There has to be some type of corroboration
They're not going to raid a someone like Diddy just off word of mouth. If they did, they'd always be there
P Diddy’s Los Angeles home raided by DHS
- Thread starter dezert_storm
- Start date
They're not going to raid a someone like Diddy just off word of mouth. If they did, they'd always be there
Feds don’t act unless something is iron tight
Vic Damone. Jr
Don't support the phonies, support the real
Marlow Stanfield
Superstar
Day_Walker
All Star
As you can see, he moved out of Harlem.considering what we now know about Puff, theres a good chance that after he smashed that bottle of champagne over Stoute's head, he pulled out another one and stuck it somewhere else.
lol
neos coli posts are pretty much just him drilling glory holes in the bathroom stalls at mar-a-lago and tapping his toes but lets be mad at boogers aight
fifty-eleven pages of arguing the meaning of rape in cosbys case (and completely derailing the thread) for no other reason than being a contrarian. theres no real reason for him to defend the man day-in and day-out on here other than to rouse anger and get attention... and it works. his glee is palpable.
if hes playing a character he is at best corny. if he isnt, well... ill hold my tongue. im still pickin out stickers from the bushes
apologies for my own derailing here
The process for getting a search warrant like that is pretty intensive
First, investigators interview witnesses, collect evidence, analyze phone data, or financial documents they have access to through subponeas/
then the lead agent, writes, what is called a search warrant affidavit. That is usually like 30 pages long, maybe 60. Maybe 100. I read a 300 page one before. It will detail reasons why they believe they need to enter the homes, and what they want to seize, and why they want to seize it. The one for the warrant served at MAR A LAGO is like 60 pages I think. I read it whenever it was unsealed.
That goes to the Assistant US Attorney on the case, he clears it with his section chief, and in a high profile case like that, they clear it with the US Attorney of the district, who is appointed by the President.
Then they take it to a judge, and he has to sign off on it.
Then they organize the actual raids, coordinate with local police. They even sometimes reach out to the defendants attorneys, and let them know in advance. So, at this point the search warrant affidavit is SEALED, and only the judge has seen it, what will probably happen is it will be UNSEALED when or if the criminal charges are filed. They don't have to show everything in the search warrant, but enough to convince a federal judge that they have cause.
it's not like someone just says SEARCH PUFF"S HOUSES - there is a whole process, and if there are mistakes, then that could mean anything found in the house would be inadmissible as evidence.
First, investigators interview witnesses, collect evidence, analyze phone data, or financial documents they have access to through subponeas/
then the lead agent, writes, what is called a search warrant affidavit. That is usually like 30 pages long, maybe 60. Maybe 100. I read a 300 page one before. It will detail reasons why they believe they need to enter the homes, and what they want to seize, and why they want to seize it. The one for the warrant served at MAR A LAGO is like 60 pages I think. I read it whenever it was unsealed.
That goes to the Assistant US Attorney on the case, he clears it with his section chief, and in a high profile case like that, they clear it with the US Attorney of the district, who is appointed by the President.
Then they take it to a judge, and he has to sign off on it.
Then they organize the actual raids, coordinate with local police. They even sometimes reach out to the defendants attorneys, and let them know in advance. So, at this point the search warrant affidavit is SEALED, and only the judge has seen it, what will probably happen is it will be UNSEALED when or if the criminal charges are filed. They don't have to show everything in the search warrant, but enough to convince a federal judge that they have cause.
it's not like someone just says SEARCH PUFF"S HOUSES - there is a whole process, and if there are mistakes, then that could mean anything found in the house would be inadmissible as evidence.
BandOfGypsys
All Star
So Gene was probably telling the truth
