No, the targeting of biographies itself is just scust... not sure how they can argue against those life stories with a straight facecensoring is more alarming than banning?
No, the targeting of biographies itself is just scust... not sure how they can argue against those life stories with a straight facecensoring is more alarming than banning?
oh so you're one of those people: conservatives living in safe blue spaces and voicing displeasure with that state while viewing these deep red areas as "backwoods" when you're actually suppose to want to live there since they align with your views.Looking at the states involved
Giving this attention helps them more than it hurts.
No.oh so you're one of those people: conservatives living in safe blue spaces and voicing displeasure with that state while viewing these deep red areas as "backwoods" when you're actually suppose to want to live there since they align with your views.
or do i have it wrong and you're living in one of those "backwoods" states now?
My point is CRT, for whatever reason(s) is a winning issue for the GoP loons and IMO shouldnt be pushed to the forefront.
Ignore it and let it go away or linger until they shoot themselves in the foot.
History books were also banned. It'd be weird not censoring/banning those books too.No, the targeting of biographies itself is just scust... not sure how they can argue against those life stories with a straight face
I know how they argue thoseHistory books were also banned. It'd be weird not censoring/banning those books too.
now I'm even more confused.