MY nikka RAGNAR LOTHBREH GONNA fukk UP HIS bytch nikka BROTHER HOE-LO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Watch it. Its like Game of Thrones without the fantasy.this show came recommended to me, anyone else co sign? no spoilers
Watch it. Its like Game of Thrones without the fantasy.
One of the best new shows from last year.
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.
This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review
the wife if you want to call her that was an interesting character to meCan't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.
This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review
you're probably going to have to give black sails a second season pass as wellI can't wait til this new season drop so I can throw that boring ass Black Sails into the bushes.
My thing is she's decent but would get a better opportunity to shine with better writing. It's interesting to watch Vikings looting and plundering, but things got boring with the lack of intrigue and not very complex characters. If you're not gonna show blood and t*ts, you better give your actors something to do and good dialogue. Maybe they haven't figured it out because they're barbarians and can't make them too smart. They had their moments but I expected more from Vikings.the wife if you want to call her that was an interesting character to me
as i said before i only cared to watched the show when they were looting and plundering
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.
This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review
I wouldn't be hating had there been a couple haters in this thread and a 7.2 rating on IMDB. This is a decent show in need of better writing. The same goes for TWD but at least the highs were much higher. Spartacus surprisingly became great, Vikings had promise and went nowhere.your a hater out of all teh trash on tv you throw dirt on vikings? the show is great esp for being a history channel show, Of course it is way below spartacus, the budget for spartacus was massive, and was much more violent and it was on a premium cable channel so they could do whatever.
my man basically read the ign review and came over here and paraphrased it trying to sound intelligentyour a hater out of all teh trash on tv you throw dirt on vikings? the show is great esp for being a history channel show, Of course it is way below spartacus, the budget for spartacus was massive, and was much more violent and it was on a premium cable channel so they could do whatever.
I wouldn't be hating had there been a couple haters in this thread and a 7.2 rating on IMDB. This is a decent show in need of better writing. The same goes for TWD but at least the highs were much higher. Spartacus surprisingly became great, Vikings had promise and went nowhere.