Official Vikings Season 3 Thread

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,291
Reputation
5,103
Daps
56,788
Reppin
Lauderdale
I can't wait til this new season drop so I can throw that boring ass Black Sails into the bushes.
 

Muzion

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,266
Reputation
20
Daps
3,024
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.

This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review
 
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
6,141
Reputation
4,770
Daps
25,897
Reppin
Charlotte, North Carolina
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.

This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review

nikka JUST WAIT UNTIL THIS SEASON

BIGGER BUDGET, MORE fukkERY, AND LOTS MORE fukkING UP BRITISH nikkaS

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 

daemonova

hit it, & I didn't go Erykah Badu crazy, #yallmad
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
41,465
Reputation
3,271
Daps
68,485
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.

This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review
the wife if you want to call her that was an interesting character to me

as i said before i only cared to watched the show when they were looting and plundering
 

Muzion

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,266
Reputation
20
Daps
3,024
the wife if you want to call her that was an interesting character to me

as i said before i only cared to watched the show when they were looting and plundering
My thing is she's decent but would get a better opportunity to shine with better writing. It's interesting to watch Vikings looting and plundering, but things got boring with the lack of intrigue and not very complex characters. If you're not gonna show blood and t*ts, you better give your actors something to do and good dialogue. Maybe they haven't figured it out because they're barbarians and can't make them too smart. They had their moments but I expected more from Vikings.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,409
Reputation
30,738
Daps
759,244
Reppin
Top 4
Can't believe this show is universally praised around here. Started watching it off the strength of this thread and IMDB's high rating, but found it way overrated. Lack of budget isn't synonymous with spotty pacing and weak character development. If this weren't a show about Vikings nobody would be watching this. There are no more than 3 interesting characters (Ragnar, his brother, and Floki), as they ruined the priest toward season's end. Addressing the Vikings' faith is interesting, but it's all they ever talk about. They could have used this time so we could get to know a couple more characters.

This is way below Spartacus, hopefully with a bigger budget it will get better in the second season. The IGN is pretty much spot on.

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/02/vikings-season-1-review

your a hater out of all teh trash on tv you throw dirt on vikings? the show is great esp for being a history channel show, Of course it is way below spartacus, the budget for spartacus was massive, and was much more violent and it was on a premium cable channel so they could do whatever.
 

Muzion

All Star
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,266
Reputation
20
Daps
3,024
your a hater out of all teh trash on tv you throw dirt on vikings? the show is great esp for being a history channel show, Of course it is way below spartacus, the budget for spartacus was massive, and was much more violent and it was on a premium cable channel so they could do whatever.
I wouldn't be hating had there been a couple haters in this thread and a 7.2 rating on IMDB. This is a decent show in need of better writing. The same goes for TWD but at least the highs were much higher. Spartacus surprisingly became great, Vikings had promise and went nowhere.
 

69 others

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,490
Reputation
716
Daps
23,958
Reppin
NULL
your a hater out of all teh trash on tv you throw dirt on vikings? the show is great esp for being a history channel show, Of course it is way below spartacus, the budget for spartacus was massive, and was much more violent and it was on a premium cable channel so they could do whatever.
my man basically read the ign review and came over here and paraphrased it trying to sound intelligent
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,409
Reputation
30,738
Daps
759,244
Reppin
Top 4
I wouldn't be hating had there been a couple haters in this thread and a 7.2 rating on IMDB. This is a decent show in need of better writing. The same goes for TWD but at least the highs were much higher. Spartacus surprisingly became great, Vikings had promise and went nowhere.

i remember when i first started watching spartacus it wa skind of boring, the cgi was :scusthov: and it was kind of boring, but it gained on me and it is on my mt rushmore of tv shows.

for being on teh history channel vikings was great, and i expect much better things now. it alrad yhad a 40 million budget for season 1 so history did invest in it
 
Top