How?
"Pressuring foreign leaders"..."In Washington DC"..meanwhile..Trump was in a different state.
So an authoritarian who promises to engineer more money to the top is the better of two bad optionsCorrection...I chose the better of two bad options.....No regrets
let me put it to you this way, if the repubs impeach trump that will be the least of our concerns.... the only way trump gets impeached is if he does something really horrific like start a war with iran and shyt doesn't go sweet, meanwhile the economy completely tanks... if you hear the repubs seriously talking about impeachment then it is already too late...Republicans will get some blue dogs to push the impeachment
So an authoritarian who promises to engineer more money to the top is the better of two bad options
Jesus Christ dude, I was one of the biggest Clinton critics on here and I consider her a war criminal on top of being neo-liberal globalist but at least I was smart enough to grasp that at the end of the day, she was a better option by a snails hair than an authoritarian narcissist who will use the state to enrich his coffers and get us in numerous global entanglements with his motley crue of neo-conservative hench men and his judeo-christian fundamentalist advisor BannonYes if his competition was a corrupt criminal warlord ...NVM...i wont go into details anymore because youre clearly one of the gullible people who didnt know what Hillary actually was...
youll just have to wait for PBS to make a Clinton Files documentary 20 years from now after she is dead to understand what kind of bullet we dodged.
Youll thank me and the other deplorables then
Total horseshyt... Look at the mindless lefty propaganda you regurgitate......"numerous global entanglements" "authoritarian narcissist" "enrich his coffers"...theres not a shred of PROOF any of it is likely to happenJesus Christ dude, I was one of the biggest Clinton critics on here and I consider her a war criminal on top of being neo-liberal globalist but at least I was smart enough to grasp that at the end of the day, she was a better option by a snails hair than an authoritarian narcissist who will use the state to enrich his coffers and get us in numerous global entanglements with his motley crue of neo-conservative hench men and his judeo-christian fundamentalist advisor Bannon
Goddamn you are fukking clueless
Blind deaf and dumb. Are you paying attention to the cabinet choices?Total horseshyt... Look at the mindless lefty propaganda you regurgitate......"numerous global entanglements" "authoritarian narcissist" "enrich his coffers"...theres not a shred of PROOF any of it is likely to happen
lets compare shall we
The man wants to work for a dollar..Hillary was shaking people down for millions as SoS
Trump told the syrian rebels"you on your own"..Hillary said Assad must go by any means necessary
Every mechanism controlled by the elite supported and actively worked to get Hillary into power..The media,Thinktanks ,corporations,wall street.even republican donors and big-shots...You think they have your interests at heart??
Youre right theres hypocrisy here...........find a mirror and see the butthurt liberal posing as a pseudosocialist
Blind deaf and dumb. Are you paying attention to the cabinet choices?
The only one i have trouble with is Bannon..but i give him the benefit of doubt on that....A chief of staff is basically a bagman....so he must choose someone who is smart,loyal and willing to hide the bodies....
Since the CoS serves only the president and NOT the public Trump has the right to hire and fire his own
You actually think Podesta was any better of a choice than Bannon??
At least Podesta doesn't want to enrich the military industrial complex openly by wanting to engage in a farcical theocratic based war with "radical Islam"
And Sessions? Pompeo. But are far worse than Bannon.