Over a third of Trump supporters follow white nationalists on Twitter

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Would a large number of non-white nationalists follow white nationalists on twitter?

​

 

[BushidoBrown]

For starters, vote to ensure the candidate that's stoking white nationalism doesn't get into the white house.

I know, I know.



Actually, this election, it crushes the dreams of Neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and other white supremacists all over the country.

If you think that's "nothing," eat ass.

i could agree with the fact that voting is prob the first line of defense against allowing such a catalyst for those nationalists to further their agenda.

but lets not act like many of them didnt make threats to start a race war if their candidate doesnt get in.
they buy guns like that shyt is ketchup. everybody on their side got one..do you?


Im not saying this will actually happen Im just posing the questions.

people talk real slick but when it comes to having a plan b, everybody start stuttering

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

"Buh buh but Trump supporters are just well-intentioned working class people who got laid off from factories that moved to China!"

Basket of deplorables indeed. Saying that was the only good thing Hillary did this whole election cycle.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

"Buh buh but Trump supporters are just well-intentioned working class people who got laid off from factories that moved to China!"

Basket of deplorables indeed.

Did you at least read the OP...and it actually seemed legitimate to you??

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Did you at least read the OP...and it actually seemed legitimate to you??

I see nothing wrong with the methodology nor did I see you make a valid case that there was.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Lets do some math here...Trump has 12 million individual twitter followers...

if this bullshyt was true there should be 12,000,000/3= 4,000,000 racists signed up between all the listed white nationalists

but there arent..david duke has 20,000 and hes one of the the most famous ones on that list

in fact if you add them all up i doubt you would barely break 75,000 unique subscribers


But hey dont let those annoying facts intrude in your fantasy

Imma just leave this here....the wrath of the math

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Nate Silver:

It’s time to stop worrying about outliers and start worrying about inliers. Earlier this year, my colleague Harry Enten documented evidence of pollster “herding” — the tendency of polling firms to produce results that closely match one another, especially toward the end of a campaign.1 What’s wrong with the polls agreeing with one another? The problem is that it’s sometimes a case of the blind leading the blind...
A few pollsters are shameless about their herding. One of them is Public Policy Polling (PPP), an polling firm that conducts automated polls for both public consumption and for liberal and Democratic clients.

Take a look at this exchange, for example, between The New York Times’ Nate Cohn13 and PPP’s Tom Jensen. Cohn discovered that in 2012, the racial composition of PPP’s polls was correlated in an unusual way with President Obama’s performance among white voters in their surveys. If Obama was performing especially poorly among whites in one PPP poll, it tended to have a higher share of nonwhite voters, which boosted Obama’s result. And if Obama was doing relatively well among whites, PPP projected less nonwhite turnout, keeping his lead in check. As a result, PPP’s polls tended to show an unusually steady race between Obama and Mitt Romney.

I’m picking on PPP for a reason: They’re the biggest herders in the business

...

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

...

"Nate Silver didn't say that."

 

[bnew]

likely much higher now.