Official Tucker Carlson Thread

[Robbie3000]

If you’re an honest actor, explain to me why I should not post Tucker Carlson updates. Here are the main reasons why I watch the show.

1.Tucker is very funny and clever in a goofy corny nerdy bow tie way. He was doing a segment about the Human Rights Council (a pro lgbtq org) and kept calling them HRC; showing how both name sakes have the same fund raising apparatus. No left wing talking head can do anything like that. All they make is orange man jokes.

2. He is informative. I didn’t know that the head of Disney (or one of the heads) had 2 queer children, 1 trans child, and 1 pansexual child, according to HER. That is the type of information needed to draw conclusions on intent by Disney wrt what they think is best for children.

3. People including myself have been censored for simply putting forth anti Nato arguments. I would have just posted sporadic videos in the thread if that weren’t the case but now I have my own thread.

At #1 and #2


There is nothing funny or informative about Tucker. This is all wrassling to him and isn’t even that good. He is Jeff Jarret status.

But I get it, sometimes these uptight Democratic robots deserve to get trolled.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

If you’re an honest actor, explain to me why I should not post Tucker Carlson updates. Here are the main reasons why I watch the show.

1.Tucker is very funny and clever in a goofy corny nerdy bow tie way. He was doing a segment about the Human Rights Council (a pro lgbtq org) and kept calling them HRC; showing how both name sakes have the same fund raising apparatus. No left wing talking head can do anything like that. All they make is orange man jokes.

2. He is informative. I didn’t know that the head of Disney (or one of the heads) had 2 queer children, 1 trans child, and 1 pansexual child, according to HER. That is the type of information needed to draw conclusions on intent by Disney wrt what they think is best for children.

3. People including myself have been censored for simply putting forth anti Nato arguments. I would have just posted sporadic videos in the thread if that weren’t the case but now I have my own thread.

1. Telling on yourself here. You don't listen to left wing media at all. You're not fukking slick

2. He spews propaganda and white supremacist doctrine, if that is informative to you well.... that tells all of us who you really are and it's just another reason why this thread 100% needs to be deleted. You're attempting to spread white supremacist doctrine and misinformation under the guise of "learning about what the other is saying."

3. There's a right wing thread for this kind of stuff. Keep it there. Have a nice day, and I don't give a shyt if you were censored because I'm not the one censoring you. There are plenty of people who have anti nato sentiments on both sides of the political compass for various reasons.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

At #1 and #2


There is nothing funny or informative about Tucker. This is all wrassling to him and isn’t even that good. He is Jeff Jarret status.

But I get it, sometimes these uptight Democratic robots deserve to get trolled.

Except this guy isn't trolling. He's making claims he was censored for anti Nato sentiments when we have admitted rapists posting currently on TLR. I think it's BS and I'm just not buying it. 1 and 2 are him straight up telling on himself. Once again this thread needs to go.

 

[Won Won]

Funny, clever, smart

This passive aggressive attention-whoring is wild for HL

 

[Broke Wave]

1. Telling on yourself here. You don't listen to left wing media at all. You're not fukking slick

2. He spews propaganda and white supremacist doctrine, if that is informative to you well.... that tells all of us who you really are and it's just another reason why this thread 100% needs to be deleted. You're attempting to spread white supremacist doctrine and misinformation under the guise of "learning about what the other is saying."

3. There's a right wing thread for this kind of stuff. Keep it there. Have a nice day, and I don't give a shyt if you were censored because I'm not the one censoring you. There are plenty of people who have anti nato sentiments on both sides of the political compass for various reasons.

What counts as left wing media now is not what I ascribe to at all, you’re right. I don’t like MSNBC or Majority report etc. To me Tucker is funny and clever full stop.

2. You’re probably( no offense)a white person telling me I can’t agree with Tucker on this issue because he is a white supremacist. That alone is a claim that needs to be discussed on its own merits but that is a total deflection from me saying he is informative. He informed me of this situation wrt Disney and then targeting children and sexuality.
3. I’m not posting in a designated free speech zone because you don’t like seeing my thread, my one thread (maybe 2) on the first page.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

"You're a white person because you think agreeing with a white supremacist/Nazi on white supremacist/Nazi doctrine is bad"

These Russian bots gets less and less creative.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

I like his Russia takes, it's refreshing to hear a MSM host that's anti-war.

Carlson is anti-war like German American Bunds were anti-war. Their version of anti-war is "Let the aggressor take what it wants and the resister is wrong for resisting".

Tucker (and Tulsi...and Greenwald) also were vociferous defenders of the War on Terror. Carlson called Iraquis, "semiliterate primitive monkeys"

 

[Spade281]

Still dont know why people watch this actor. He is a clown and son of a cia agent (hence why he's on tv in the first place). Paid to rile up people and laugh about it once the cameras start rolling. He might take the opposite stance but thats what hes paid to do

 

[Mike Nasty]

He is a clown and son of a cia agent (hence why he's on tv in the first place).

Not the CIA but the Director of the USIA.

United States Information Agency - Wikipedia
President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the United States Information Agency in 1953, during the postwar tensions with the communist world known as the Cold War.[2][3] The USIA's mission was "to understand, inform and influence foreign publics in promotion of the national interest, and to broaden the dialogue between Americans and U.S. institutions, and their counterparts abroad".[4] The USIA was established "to streamline the U.S. government's overseas information programs, and make them more effective".[4] The USIA was the largest full-service public relations organization in the world, spending over $2 billion per year to highlight the views of the U.S. while diminishing those of the Soviet Union, through about 150 different countries.[2]

but you're right, it explains how this clown always managed to be on some network.

 

[Voice of Reason]

Cac went full white nationalistic

 

[Voice of Reason]

This dumb fakkit @Broke Wave is a Tucker Carlson stan



You are lauding a cac that thinks you are inherently low iq and inferior

 

[Voice of Reason]

Carlson is anti-war like German American Bunds were anti-war. Their version of anti-war is "Let the aggressor take what it wants and the resister is wrong for resisting".

Tucker (and Tulsi...and Greenwald) also were vociferous defenders of the War on Terror. Carlson called Iraquis, "semiliterate primitive monkeys"

Characterizing Greenwald as a defender of the war on terror is a blatant lie.


Greenwald is a piece of shyt now but he's not a defender of the war on terror

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Cac went full white nationalistic

What in the fukk did I just listen to, the daily klavern?

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Characterizing Greenwald as a defender of the war on terror is a blatant lie.


Greenwald is a piece of shyt now but he's not a defender of the war on terror

"I had not abandoned my trust in the Bush administration. Between the president’s performance in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the swift removal of the Taliban in Afghanistan..."

"I wanted the president to succeed, because my loyalty is to my country and he was the leader of my country, I still gave the administration the benefit of the doubt."

He admits that he was for it before he was against it. Greenwald has always been a piece of shyt. He, like Tulsi, has a soft spot for the extreme right.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

What in the fukk?