So according to you, you can put out an album that gets bigger than you, that's also free of filler just as you said, but even if it becomes your most legendary well known work and solidified as an absolute masterpiece, none of this is indicative of it being your best year and even though it remains your most legendary album it's not like snoops doggystyle and it didn't propel Nas into one of the biggest artist in Hip-Hop at the time?
I'm done here.
The keyword is
becomes. It wasn't that in 1994 and that was my point. Nas's 1994 is noteworthy in retrospect. When
Illmatic dropped, he was overlooked as was the album. That album got a coveted 5 mics in The Source, but Biggie took home both album of the year and lyricist of the year for an album that got 4.5 mics.
Illmatic grew as Nas got bigger to become the mythical albun that it is now.
And
Illmatic by no means propelled Nas's career the way
Doggystyle did for Snoop.
Doggystyle was that album out the gate. It was breaking and setting records commercially. It remains Snoop's best selling album, which also happens to be his best effort.
Illmatic did not break and set records. It isn't Nas's best seller. It sold over time. It may be Nas's best album, but that hardly equates to 1994 being his best year.