I don't see how mentioning Lebron as a great scorer is propaganda.
Other than MJ, who is the best scorer of all time?
While I'm surprised he wasn't named, he wasn't durable enough and isn't definitively a better shooter than Kobe.how did this thread get so far without mentioning a 6'9, more athletic, better shooting kobe that is :
Its only a strawman if you can answer and say it's agenda regardless of what his opinion wasComplain about another fan base in a LeBron stan propoganda thread brehs.
So you didn't come into this thread and reply to someone's post with a straw man, and then you had the nerve to say nobody will answer your question?
Until then, no I did not.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 31,609
- Reputation
- -10,523
- Daps
- 21,832
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
Look, the best scorer is Ovie now and forever 
DC looking like a 1/2 seed overcheeaaaaaaa 
He posted a chart showing the scoring average and TS% of various all-time scorers in NBA history. He obviously doesn't place Kobe that high, but may entertain other names. The same way other posters in here may entertain AI or KD but not Bron. Or how yet another breh thinks T-Mac belongs even though no one brought him up for 4 pages so he's clearly in the minority.Pause at the bold. Who said he couldn't?
And please find the post where I said Lebron wasn't in the discussion. Play dumb just to create arguments brehs.
The nikka says Bron, makes no argument for him, yet wants arguments when another name is bought up
Then his response justified my beliefs. He was better off saying Bron is the best, instead of p*ssyfooting around it.
Just admit you got in your feelings and you misread what I said.
So because he didn't write a dissertation on LeBron's body of work or a wall of highlights it's not enough?
Why is it obvious to everyone else except y'all LeBron stans?
Its only a strawman if you can answer and say it's agenda regardless of what his opinion was
You ran in this thread with your pom-poms on, causing you to misread what he posted, then using a straw man (the poster even called you out on it), and then you deflect by shifting the argument about the OP's intentions, when his intentions were clear to anyone who's been paying attention - if not, then it was mighty obvious after his reply, when he admitted so.
The fact of the matter is, he wasn't trying to have a "legitimate discussion" - it was just another thread where he could stan LeBron and shyt on other players (namely Kobe).
Why is it obvious to everyone else except y'all LeBron stans?
QUOTE="Shadow King, post: 29806520, member: 7068"]
Its only a strawman if you can answer and say it's agenda regardless of what his opinion was[/quote]
You ran in this thread with your pom-poms on, causing you to misread what he posted, then using a straw man (the poster even called you out on it), and then you deflect by shifting the argument about the OP's intentions, when his intentions were clear to anyone who's been paying attention - if not, then it was mighty obvious after his reply, when he admitted so.
The fact of the matter is, he wasn't trying to have a "legitimate discussion" - it was just another thread where he could stan LeBron and shyt on other players (namely Kobe).[/QUOTE]
I don't care what he "called" me out on.
So I'ma have to assume the answer to my question is no, if another player was named, it wouldn't be an agenda
QUOTE="Shadow King, post: 29806520, member: 7068"]
Its only a strawman if you can answer and say it's agenda regardless of what his opinion was
[/quote]
You ran in this thread with your pom-poms on, causing you to misread what he posted, then using a straw man (the poster even called you out on it), and then you deflect by shifting the argument about the OP's intentions, when his intentions were clear to anyone who's been paying attention - if not, then it was mighty obvious after his reply, when he admitted so.
The fact of the matter is, he wasn't trying to have a "legitimate discussion" - it was just another thread where he could stan LeBron and shyt on other players (namely Kobe).[/QUOTE]
I don't care what he "called" me out on.
So I'ma have to assume the answer to my question is no, if another player was named, it wouldn't be an agenda
Of course, you don't, because you made your intentions clear a long, long, long time ago.
As have you...
Jordan>>LeFrozen
It was written in the Bible
Well to be fair. Kobe did average 35There are some who are just fans of Kobe and I think that's fine.
But the vocal, spamming clowns like Sccit and the departed Swagnificent who insist Kobe would average like 40 points a game in this era, and a whole bunch of other stupid hyperbolic shyt ruin it for the rest of you.
hell he averaged 27 on his last knees in 2012-2013. Before you say it, westbrook averaged 30 & 31 with the same ill advised shoot selection as kobe, and if he took more shots and instead of insisting on getting 10 or more assist, he could of possibly averaged 34-35. Idk about 40 but 06-07 kobe could easily get 36-37.....would his team get far? Maybe notthen again, that roster didn’t really go far in 06-07 eitherThis is page 5 of the thread man.Why is it obvious to everyone else except y'all LeBron stans?
If you don't think Lebron is a great scorer just say so.
Otherwise, just reply with "why do you care what I think" like you did to me a few days ago, because I really don't need these quote notifications from you.
1970s NBA has to be covered more
Kareem is the best scorer as he has the unstoppable skyhook
He played with Oscar, another great one
Kareem is the best scorer as he has the unstoppable skyhook
He played with Oscar, another great one
@Gil Scott-Heroin
again, its not my fault bron scores 27 at above average efficiency
I am willing to concede that there is a serious argument for players like KD, George Gervin and Kareem Abdul Jabbar
of course you are not going to like this thread because it exposes serious flaws in your support for Kobe, Curry and Irving (players whose legacies, unlike Bron, are built on the fact that they are good scorers)
kobe-> too much volume shooting
curry->not enough minutes
Irving->does not score as much as the aforementioned scorers
again, its not my fault bron scores 27 at above average efficiency
I am willing to concede that there is a serious argument for players like KD, George Gervin and Kareem Abdul Jabbar
of course you are not going to like this thread because it exposes serious flaws in your support for Kobe, Curry and Irving (players whose legacies, unlike Bron, are built on the fact that they are good scorers)
kobe-> too much volume shooting
curry->not enough minutes
Irving->does not score as much as the aforementioned scorers
