I just read up on it, he don’t have to be convicted in order to be barred from office.. They would take a separate vote with a simple majorityWould have to be convicted. Any manner of crook practically can hold high political office.
I just read up on it, he don’t have to be convicted in order to be barred from office.. They would take a separate vote with a simple majorityWould have to be convicted. Any manner of crook practically can hold high political office.
I just read up on it, he don’t have to be convicted in order to be barred from office.. They would take a separate vote with a simple majority
"Lets build our own city. Let's build our own BACKUP CITY IN SOUTH AMERICA".. fukkin random
Just doubles down on the insanity
I just read up on it, he don’t have to be convicted in order to be barred from office.. They would take a separate vote with a simple majority
I just looked it up. The only reasonable way to block Trump from future federal office is through conviction then barring.I only had time to look at one source but it agreed with you, so I hope you're right. It may get fought out in the courts though and would go all the way to SCOTUS if so, and even though they mostly left the election fukkery alone I can't trust BeerBoy Kavanaugh, Amy Covid Barrett and the rest of them nikkas
If the senate fail to convict on needing 67 senators can Trump still be barred from future office with a simple majority vote? Or would he have to convicted first?