Official Trump Insurrection Rally 1/6/21 Fukkery, NY Probe, DOJ Probe & Georgia Probe Thread!

[jerniebert]

Peter Navarro is giving Rudy a run for his money in who can come off looking crazier at press conferences. This is a Harvard grad.

 

[Conz]

Navarro unraveled in real time during the Trump regime. no one was ever "normal" but i'm pretty sure he was evenkeel at first, and every time you saw him he would get nuttier and nuttier.

 

[Arianne Martell]

 

[bnew]

Spoiler: larger image

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

Please please indict this POS for obstruction

GDPR Support

www.ajc.com

r ago
X


Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis Thursday blasted a congressman who has pledged to investigate her handling of an indictment of former President Donald Trump and others.
U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, recently demanded records of Willis’ communication with Justice Department officials who have also indicted Trump for his role in an alleged scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Jordan suggested Willis is attempting to interfere with the 2024 election – Trump is the front-runner for the Republican nomination. And he said her investigation could infringe on the free speech and other rights of Trump and other defendants.

On Thursday, Willis fired back, saying Jordan’s Aug. 24 letter included “inaccurate information and misleading statements.” She accused Jodan of improperly interfering with a state criminal case and attempting to punish her for personal political gain.
“Its obvious purpose is to obstruct a Georgia criminal proceeding and to advance outrageous misrepresentations,” Willis wrote of Jordan letter. “As I make clear below, there is no justification in the Constitution for Congress to interfere with a state criminal matter, as you attempt to do.”

Jordan’s letter came 10 days after a Fulton County grand jury indicted Trump and 18 others for their roles in an alleged scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Willis didn’t pull punches in her response.
“Your letter makes clear that you lack a basic understanding of the law, its practice and the ethical obligations of attorneys generally and prosecutors specifically,” she wrote.

 

[Spidey Man]

Spoiler: larger image

Proud Boy lawyers got their degrees at Trump U

 

[Payday23]

The update

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

 

[mastermind]

I got the same question: why is this only a civil case? This is a criminal act she is alleging.

 

[Payday23]

Lindsey escaped justice

 

[Worthless Loser]

 

[Nero Christ]

Loeffler & Purdue should've been in jail for using Covid info for their investment portfolio benefits.

 

[Payday23]

I bet they all sung like birds

 

[Bleed The Freak]

She ain't want the GOP Senate/House going scorched Earth on her.

Sadly she knew what would have happened.

They'd have changed the whole constitutional rules on the spot she'd have did that. Even without 67 votes.

 

[Worthless Loser]

She ain't want the GOP Senate/House going scorched Earth on her.

Sadly she knew what would have happened.

They'd have changed the whole constitutional rules on the spot she'd have did that. Even without 67 votes.

Lindsay got off due to the speech and debate clause for sitting US Senators/House members in the Constitution. It limits what you can go after them for because they can claim they were performing their duties as an elected official. The judge ruled that Lindsay had to testify, but that the clause did provide Lindsay some protections. She likely didn't feel she could get a conviction for Lindsay due to that.