Official UFC on FOX: Gustafsson vs Rumble Thread (Sat, Jan. 24)

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    45

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,208
Reputation
3,673
Daps
37,817
and your reading fukin sux cuz if you bothered you will see this whole conversation stems from me saying they did it specifically for the Boston faithfuls for obvious reasons

No. Any time you've commented on 2 black fighters fighting each other, it's always why they gotta match this black fighter with that black fighter. You say it as though they do it on purpose.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
No. Any time you've commented on 2 black fighters fighting each other, it's always why they gotta match this black fighter with that black fighter. You say it as though they do it on purpose.
Thats the trap you habitually fall into, you critique the messenger as opposed to the message. You failed to comprehend a comment I made pertaining to a specific topic which was valid, Boston is a racist city and 2 sets of black on black violence on 1 card was clearly to curry favour. Because I have touched on it in the past u have chosen to side step that to discuss the booking of 2 black fighters in general = redundant discourse
 

The Infamous

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
12,208
Reputation
3,673
Daps
37,817
Thats the trap you habitually fall into, you critique the messenger as opposed to the message. You failed to comprehend a comment I made pertaining to a specific topic which was valid, Boston is a racist city and 2 sets of black on black violence on 1 card was clearly to curry favour. Because I have touched on it in the past u have chosen to side step that to discuss the booking of 2 black fighters in general = redundant discourse

That would make sense if this was your first time making that type of statement. But it's not. You've done it multiple times in the past.
 
Top