Petition to get @thekingsmen banned for COVID conspiracy nonsense

Should @thekingsmen be banned??

  • Yes (Fukk That Nikka)

    Votes: 125 58.7%
  • No

    Votes: 88 41.3%

  • Total voters
    213

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,670
Reputation
5,129
Daps
46,882
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
if the forum had open registration and new people regular joining who aren't familiar with his posting, then maybe.

but everyone here knows the deal. just put his ass on ignore if he bothers you that much, or scroll past his posts. it's not that hard.

at least he said he doesn't believe in viruses. there's posters here who acknowledge the virus is real and still promoting acting recklessly because looking out for others hurts their murican freedom

1. he doesn't argue in good faith - intentionally or not
2. he finds things difficult to understand which leads to too many non-sequiturs and weak arguments.

the following is not discussion, is not amusing and serves only to disrupt.

#coli disruption is entertaining sometimes but this is just "troll" and sub-standard "troll" at that.

-

oaA4l76.png


-

it's not just about him. other infiltrators and trouble-makers seize on the trolling and amplify it. they know he is talking crap but they fan the flames of that nonsense to cause further disruption.

it is what it is :yeshrug:.

they claim that they want to debate BUT they will never actually debate anyone in a controlled setting. we already know that

arguing in bad faith is antithetical to the very purpose of a discussion board and when too many do it, it weakens rather than strengthens the discourse .
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
74,181
Reputation
25,317
Daps
484,019
Reppin
NULL
1. he doesn't argue in good faith - intentionally or not
2. he finds things difficult to understand which leads to too many non-sequiturs and weak arguments.

the following is not discussion, is not amusing and serves only to disrupt.

#coli disruption is entertaining sometimes but this is just "troll" and sub-standard "troll" at that.

oaA4l76.png


it's not just about him. other infiltrators and trouble-makers seize on the trolling and amplify it. they know he is talking crap but they fan the flames of that nonsense to cause further disruption.

it is what it is :yeshrug:.

they claim that they want to debate BUT they will never actually debate anyone in a controlled setting. we already know that

arguing in bad faith is antithetical to the very purpose of a discussion board and when too many do it, it weakens rather than strengthens the discourse .
he banned from the main covid thread right?
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
I won't disagree that I'm being condescending (it's well deserved).

But no, it's not contradictory to formally exchange ideas without insults and logical fallacies. The fact that you call this "contradictory" further cements why you don't know what it means to actually debate.



...Let's roll the tape.
















I'm sorry, what was that you said?








"Debate" was over after that. :unimpressed:

I'm asking for actual facts, and you say you don't have to offer evidence because everything you've said up to that point was you f*cking "opinion"?

F*ck outta here.

You nitpicked again...Good job. I know you won't show all that info.

.
tenor.gif
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
1. he doesn't argue in good faith - intentionally or not
2. he finds things difficult to understand which leads to too many non-sequiturs and weak arguments.

the following is not discussion, is not amusing and serves only to disrupt.

#coli disruption is entertaining sometimes but this is just "troll" and sub-standard "troll" at that.

-

oaA4l76.png


-

it's not just about him. other infiltrators and trouble-makers seize on the trolling and amplify it. they know he is talking crap but they fan the flames of that nonsense to cause further disruption.

it is what it is :yeshrug:.

they claim that they want to debate BUT they will never actually debate anyone in a controlled setting. we already know that

arguing in bad faith is antithetical to the very purpose of a discussion board and when too many do it, it weakens rather than strengthens the discourse .

:mjlol:

Who is controlling the setting ?
 
Top