Type Username Here
Not a new member
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PezlFNTGWv4[/ame]
Journalists are soulless and motherless, so they are not gonna take Dr. Park Dietz advice.
Ratings.
People love hearing about tragedies, shouts to Shakespear.
True, Journalists want sh!t like that so they can
But how do they eat or get ratings if people aren't watching it or drawn to it?
People will watch regardless breh, sh!t like that is interesting, if you said otherwise it wouldnt be true.
Is it the journalists or is it the demand of the populace?
Chicken and the egg?
So, if it's interesting, are the News and Journalists only giving us what we want?
that seems to be the distinction of giving people what they need as opposed to what they want. I think the majority of the responsibility lies with journalism. they are the ones that ultimately decide what to publish. IMO they have a civic responsibility in a democracy, but recently they just focus on making money and telling people what they think they want to hear
If we weren't sold it we wouldn't buy it, right breh?
But would you still think it was interesting?
If there was no News to cover it, but down you street someone got murdered, or there was a bad accident, would you still be drawn to it?