wait, im bugging it wasnt rape?
so they convicted dude based on nothing but hearsay. No actual evidence of misconduct. No witnesses. Nothing.
The person allegedly took the girl outside to reach in her underpants? That dont make no sense.
Im convinced they were gropedi'm pretty sure they were groped but they were probably drunk and it was probably someone else.
The system is corrupt as hell and this is bullshyt... his lawyer musta been extra garbage though