Oshay Duke Jackson ethers the White Queen of the Manosphere for anti-Black racism!

[Ish Gibor]

This is WHY JustPearlyThings needs to be cancelled.

Look at how she's playing dumb to the virulent white supremacist rhetoric of Nick Fuentes. Like that man ain't recorded talking positively about Hitler and calling Black people n***ers.

And she's 26...so it's not like she's ignorant. Oh she knows...and in typical white supremacist fashion playong dumb to racism to save her own ass publically. As if having a Nazi on her show was an honest mistake she had nothing to do with.

She's a fukking racist republican white supremacist piece of shyt just like him.

JustPearlyThings gets DESTROYED on Triggernometry Podcast!!!!



JustPearlyThings CAUGHT LYING on Triggernometry Podcast!



ValuetainmentMoney does DAMAGE CONTROL for JustPearlyThings and FAILS MISERABLY!

If she even pretended to give a fukk about Black People she wouldn't of even had him on her platform to begin with!!!!!

She cares so much, she’s against the Justice Claim Reparations for Black Americans.

She's racist scum and needs to go.

Here is the whole interview at the Triggernometry Podcast!

 

[Sonny Bonds]

Nevermind, it’s the same video as above.

 

[HarlemHottie]

MikeTV got Sa Ra Garvey looking crazy.

 

[NatiboyB]

Pearl Exposed HERSELF As A Racist! (this video proves it)

Racist @JustPearlyThings Keeps Getting Exposed! #miketv #justpearlythings

www.youtube.com

JPT admitted in a interview with Hotep Jesus that she didn't even INTERACT (let alone talk to or befriend) with Black People until she was in college and that she shamelessly grifts off Black people/Black culture while saying "hell no" to reparations.


She just another racist white woman and I'm glad she getting packed up!

No one has packed her up far as I can tell she’s still going and her show was never about black people. Y’all just want to complain about any damn thing.

 

[Bumblebreh]

Here is the whole interview at the Triggernometry Podcast!

The comments on the original video are on the spectrum. The video has showed that she is clearly not the brains behind the operation, but she has already cemented her brand as being another soul less agent.

 

[Ish Gibor]

No one has packed her up far as I can tell she’s still going and her show was never about black people. Y’all just want to complain about any damn thing.

You seem to know more about that channel. In Percentages. How much do you estimate BP participated on the JPT channel? Was it more or less than 50%?

 

[NatiboyB]

You seem to know more about that channel. In Percentages. How much do you estimate BP participated on the JPT channel? Was it more or less than 50%?

It’s probably around 50% I can’t sit here and act like she didn’t have a diverse panels (I thought that’s what people wanted). It’s not a black show or a white show it’s just what it is.

It’s ironic because if she never had black folks on she would be racist. If she has black folks on she’s racist. I think a lot of folks have lost site of what racism is.

 

[Ish Gibor]

It’s probably around 50% I can’t sit here and act like she didn’t have a diverse panels (I thought that’s what people wanted). It’s not a black show or a white show it’s just what it is.

Ok, thanks. I only watched a few videos from other content creators who talked about her.

It’s ironic because if she never had black folks on she would be racist. If she has black folks on she’s racist. I think a lot of folks have lost site of what racism is.

It’s not that she shouldn’t have black folk on her show.

It’s about the things she has said about Black Americans and the history of slavery, plus her being against reparations for Black Americans.

Furthermore, her having non-Black American Blacks talking about Black American issues. And this was done without any historical context, which made it even worse. Then again we now know how she views Black Americans.

She said it herself, she sees Black dysfunctional behavior as entertaining. I think this was on the Lapeef.

We as Black people (in general) see it as a historical socioeconomic condition that needs to be solved. It’s not a dollar bill thing to us that should be capitalized off, it’s a moral thing to us.

This is where many Manosphere content creators don’t understand what this is about.

Then again, most are just “regular dudes”, not academically schooled, not educated in sociology, cultural anthropology, economics etc.

 

[NatiboyB]

Ok, thanks. I only watched a few videos from other content creators who talked about her.


It’s not that she shouldn’t have black folk on her show.

It’s about the things she has said about Black Americans and the history of slavery, plus her being against reparations for Black Americans. (It’s a lot of folks who disagree with reparations for various reasons. Why is a person racist for that opinion)

Furthermore, her having non-Black American Blacks talking about Black American issues. And this was done without any historical context, which made it even worse. Then again we now know how she views Black Americans. (Why can’t and why shouldn’t in general talk about problems impacting people even if they are black Asian Arab or whatever?)

She said it herself, she sees Black dysfunctional behavior as entertaining. I think this was on the Lapeef. (So due to her being honest that’s a problem? People of all types are entertained by dysfunctional behavior. Yes including us.)

We as Black people (in general) see it as a historical socioeconomic condition that needs to be solved. It’s not a dollar bill thing to us that should be capitalized off, it’s a moral thing to us. (I understand that as well because that’s how I see it. But iI can’t be upset if others don’t share the same view)

This is where many Manosphere content creators don’t understand what this is about.

Then again, most are just “regular dudes”, not academically schooled, not educated in sociology, cultural anthropology, economics etc.

I honestly thing the only issue at hand here is the fact that she’s white. But it’s not her that has the issue. It’s the people who are offended. I can’t be upset someone who interviews controversial figures interviews a controversial figure all because I don’t like them. They can still be interviewed and I can chose rather to view or not. I’ve looked at a lot of interviews with racist and a bunch of other things. Mafia bosses drug dealers pimps bank robbers etc.

 

[Ish Gibor]

I honestly thing the only issue at hand here is the fact that she’s white.

So it’s because she’s white and not because she has said the things she has said about Black Americans and Black people in general (but specifically about Black Americans)? Interesting point of view.

What is she solving for BM and BW? And why has she Black British people talking about Black Americans issues (without context). You have yet to answer many of my questions…

But it’s not her that has the issue.

Indeed it’s not her who has the issue, I mean she’s a 26 year old white woman from the Midwest who grew up in the upperclass. What inconvenient issues would she have that is within the Black community between BM and BW, right?

It’s the people who are offended.

And who are offended by what exactly?

I can’t be upset someone who interviews controversial figures interviews a controversial figure all because I don’t like them.

It’s not about her interviewing a controversial person. Although it was to be expected that he would say controversial things, since he is known for that. This is why he has been kicking off many platforms before.

The irony is that it was her who made these controversial statements and her being in agreement with the controversial things he said. She started with the insults about Black Americans.

More people have controversial individuals on their shows that is true, but it’s to give them pushback or let them talk so the can get exposed.

She as the host didn’t do that. In fact she was in agreement on most of the controversial stands and even enforced them. That is where it all changed!

And digging in her history gave us an even more and clearer picture of her sociopolitical views.

They can still be interviewed and I can chose rather to view or not.

It’s not about viewing or not viewing it. It’s about her creating a sentiment in society and is dangerous! I guess you go and read history and how fascism arises.

See the history of America had this before. First as indentured servants taken into slavery and after the reconstruction era, the rise of the KKK and Jim Crow laws (both started out as a joke).

I’ve looked at a lot of interviews with racist and a bunch of other things. Mafia bosses drug dealers pimps bank robbers etc.

Yes, and did they advocate for entire groups of people to be harmed, did they spew certain rhetoric for entire groups to be harmed?

Please elaborate…

What is left out in the poem above is the Jim Crow laws. As we speak the far right is ademend to bring back the Jim Crow laws and after that slavery in America. This is why they argue so much over the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment to be removed.

 

[Dog Based Gremlin]

Yo OShay made like 20 videos on Pearly in like 2 weeks

 

[Ish Gibor]

Yo OShay made like 20 videos on Pearly in like 2 weeks

Good, let him capitalize off of it.

 

[NatiboyB]

So it’s because she’s white and not because she has said the things she has said about Black Americans and Black people in general (but specifically about Black Americans)? Interesting point of view.

What is she solving for BM and BW? And why has she Black British people talking about Black Americans issues (without context). You have yet to answer many of my questions…


Indeed it’s not her who has the issue, I mean she’s a 26 year old white woman from the Midwest who grew up in the upperclass. What inconvenient issues would she have that is within the Black community between BM and BW, right?


And who are offended by what exactly?


It’s not about her interviewing a controversial person. Although it was to be expected that he would say controversial things.

The irony is that it was her who made these controversial statements and her being in agreement with the controversial things he said.

More people have controversial individuals on their shows, but it’s to give them pushback or let them talk so the can get exposed. She as the host didn’t do that. In fact she was in agreement on most of the controversial stands and even enforced them.


It’s not about viewing or not viewing it. It’s about her creating a sentiment in society and is dangerous! I guess you go and read history and how fascism arises.

See the history of America had this before. First as indentured servants taken into slavery and after the reconstruction era, the rise of the KKK and Jim Crow laws (both started out as a joke).





Yes, and did they advocate for entire groups of people to be harmed?

What is left out in the poem above is the Jim Crow laws. As we speak the far right is ademend to bring back the Jim Crow laws and after that slavery in America. This is why they argue so much over the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment to be removed.

Yes it’s because she’s white its people of all races who feel the same to include black people and they aren’t racist. It’s a difference in opinion. Dangerous sentient is thinking you can talk about people but people can’t talk about you.

 

[Unknown Poster]

No one has packed her up far as I can tell she’s still going and her show was never about black people. Y’all just want to complain about any damn thing.

Pearl built her platform off of black people though that's the thing. If you go to her YouTube channel yeah you might see all white women in the screenshots, but when you click on the videos, it's pearl usually talking to a group of black women about relationships and dating.

She even suggested that she went to the UK because black people there would be more receptive to her than black people in America.

And pearl is not still going, she hasn't even put a video up on her channel since March 20th.

 

[Ish Gibor]

Yes it’s because she’s white its people of all races who feel the same to include black people and they aren’t racist.

So a white person should be able to spew racist propaganda and rhetoric without any kickback and to be hold accountable?

Is that what you are saying?

It’s a difference in opinion.

What do you mean by it’s a different “opinion”.

What is different about her “opinion” that should be accepted as a regular point of contention?

Dangerous sentient is thinking you can talk about people but people can’t talk about you.

So what did people say about a 26 year old white woman like her, who grew up in the upperclass in the Midwest that was evidently hurtful and dangerous? Not just to her but all white Americans!

Can you be specific, very specific!!!

Do you know the history of the Black Codes? Was it horrible or not?

Do you understand the difference between having a conversation about a controversial topic and propagating dangerous rhetoric that clearly can be harmful?

I am from the city that was first bomb by the Nazi regime. I have spoke to elderly people who went through WII. As a child we often played in the woods and found remains of German weapons, helmets, bullets and bunkers.