i dont think so tbh.....the small porn companies are still booking actual porn stars who work in the industry. And if they are filming new/unknown chicks they arent lying to them about it going on the net.
Porn website must pay 22 women nearly $13M for forcing them to film videos: judge
- Thread starter Street Knowledge
- Start date
i dont think so tbh.....the small porn companies are still booking actual porn stars who work in the industry. And if they are filming new/unknown chicks they arent lying to them about it going on the net.
okay so these hoes thought it would be recorded on Super 8 film and stored on the bookshelf of a vast library at Bruce Wayne's house and he will come in from the balcony after gazing into the full moon as if it were the Bat Signal and select a tape at random and watch it (alone) using his film projector?
this shyt don't make sense
and fukk these hoes. it's 2020. all bets are off
Last edited:
Born2BKing
Veteran
I think folks were always skeptical about how GDP got some of these 18 year white chicks, who never done porn. A lot of them very attractive. I just chalked it up to them paying a butt load of money but this coming out doesn't surprise me or anyone else.
They were told it would be sold to private collectors in Australia. I already conceded those chicks are probably dumb af. That doesn't justify the behavior of the cacs who ran the website.
It’s like somebody said earlier, either women are our equals, or they’re weak and docile susceptible to scams and foolery that need constant protection...can’t be both.
Yeah I mean that was the whole premise of GDP. Good looking normal Women doing porn for the first time for money. But if we really thought about it, there was something going on and here we are.
This is true, but I'm just looking at this on a case by case basis. They filmed 500 girls or so and how many are in the lawsuit? We can't assume all of them didn't read the paperwork, were tricked or coerced.
Travelnomad
Banned
It was me who said that. I got time today
We don't know how you the other girls felt. A lot of victims don't join lawsuits for various reasons. Look at the initial Cosby case - 17 or so women testified against him under oath for the 1st woman's suit but only one of those actually filed her own suit. It's not an easy experience and the success rate for sex cases in court is actually pretty low.
From the articles I read it sounds like classic trafficker M.O., it's intersecting circles of coercion. You get a girl to agree early or easily, she's not going to feel coerced and is more likely to blame herself. Maybe in some cases she was already thinking of doing something like this. Maybe they even were grabbing young wannabe pros to fill out their numbers.
But other girls, who were more reluctant, they had to be pushed harder. Maybe they were lied to more or threatened more forcefully. They're the ones who are going to feel the most violated. Every girl reacts different, maybe even some of those will blame themselves, but others are willing to come forward.
When they raid a sex trafficking establishment, even the ones that have the girls on full lockdown, they rarely will have a group of girls who all have the same story. They were each brought in their own individual way.
Last edited:
Be careful- sticking up for women will get you branded as a dap fishing simp
Never mind the fact that the brehs who feel these chicks got what they deserve are doing just that
Last edited:
It's already a known fact that they weren't girls from the industry. The organizers put ads for a photo shoot on modeling sites so they could get girls who wouldn't otherwise do porn. They aren't even disputing that aspect of the business.