Nonstarter? - perhaps. Non issue ? - definitely is an issueEquating black feminist with wenching is a nonstarter
Non factor? - definitely is one of many factors
Last edited:
Nonstarter? - perhaps. Non issue ? - definitely is an issueEquating black feminist with wenching is a nonstarter
I'll start..
If you generalize a whole group, you're almost always gonna end up wrong.
Measuring the vibe of a philosophy by the natterings of a vocal minority is again, more than likely leave you in the wrong place.
And why would I take the ideas of a forum who barely sniffs punani as gospel?
Y'all bitterness is tangible online so how musty must y'all be in the flesh?
Touch a titty, kiss a neck, get some perspective outside the nattering of y'all female equivalents on Twitter, then come back.
Most of y'all ain't even been shopping so stop waving other nikkas receipts
You got a lot of posters on here that seem to get their rocks off by "checking" people or wagging their finger at nikkas.Its funny watching people get offended by this thread but still logging in to Coli on the regular
No. These so called “black women” that continue to ride the wave of mainstream white political or societal issues, while calling themselves pro-black but ignore or don’t react to the prevalent issues that affect their own race. They speak on equality but their actions mirror that of white supremacy; denying their own identity; treat black men or women that don’t side with them, as less than. In other words, they’ll cape for Sandra Bullock but rarely speak on Sandra Bland. They’ll compliment Timmy and Biff but complain about their own. That’s the shyt that I don’t like. So, no it’s not about hate.The coli really hates women huh.
No. These so called “black women” that continue to ride the wave of mainstream white political or societal issues, while calling themselves pro-black but ignore or don’t react to the prevalent issues that affect their own race. They speak on equality but their actions mirror that of white supremacy; denying their own identity; treat black men or women that don’t side with them, as less than. In other words, they’ll cape for Sandra Bullock but rarely speak on Sandra Bland. They’ll compliment Timmy and Biff but complain about their own. That’s the shyt that I don’t like. So, no it’s not about hate.
It's a mating callA lot of the “activism” these black feminists do on Twitter is for sexual access to cacs. shyt corny as hell.
It’s not even the fact that she’s with a white guy. It’s her appearance, facial expression, and style that speaks “no Black Men”.
He even hit her with the
Dis nikka preachin. The cacs, bedwenches and gay nikkas gon tell u u lyin tho.A lot of the “activism” these black feminists do on Twitter is for sexual access to cacs. shyt corny as hell.
I don’t have issues with black women wanting the betterment of black women, cause black women face specific challenges and hindrances unique to them, but majority of so called black feminists I see on social media seem to conflate white liberal issues with black issues as well as being disingenuous and using talking points that do not apply against black men. Like how often they hit buzzwords like “male privilege” as if men of all races are all in a similar position under white supremacy systems, they also ignore statistical data that shows black women are more likely to get employment than black men because they hit more intersectional boxes.
Also, their agenda often seems to have the purpose of jedi mind tricking nikkas into letting them hoe and wench out then welcoming them with open arms if that doesn’t work out how they planned.