Well assassin-like activities were already going on prior to Bayek of Siwa so they left themselves open to explore that.So they released a game that is supposedly the origins of the creed and for their next game they set it before the “origins”
Makes no sense whatsoever...So they released a game that is supposedly the origins of the creed and for their next game they set it before the “origins”
Well assassin-like activities were already going on prior to Bayek of Siwa so they left themselves open to explore that.
Are they even running with that lore anymore though? I other than Origins the last one I beat was AC3 so I don't know what's been happening in the universe.I mean if they were going to do that they should have just set it in the first civilization during the human rebellion
Are they even running with that lore anymore though? I other than Origins the last one I beat was AC3 so I don't know what's been happening in the universe.
Origins is the origin of the Assassin brotherhood. Odyssey is just one of the many events that lead up to it's creationSo they released a game that is supposedly the origins of the creed and for their next game they set it before the “origins”
why the hell do we want assassin's creed games without the brotherhood?Origins is the origin of the Assassin brotherhood. Odyssey is just one of the many events that lead up to it's creation
because we like history, the lore, and it's fun.why the hell do we want assassin's creed games without the brotherhood?
ok get a bunch of random NPC's to form the exact same thing, using the same clothes, weapons, fighting techniques and verbiage... but lets not call them that in the past 2 games.. and lets not even go foward to tell the story, lets just start a new prequel that actually goes backwards, instead of getting to the actual origin
awesome