Followed this trial closely, but I don't understand, on on level, or two, the jury believes that he did everything but insert himself, or his hands in her vagina, or was the jury not asked anything on that technical aspect or not, as in, he was liable for the battery of the woman, and the defamation, and they found him liable on both counts
The phrasing I read made it seem like they had the option it find him guilty of penetrative rape, and didn't which is a weird distinction. Like he had her in the room, he pulled her tights, he shoved her against the wall, but didn't insert his fingers in her vagina?