Honestly from what I watch with my strongest convictions, Broner and Malinaggi both beats the shyt out of Thurman, now Porter would bring a whole different dimension of problems on top of him having a pretty solid beard...............
Thurman simply needs a name for me to gauge him correctly, and even gauging him on his level and on his scale he's a c class fighter, he showed nothing but tumbleweeds vs Zavek, was getting the shyt boxed out of by Chaves before he landed a fluke body ko, was getting worked by Karrass bum ass, he failed to showcase in showcase matches vs handpicked guys..........he failed to showcase anything after his mouth got him that hype and buzz. Say what you want about a Broner for getting his ass whooped by he talked the talked and stood tall and ran from no higher level fighters even post Malinaggi when it was clear he wasn't quite ready for that level..........
Bottom line I'm tired of hearing of Thurman in theoretical matches, for all the talk of fighters ducking, how is looking for a bigger payday, vs more proven fighters ducking, what does a Thurman win does to anyone not named Khan or Broner(haymon hype train), absolutely nothing......Not to mention there were a myriad of other fights he could have took, why not a Josestio Lopez, he's a bum nikka too, do they not trust a Thurman vs him, I mean any live body........
But I digress