in Harlem we don't post shyt on the internet to prove something to another manWhy not
in Harlem we don't post shyt on the internet to prove something to another manWhy not
Fixedin Harlem we don't post shyt on the internet
all jokes aside, it's kinda how I feel. I'm not gonna respond to someone else's demandsFixed
So you agree with what he's saying? TLOU gameplay is 'meh' or average?
I like this guy @Killigraphy as he offers a sane approach talking to these nuts. I have played and beaten the game it is one of the best but the shyt overrated I mean it was basic. The story cinematic made the game impressive.
Are you implying that you don't have to play a video game to assess it's gameplay?
That's just your opinion. your "honesty" doesn't make it an absolutely valid critique. People tend to call out some dissenters of the gameplay because often it was by people with no actual hands on or known haters. You wasn't feeling it?Good thing I bought a PC, X1, and a PS4.
Also, nikkas aren't wrong in TLOU gameplay criticism. TLOU is a great experience, but I def found myself feeling like the gameplay was mediocre more than anything. The world crafted around it had me enamored(it's honestly a beautifully crafted game), and the story/presentation pulled me in, but I was NOT staying for the gameplay and that may just be the reason I haven't really gone back and beat the game a 2nd time. Don't feel like TLOU did anything that exceeded expectation in terms of stealth, combat or crafting, but it was good enough to enjoy within the experience. MP was entertaining for a while but I just don't dig MP on TPS shooters.
PSN: TrillZebra.
Now tell me how I'm wrong and a stan now cause you nikkas don't like honest criticism.
That's just your opinion. your "honesty" doesn't make it an absolutely valid critique.
Are you retarded?Better gameplay, yes. Further explained in my previous posts, that the controls in the SoM don't feel clunky, like they do in TLOU.
So with said, why assume anyone with an opposite opinion of yours to b a stan or w/e? Going back though, saying tlou feels clunky sounds like a faulty analysis.You are falling into a fallacy with that statement. By definition a critique, is an analytical theory. Validity is irrelevant because what is deemed "valid" is in and of itself an opinion.
So with said, why assume anyone with an opposite opinion of yours to b a stan or w/e?
Others probed you to go more in depth and to provide receipts but that seemed too hefty of a request hence why the ad hominems started. Also you too, couldn't let some of the opinions of those who disagreed with you go and they too were subject to ad hominems.Broadly; common sense...more specifically; when someone can't just let an opinion go, and has to constantly find ways to either deny it or use ad hominems to try and deflate it, that's usually the mark of a sycophant.