i don't remember, but i've completely lost my mind by this point, as several people have noted@Call Me James remember when Donald was supposed to be like Snow White and the Middle East was going to be the 7 dwarfs and Donald was going to come down hard on Israel and not be beholden to Israel because America First and he's rich and stuff?
That's what I remember
I think even @Berniewood Hogan was on that train
I should pull up posts, but that was the common theme.@Call Me James remember when Donald was supposed to be like Snow White and the Middle East was going to be the 7 dwarfs and Donald was going to come down hard on Israel and not be beholden to Israel because America First and he's rich and stuff?
That's what I remember
I think even @Berniewood Hogan was on that train
Why do people keep saying this? What are the big issues the supreme court will be deciding on in the next generation that Trump is undoubtedly worse than Clinton on? On government spying and surveillance they're both on the same side. Trump doesn't have a problem with gay marriage. His hatred of Obamacare is political, he himself has said he wants to put in universal healthcare, which is further left than Hillary. Climate change is a legit area where Trump seems to be very conservative, but otherwise, he's not some dyed in the wool uber Conservative. He's not Ted Cruz. There's a reason why the Republican establishment fought like hell to deny this guy the nomination, they hate him just as much as the Democrats do. Donald was a Democrat raised in one of the most liberal enclave in America for the vast majority of his life. He's donning a conservative identity because the political landscape requires it, but if you watch him, his instincts are idiosyncratic and more based in liberal ideology than conservative ideology. He's more Huey Long than Barry Goldwater.
Clinton is a neo-liberal hawk, possibly the worst combination for the most vulnerable members of a nation. When she sets about invading Syria, who will be sent to the frontlines? When she signs in TPP 2.0, who will be hit hardest by being forced to compete with 3rd world workers? When she gives amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants so that the corporate class has their cheap labour, whose jobs are they taking? I'm not a Republican, but people should really look at these issues in-depth instead of just parroting media narratives of Adolph Trump. He's a populist, not a conservative. If you feel more comfortable voting for a neo-liberal over a populist, then more power to you, but let's be realistic.
You shut it the f_ck DOWN with this post.
Edited to add: Dammit, this site won't let me + rep you.![]()
I don't care who he votes for, but he will always have my respect. Personally, I'm voting for Trump (Because of Trade, less hawkish foreign policy, and anti TPP stance) , but I plan to run for local office once I move to Mass as an Independent.
P.S. stop trolling @ThreeLetterAgency AKA Napoleon.
Napoleon cant wait for Hillary to put troops in Syria.
It's been proven that Clinton's policies are more hawkish than Trump's.
President Trump has obviously turned out to be more of a hawk than Candidate Trump, but the idea that Hillary Clinton would have been a definite and marked improved in this area doesn't seem based in reality. She was consistently one of the most hawkish voices in the Obama administration and behind his worst foreign policy moves.
Some of these new liberal posters were heavy into Trumpset.
President Trump has obviously turned out to be more of a hawk than Candidate Trump, but the idea that Hillary Clinton would have been a definite and marked improved in this area doesn't seem based in reality. She was consistently one of the most hawkish voices in the Obama administration and behind his worst foreign policy moves.
Clinton says U.S. could totally obliterate Iran - Reuters
Like, this is pretty indistinguishable from the rhetoric coming out of the Trump administration.
But w/e, she lost and the Bolton/Pompeo/Trump regime needs to be counteracted.
Nah, I'm not gonna capitulate on this. Hillary Clinton and the Washington DC foreign policy establishment have committed horrific atrocities across the globe and absolutely do not deserve to have their sins and blood washed off their hands by the ineptitude of President Trump's administration. This is the exact same shyt Bush apologists try to do, and I cannot stand down on this. Bush and Clinton have more international blood on their hands than Trump (so far), and their ideology must be defeated. Trump cannot rehabilitate the images of these ghouls. I don't give a shyt how many negs I get because of this.just hold the L breh
Nah, I'm not gonna capitulate on this. Hillary Clinton and the Washington DC foreign policy establishment have committed horrific atrocities across the globe and absolutely do not deserve to have their sins and blood washed off their hands by the ineptitude of President Trump's administration. This is the exact same shyt Bush apologists try to do, and I cannot stand down on this. Bush and Clinton have more international blood on their hands than Trump (so far), and their ideology must be defeated. Trump cannot rehabilitate the images of these ghouls. I don't give a shyt how many negs I get because of this.
Nah, I'm not gonna capitulate on this. Hillary Clinton and the Washington DC foreign policy establishment have committed horrific atrocities across the globe and absolutely do not deserve to have their sins and blood washed off their hands by the ineptitude of President Trump's administration. This is the exact same shyt Bush apologists try to do, and I cannot stand down on this. Bush and Clinton have more international blood on their hands than Trump (so far), and their ideology must be defeated. Trump cannot rehabilitate the images of these ghouls. I don't give a shyt how many negs I get because of this.
Some of these new liberal posters were heavy into Trumpset.
I think you were just caught in another quote.???
If anything I'm criticizing napoleon (and Hillary to a lesser extent).
I havent read this thread lately. I dont know the context here or the quote you took of mine from years ago apparently.