What did Tim Brown do for the majority of his career before that 3 year stretch at the end with Gannon,Jerry Rice and Rison?What argument is there to be had?They ARE HoFers
With the stats he's put up throughout his career you would think his teams were pretty good to elite but they aren't which makes (IMO) those numbers empty. He's a possession receiver in the mold of Keyshawn
Rison never made a difference on the Raiders. Brown was balling way before Rice for there. They just never made it to a SB. Plus Gruden had a lot to do with those teams
What argument is there to be had?
With the stats he's put up throughout his career you would think his teams were pretty good to elite but they aren't which makes (IMO) those numbers empty. He's a possession receiver in the mold of Keyshawn
why would you think the team is good based on WR stats? no one with knowledge of the game makes that leap. stafford and megatron put up godly #'s while being a decent to trash team depending on the season (stafford being trash himself)
That was basically what Dan was saying too. Dan had no ground to stand on. As if team's go from nothing to contender over night.Dan was a hoe yesterday.
Literally the worst show he's had since i first started listening.
He just wouldn't concede the point to Amin.
Amin was like so you're saying if it aint a championship he's a bum?
Dan le batard is so off base at times. No one views Brandon Marshall as a career loser
Dan was a hoe yesterday.
Literally the worst show he's had since i first started listening.
He just wouldn't concede the point to Amin.
Amin was like so you're saying if it aint a championship he's a bum?
Problem with that line of thinking is that it ignore natural progression of young players. Warriors were still a crazy young team so who is to say they couldn't have just improved with Jackson as well. Not to mention that it's not like Kerr came in wanting to make Draymond an integral part of the team. The owner asked Kerr to give Draymond more minutes and then David Lee went down. The team looked so good with Draymond playing that he couldn't go back. Who's to say Mark Jackson couldn't have stumbled into the same thing. People forget that Warriors were giving the Spurs trouble until Steph hurt himself midway through that series. It's not like the team was having no success under Jackson. So to say he was horrible is just completely off base. To say Kerr is better is one thing but to say Jackson was horrible is senseless.
Listen man, you are talking to a person that thinks professional coaches are interchangeable ( and no I didnt steal that from lebartard I have been getting negged for that opinion since sohh days)
They were afraid he would be in the parking lot flipping over their cars in anger.
