Oman’s Sultan Qaboos, in power since 1970, dies at 79; Haitham bin Tariq becomes Sultan of Oman

[88m3]

only reason monarchies aren't bloody is because the US basically destroyed them all after WWI

can't believe this is even a conversation

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

So we conveniently forget tyrannical and oppressive monarchies, as many of them go, centuries of the same power structure...

Straw man. Nobody conviently forgot about them.

I’m actually fine with power changing hands and all that comes with it, it’s part of democracy. Especially if you’re black in non black nations, there’s enough stacked against you in being able to gain some political capital, last thing I’m looking for is a power structure that firmly locks me on the outside and is “justified” in doing so because it’s a family affair.

WTF!?

Won’t even get into the ridiculous wealth that get accumulated in monarchies.

Don't bother. You'll only make yourself look even more foolish.

fukk no, leave that shyt in the 18th/19th centuries

We did and it ended up with the 20th century the most bloody and oppressive century in human history. The 20th century had loads of oppressive bloody republics and republican leaders
Like:
Adolf Hitler
Chairman Mao
Lenin
Trotsky
Stalin
Kruschev
Brezhnev
Andropov
Gorbachev
Pol Pot
Suharto
Ho Chih Min
The multiple Latin American dictators like Pinochet
The Taliban
Assad
Mohammed Said Barre
The apartheid regime
Mugabe
Idi Amin
Mengistu Haile Mariam
Gaddafi
Hosni Mubarak
Nicolae Ceausescu
Franco
Salazar of Portugal
Alexander Lukashenko
Josip Broz aka Tito
The Kims of North Korea
Erich Honecker
Mobutu
Fulgencio Batista
Fidel Castro
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow
Omar Al-Bashir
Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo
Ayatollahs of Iran

All of the above names were or are el presidentes of republics in the 20th century. Sorry. republics in the 20th century fail.

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

only reason monarchies aren't bloody is because the US basically destroyed them all after WWI

can't believe this is even a conversation

Bwahahahahahahahahaha. Do you really believe that crap you just wrote.
The American education system is an absolute joke.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

only reason monarchies aren't bloody is because the US basically destroyed them all after WWI

can't believe this is even a conversation

right.

or they won the wars... like Britain...

All the losers got rid of theirs

or they pulled out the Guillotines in the 19th century... France

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Straw man. Nobody conviently forgot about them.


WTF!?


Don't bother. You'll only make yourself look even more foolish.


We did and it ended up with the 20th century the most bloody and oppressive century in human history. The 20th century had loads of oppressive bloody republics and republican leaders
Like:
Adolf Hitler
Chairman Mao
Lenin
Trotsky
Stalin
Kruschev
Brezhnev
Andropov
Gorbachev
Pol Pot
Suharto
Ho Chih Min
The multiple Latin American dictators like Pinochet
The Taliban
Assad
Mohammed Said Barre
The apartheid regime
Mugabe
Idi Amin
Mengistu Haile Mariam
Gaddafi
Hosni Mubarak
Nicolae Ceausescu
Franco
Salazar of Portugal
Alexander Lukashenko
Josip Broz aka Tito
The Kims of North Korea
Erich Honecker
Mobutu
Fulgencio Batista
Fidel Castro
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow
Omar Al-Bashir
Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo
Ayatollahs of Iran

All of the above names were or are el presidentes of republics in the 20th century. Sorry. republics in the 20th century fail.

You realize modern map boundaries are amalgams of former kingdoms, right?

Go back even prior to WW1 and the map looked insane.

 

[88m3]

Bwahahahahahahahahaha. Do you really believe that crap you just wrote.
The American education system is an absolute joke.

the middle ages were charming

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

right.

or they won the wars... like Britain...

All the losers got rid of theirs

or they pulled out the Guillotines in the 19th century... France

The American education system in action.
Justify the sheer corruption and bloodiness of republics by saying monarchies were bloody during previous centuries. That's like saying a woman leaves an abusive man then finds another abusive man and that abusive man saying to her, "At least I wasn't abusing you like your previous partner."

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

You realize modern map boundaries are amalgams of former kingdoms, right?

Go back even prior to WW1 and the map looked insane.

Irreleveant.
What the political map was back then doesn't matter. Republics in the 20th century were bloody and violent. No amount of deflection is going to change that.

 

[88m3]

right.

or they won the wars... like Britain...

All the losers got rid of theirs

or they pulled out the Guillotines in the 19th century... France

Yup.

Losers lost their shirts or heads.

Bolsheviks/Communism/French Revolution

Sectarian differences in central/eastern Europe

WWI was the end of European monarchies for the most part

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

the middle ages were charming

I can tell that you rode the short bus when you went to school.
Do you have a point!?

 

[88m3]

I can tell that you rode the short bus when you went to school.
Do you have a point!?

you're acting like monarchies weren't tyrannical and bloody and I rode the short bus?

good luck with your trolling

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

you're acting like monarchies weren't tyrannical and bloody and I rode the short bus?

good luck with your trolling

Again with the straw man. I never said that monarchies weren't or couldn't be tyrannical or bloody. I said republics on average are more tyrannical and bloody. The 20th century has shown this to be the case.

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

Straw man. Nobody conviently forgot about them.


WTF!?


Don't bother. You'll only make yourself look even more foolish.


We did and it ended up with the 20th century the most bloody and oppressive century in human history. The 20th century had loads of oppressive bloody republics and republican leaders
Like:
Adolf Hitler
Chairman Mao
Lenin
Trotsky
Stalin
Kruschev
Brezhnev
Andropov
Gorbachev
Pol Pot
Suharto
Ho Chih Min
The multiple Latin American dictators like Pinochet
The Taliban
Assad
Mohammed Said Barre
The apartheid regime
Mugabe
Idi Amin
Mengistu Haile Mariam
Gaddafi
Hosni Mubarak
Nicolae Ceausescu
Franco
Salazar of Portugal
Alexander Lukashenko
Josip Broz aka Tito
The Kims of North Korea
Erich Honecker
Mobutu
Fulgencio Batista
Fidel Castro
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow
Omar Al-Bashir
Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo
Ayatollahs of Iran

All of the above names were or are el presidentes of republics in the 20th century. Sorry. republics in the 20th century fail.

Wars were happening religiously before the 20th century, technology enabled larger scale war but we also don’t see large wars between world powers the way it happened frequently in the 17th-early 20th centuries.

No one needs monarchies, thanks. But please feel free to go move to a,country that has one

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

That man’s beard is immaculate

reminds me of Baba El Malachi Z York's beard..

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

Wars were happening religiously before the 20th century,

You don't say. Also most war throughout human history weren't religious.

technology enabled larger scale war but we also don’t see large wars between world powers the way it happened frequently in the 17th-early 20th centuries.

Not yet. However what has this gotta do with republics bloodiness and tyranny?

No one needs monarchies, thanks. But please feel free to go move to a,country that has one

I live in one. The UK. Keep thinking republics rule better than monarchies. China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Libya certainly don't have any problems.