people never talk about Stockton, Drexler, and Mullin on the Dream Team

[I.AM.PIFF]

LMA ? He's 27 already, he ain't progressing that much and will remain an all star / fringe all star which isn't shaby.

I'm not seeing Griffin being better than Malone / Barkley either.

 

[Jesus Is Lord]

Perfect gif for this occasion.

Dap and +rep

 

[the cool]

I'm not seeing Griffin being better than Malone / Barkley either.

lol you're freaking horrible


griffin won't be better than shawn kemp


griffin won't even be better than chris gatling

 

[I.AM.PIFF]

griffin won't even be better than chris gatling

 

[Street Knowledge]

Chris Mullen is my nikka. Stockton was always overrated to me.

 

[Black Ball]

Stockton may be the most underrated perennial allstar ever. His sheer talent level was just barely above average but dude worked his ass off on the court. very crafty scorer.

Never got to see Mullin play much

Doubt the NBA has ever seen a better PF in his prime than Malone. Yes better than Barkley and Duncan is a Center playing PF. LMA and Griffin have the potential to surpass KM and CB tho.

This whole statement is silly. Barkley was a better basketball player than Malone. He could do everything better than Malone on the court. Score from anywhere on the floor, shooting range, post-game, ball handling, passing, & rebounding. I'll give Malone a tie on running the lane. Only thing Malone has over Barkley was fitness, longevity & a lil defense. In their primes Barkley was clearly over Malone. You bringing up LMA & Griffin is a joke also.

 

[madness]

@lamarcus aldridge and blake griffin being in the same convo as malone and barkley. we can tell who watched 90s basketball and who didn't.

 

[Art Barr]

nikkaz was on some bullshyt!!

trying to talk bad about drexler in my thread, a while back.

more exposals for these huff ignorant nikkaz.


art barr

 

[jadillac]

Those of us who were NBA fans back then dont forget about them on the team....it's only the new era Michael Jordan jockers who act like nobody else matters.

 

[intruder]

This whole statement is silly. Barkley was a better basketball player than Malone. He could do everything better than Malone on the court. Score from anywhere on the floor, shooting range, post-game, ball handling, passing, & rebounding. I'll give Malone a tie on running the lane. Only thing Malone has over Barkley was fitness, longevity & a lil defense. In their primes Barkley was clearly over Malone. You bringing up LMA & Griffin is a joke also.

Barkley was not a better shooter than malone. Him hitting more 3's than malone doesnt make him a better shooter. Malone's top of the key and corner J's were money.

Barkley had better handles and better passer. They are close in the rebounding category but Barkleys numbers look better. Defense was foreign to Barkley whereas Malone was a silent kilelr on defense. he wouldnt block your shot often but he's lock you up for sure.

Now that i think about it barkley was the better player overall but Malone was close

best PF's I've seen play not in order

• Malone
• Barkley
• Webber
• Garnett
• Dirk
• Kemp (pre cocaine and beer gut)

Honorable mentions: One cant help but wonder what McDyess could have been if it wasnt for that bad knee or Sheed Wallace and the weed and carelessness problem

 

[Black Ball]

Barkley was not a better shooter than malone. Him hitting more 3's than malone doesnt make him a better shooter. Malone's top of the key and corner J's were money.

Barkley had better handles and better passer. They are close in the rebounding category but Barkleys numbers look better. Defense was foreign to Barkley whereas Malone was a silent kilelr on defense. he wouldnt block your shot often but he's lock you up for sure.

Now that i think about it barkley was the better player overall but Malone was close

Barkley had great overall shooting touch from anywhere on the court, thing is he just didn't shoot a whole lot from the perimeter, while Malone's go to shot was a 15-18 footer middle to late in his career. Barkley was so dominant in the post, he didn't play around on the perimeter too much.

 

[Street Knowledge]

At their ABSOLUTE best I'd take Barkley over Malone. And I like him more In the playoffs

 

[STEVE]

larry bird should have been doing some goddamn yoga for his back before he got

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

It's because they didn't win rings, you know how it is with great players who don't win rings, they don't count.


Really, it's a personality/media recognition thing.

so drexler on the rockets doesnt count

 

[mbewane]

Barkley was not a better shooter than malone. Him hitting more 3's than malone doesnt make him a better shooter. Malone's top of the key and corner J's were money.

Barkley had better handles and better passer. They are close in the rebounding category but Barkleys numbers look better. Defense was foreign to Barkley whereas Malone was a silent kilelr on defense. he wouldnt block your shot often but he's lock you up for sure.

Now that i think about it barkley was the better player overall but Malone was close

best PF's I've seen play not in order

• Malone
• Barkley
• Webber
• Garnett
• Dirk
• Kemp (pre cocaine and beer gut)

Honorable mentions: One cant help but wonder what McDyess could have been if it wasnt for that bad knee or Sheed Wallace and the weed and carelessness problem

Word, especially Sheed shyt even Webber without the injuries and more D could've made a run at best PF IMO. Too bad