Don’t be so quick to trust those yt doctors.
Always remember, there is no JUSTICE it's Just Us, brotha.
*leaves thread to do more research*
Agree on the general point, but a doctor isn't too likely to fabricate a claim this big while under oath. If he really had repaired a ruptured testicle, there'd be multiple people in the emergency room who could testify against him as well as probably some sort of internal scarring/sutures that would prove he was lying. Not to mention that they have the original medical reports from the examination which I doubt the doctor could edit in retrospect.
Obviously someone is lying so we can't know everything, but this seems to be the sequence we can pin down:
1) Police started mad-dogging a group of teenagers, decent chance it was racial profiling.
2) One of the teenagers mouthed off to an officer, and when that officer approached them, the kids ran.
3) One of the kids got caught and fought back/struggled with officers to some degree.
4) That kid got arrested and patted down by a female officer. The kid claims she grabbed his junk, she claims she never even touched his junk. Video is inconclusive. One of them is lying or at least exaggerating.
5) The kid is charged with assaulting an officer, resisting arrest and reckless endangerment. While in custody he makes no mention of any problem with his testicles.
6) The next day, his mom takes him to the doctor saying that an officer pulled on his junk and he has serious testicular pain. The doctor does an exploratory surgery and finds no rupture of the testicle. However, he does find a small pre-existing blood clot. In testimony before a grand jury, the doctor says there was no sign of trauma.
7) The boy and his mother push a story to the media claiming that his testicle was ruptured by the police and he may be unable to have children.
8) Later after the medical records come out, the boy's lawyer admits there was no rupture and admits the blood clot was preexisting, but says there was trauma.
I'm happy to be corrected but so far that seems to be the sequence of events. Unless there's any missing evidence, it seems pretty predictable that the grand jury isn't going to approve an indictment in this case and I'm someone who feels police need to be indicted about 200x more often than they currently are. There is zero chance that he was gonna win a conviction in court considering the lack of evidence.