Missouri and five other states sued the Biden administration, seeking to block the student debt plan from going into effect.
www.wsj.com
Republican attorneys general in Missouri, Nebraska, Arkansas, South Carolina and Kansas, and an attorney representing Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, also a Republican, filed suit on behalf of their states in federal court in Missouri. The states are seeking the relief now since the Biden administration has indicated it will start rolling out the
debt cancellation program in early October, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt said.
The lawsuit came as the administration released its own cost estimate of the plan, pinning the price of its program at $379 billion. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
released a similar estimate of around $400 billion earlier this week.
Other estimates have ranged broadly, owing to uncertainties about how many people will choose to enroll in the program. A separate aspect of Biden’s student debt plans could push the total cost of his recent policy changes to around $1 trillion, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, an analysis frequently cited by policy makers.
Other conservative legal challenges are expected after the administration makes a formal move toward cancellation, such as by releasing an application for borrowers to report their income. The Pacific Legal Foundation, a libertarian nonprofit law firm,
sued Tuesday in federal court in Indiana.
“The Biden administration’s executive action to cancel student loan debt was not only unconstitutional, it will unfairly burden working-class families,” Mr. Schmitt said. Mr. Schmitt is also a Republican candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in Missouri.
If a court acts on the lawsuit, it could stall the Biden administration’s effort to cancel up to $20,000 of student debt for borrowers who make under $125,000, or $250,000 for a married couple. The plan, announced in August, is expected to go into effect in October, just weeks before the midterm elections. An estimated 20 million borrowers—around half of all individuals with federal student debt—could see their
balances wiped out, according to the White House. Borrowers who received Pell grants for low-income students are eligible for up to $20,000 in relief, while non-Pell borrowers are eligible for up to $10,000.
The lawsuit is the latest challenge to the president’s program. The plaintiff in the Pacific Legal case is a property-rights lawyer with the foundation and a federal student loan borrower who claims that canceling $20,000 of his outstanding loans would make him liable for more than $1,000 in state income tax.
The Justice Department responded to that lawsuit by noting that borrowers don’t have to participate in the program, and even the eight million who are eligible for automatic relief because the government already has their financial information may choose to opt out.