Playstation NOW heading to PC

[Kamikaze Revy]

That's not happening, this isn't the Bodybuilding forums or R/Gaming on Reddit, we're not having a pissing contest via trophies earned in a videogame.

Why not

 

[Killigraphy]

Did you beat TLOU?

Twice, but again that's a red herring, one doesn't have to beat a game to understand a certain aspect of it is subpar. I don't have to beat Contra to know that its one of the hardest games of all time.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

Why is it the loudest critics of the last of us without fail on this forum always refuse to provide any proof they played the game


It's a very distinct pattern.

 

[Kamikaze Revy]

Twice, but again that's a red herring, one doesn't have to beat a game to understand a certain aspect of it is subpar. I don't have to beat Contra to know that its one of the hardest games of all times.

Trophies would indicate how much time you actually spent with the game.
For example, you really wouldn't be qualified to say contra was one of the hardest games ever if you haven't played any other games, or got passed the first level.
It's relevant to the claims you're making.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

Twice, but again that's a red herring, one doesn't have to beat a game to understand a certain aspect of it is subpar. I don't have to beat Contra to know that its one of the hardest games of all time.

Except it isn't subpar. The gameplay is perfect for the type of game it wants to be. Survival horror.

 

[Killigraphy]

Trophies would indicate how much time you actually spent with the game.
For example, you really wouldn't be qualified to say contra was one of the hardest games ever if you haven't played any other games, or got passed the first level.
It's relevant to the claims you're making.

My claim isn't one about difficulty of the game, or having problems beating it, hence the red herring application to your question. Even if I didn't beat it, if I feel the gameplay is clunky within the first 2 hours, then there's really nothing else to it. Posting proof that I beat it is irrelevant, especially since its not the point at hand.

Or I'm assuming you think finishing a game is correlated with critique? I don't have to beat a game to know if its great or subpar, in this case, gameplay is an aspect that one can grasp in a couple of minutes.

 

[TBdaGhost]

I love TLOU gameplay. I beat it twice on the hardest difficulty and played a ton of hours multiplayer, and that's all game play

I could see it being boring on normal difficulty cause it's super easy. Once you up the difficulty it's way better and it doesn't get cheap to make it harder

 

[Killigraphy]

Except it isn't subpar. The gameplay is perfect for the type of game it wants to be. Survival horror.

That's your opinion...mine differs of course, but that doesn't take anything away from how its one of the GOATS...no game is perfect.

 

[TBdaGhost]

My claim isn't one about difficulty of the game, or having problems beating it, hence the red herring application to your question. Even if I didn't beat it, if I feel the gameplay is clunky within the first 2 hours, then there's really nothing else to it. Posting proof that I beat it is irrelevant, especially since its not the point at hand.

Or I'm assuming you think finishing a game is correlated with critique? I don't have to beat a game to know if its great or subpar, in this case, gameplay is an aspect that one can grasp in a couple of minutes.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

I love TLOU gameplay. I beat it twice on the hardest difficulty and played a ton of hours multiplayer, and that's all game play

I could see it being boring on normal difficulty cause it's super easy. Once you up the difficulty it's way better and it doesn't get cheap to make it harder

The hardest difficulty fundamentally changes the way the game is played.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

Sorry but if you can't provide proof you have played and beaten the game then


I'm 100% accurate at calling out tlou critics as having never played it or having only played on easy or normal.

 

[Killigraphy]

Being good at games can't be compartmentalized, some of us are good at games the minute we touch them...others suck completely. Every aspect of TLOU I've grown up playing. From third person shooting mechanics to Stealth, it wasn't a new realm for me.

 

[Killigraphy]

Sorry but if you can't provide proof you have played and beaten the game then


I'm 100% accurate at calling out tlou critics as having never played it or having only played on easy or normal.

Ad hominems don't work, never will...

I don't have to go to Detroit to know that it sucks.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

Ad hominems don't work, never will...

I don't have to go to Detroit to know that it sucks.

Are you implying that you don't have to play a video game to assess it's gameplay?

 

[GoldenGlove]

For one...Gamefaqs.

The Last of Us Reviews for PlayStation 3 - GameFAQs

That was the ongoing meme with TLOU...a crowbar breaks...a crowbar. I get that they wanted to keep the use of weapons sporadic, but some things were just plain silly. Even a guy who gave it a 5 star review, said the controls felts a bit "off". We can't statistically rate either opinion, but we do know and can further research that my "opinion" has been stated plenty of times already, and discussed in further detail on several boards.

Since when did Gamefaqs review games? Did you seriously just post a link to user reviews?