Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
The first avenger > wonder woman...
The First Avenger was set in World War II got damn some of you don't know shyt about shyt lol
The first avenger > wonder woman...
I'm thinking they want to save the look of the Cheetah character until closer to the film's release and that is the only reason we didn't get any shots of her.Trailer looks great but we see nothing of the villain and we all know how badly they fukked up that shyt in the first one's third act.
First Avenger wasn't set during WW1 and Ragnarok wasn't set in the 1980s. I'm confused.Breh, im trying not to hate but this the second time wonder woman is late to the party. The first avenger > wonder woman...now ragnarok > 84 I gotta see more.
Loving her skinny ass in that gold costume tho
The First Avenger was set in World War II got damn some of you don't know shyt about shyt lol
So nothing that your saying is accurate and you want others to agree with you ? I guess rags was late to the party because drive came out long time ago ?Who gives a fukk what war it was, the concept of a world War was the same
I'm not talking about literal comparisons, I'm taking about the presentation of the movie.
But They showed maxwell lord who appears to be big bad of movieI'm thinking they want to save the look of the Cheetah character until closer to the film's release and that is the only reason we didn't get any shots of her.
Doesn't necessarily mean the character won't end up being a flop like Ares ended up being at the end of the first movie though.
I doubt Maxwell is going to have a physical transformation like Cheetah thoughBut They showed maxwell lord who appears to be big bad of movie
Do you expect an explanation in the trailer.?They do kinda hint it has something to do with Maxwell Lord.The trailer looked good...
But it still doesn't answer HOW steve trevor got into the future... WTF
Do you expect an explanation in the trailer.?They do kinda hint it has something to do with Maxwell Lord.