerry, wtf do you care what he does when you've never done anything yourself?

On every single issue, you can find a hypocrite on the other side. Does that mean you don't have any moral responsibilities of your own at all, you're just going to deflect to others on everything? I wouldn't be surprised if you actually do that, tbh.

 

[the cac mamba]

Two-Thirds of Americans Think Government Should Do More on Climate

Over half of Republicans and overwhelming shares of Democrats say they favor a range of initiatives to reduce the impacts of climate change.

www.pewresearch.org

Most of the other shyt you said was wrong too, but I'm going to leave it with that response because you've proven in the past that you can't/won't read anyway.







I don't think John Kerry (or anyone) should use private jets, but so what? You're committing an obvious Tu quoque fallacy, and not even towards the actual person you're arguing with. Whether or not something is the right thing to do is not changed at all by what John Kerry does. Only people who are actually trying to decrease carbon emissions are in a position to criticize Kerry, wtf do you care what he does when you've never done anything yourself?

On every single issue, you can find a hypocrite on the other side. Does that mean you don't have any moral responsibilities of your own at all, you're just going to deflect to others on everything? I wouldn't be surprised if you actually do that, tbh.

this word salad didn't address the simple, direct questions i asked you. you're the epitome of why democrats can't slam dunk elections where they should

you don't want to beat the republicans. you're more content defending 4 dollar gas and 56 genders. Sad!

 

[Professor Emeritus]

/this word salad didn't address the simple, direct questions i asked you. you're the epitome of why democrats can't slam dunk elections where they should

Just like I said right in the comment, I knew you wouldn't actually read it.



You asked me to address your claim that 70% of Americans don't give a fukk about climate change. I pointed out that your claim was a lie, because the vast majority of Americans actually do care despite the other things you bytch about. That was a direct response to your bad faith question.


You also asked me why you should care about climate change when John Kerry is a bad boy. I pointed out that that is a Tu quoque fallacy and has no relation to what you should do. That was a direct response to your bad faith question.


Then I stated that I was only going to stick with answering two questions because you wouldn't read those answers anyway. And you proved me right.


Now, when are you going to address that your original tweet you started this derailment with was a lie from a far-right idiot? You haven't acknowledged that at all. And the last time you derailed a thread with trans shyt just a couple days ago, THAT was a with lie from a far-right idiot as well, and you never addressed that either.

Do we see a pattern here?

 

[the cac mamba]

Just like I said right in the comment, I knew you wouldn't actually read it.



You asked me to address your claim that 70% of Americans don't give a fukk about climate change. I pointed out that your claim was a lie, because the vast majority of Americans actually do care despite the other things you bytch about. That was a direct response to your bad faith question.


You also asked me why you should care about climate change when John Kerry is a bad boy. I pointed out that that is a Tu quoque fallacy and has no relation to what you should do. That was a direct response to your bad faith question.


Then I stated that I was only going to stick with answering two questions because you wouldn't read those answers anyway. And you proved me right.


Now, when are you going to address that your original tweet you started this derailment with was a lie from a far-right idiot? You haven't acknowledged that at all. And the last time you derailed a thread with trans shyt just a couple days ago, THAT was a with lie from a far-right idiot as well, and you never addressed that either.

Do we see a pattern here?

shills like you are the reason republicans keep it close in winnable swing states

but hey man, keep it close. keep talking about how there are 56 genders, instead of 2. keep talking about how food service workers should just go buy an electric car, while john kerry pilots around on his private jet. you clearly know how to win (in san francisco)

 

[Professor Emeritus]

shills like you are the reason republicans keep it close in winnable swing states

but hey man, keep it close. keep talking about how there are 56 genders, instead of 2. keep talking about how food service workers should just go buy an electric car, while john kerry pilots around on his private jet. you clearly know how to win (in san francisco)

Got caught lying, and instead of acknowledging it, deflects with more lies. What a surprise.

 

[the cac mamba]

Got caught lying, and instead of acknowledging it, deflects with more lies. What a surprise.

what was i incorrect about? are there 2 genders, or 56?

 

[the cac mamba]

pmm

Got caught lying, and instead of acknowledging it, deflects with more lies. What a surprise.

Got caught lying, and instead of acknowledging it, deflects with more lies. What a surprise.

you're weak, soft, and pathetic. i agree with democrats 90 percent of the time, and disagree with them on 4 issues

but you'e such a relentless shill, that you can' 't admit they're wrong on anything

 

[Professor Emeritus]

what was i incorrect about?

* Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust did not demand that people stop using the word "vagina". They just had a glossary of other terms that doctors can use with trans male patients if they prefer.

* PraegerU did not come to prominence by rejecting trans shyt, nor does PraegerU rely on "common sense and biology", as you claimed

* I frequently criticize the left, which you claimed I can't do

* You claimed I give Praeger oxygen in order to pander to "a mentally ill 1% of the country", yet I never did such a thing

* I'm not a democrat, which the democrats here are very well aware of but you keep claiming they're my party

* You claimed that 70% of Americans don't give a fukk about climate change because gas prices, private jets, and India/China. This is provably false, and I did so.

* After I directly addressed your statements, you falsely claimed that I hadn't

* You twice claimed I defended 56 genders, even after we'd already covered that ground and proved you made it up

* You again called me a shill and claimed I can't say they're wrong about anything in the SAME CONVERSATION where I had already quoted myself telling you they're wrong on this very issue.


You're reminding me more and more of Trump, in that you don't seem to have the desire to read anything longer than 2-3 sentences nor the intellectual curiosity to learn or understand anything. You just repeat your same catch phrases and regurgitate the same arguments that right-wing social media feeds you, and think you're a hit.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I don't think John Kerry (or anyone) should use private jets, but so what?

loser shyt