Official Fantasy Football Random Thoughts Thread

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,337
Reputation
5,654
Daps
95,730
3-1 :myman:

Thinking of starting Edelman this week with Brady back...They play Cleveland and you know Brady is going to throw a ton to get his in game reps in...

That said Mckinnon also makes for an interesting start...Osweiler isn't putting up points on that Viking defense...Mckinnon could easily get another 18+ touches in this game and Houston run D got torched by Spary tan Murray last week for 95/2...

Decisions...:jbhmm:
 

str8up

dial 1900-raekwon
Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
13,808
Reputation
3,760
Daps
42,722
Man if Julio could have had 20 last week and 20 this week I'd be undefeated

Instead I beat dude by like 100 this week and got fukked last week by literally every player except Christine Michael :mjcry:
 

J Money

No weapon formed against me shall prosper
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
9,069
Reputation
2,099
Daps
36,011
Do y'all think Terrence West would be a good pickup?
 

J Money

No weapon formed against me shall prosper
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
9,069
Reputation
2,099
Daps
36,011
Any time you got a chance at the lead back of a squad, you find a way to put him on your roster (unless you're in a shallow league). I think he has a solid Week 5. Dixon doesn't scare me this week.
If u got room on your bench and lacking in the RB department...

I managed to pick him up of waivers and might start him this week. The reason I need him is because Mark Ingram is on a bye. My other RBs are Ryan Mathews, Eddie Lacy, Tevin Coleman.

I would start Coleman but that sickle cell shyt and going to Denver makes me thing he won't play much this weekend
 

VBM

┌∩┐(●_●)┌∩┐
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
11,888
Reputation
2,895
Daps
29,291
Reppin
Dallas by way of Houston by way of San Antonio
I managed to pick him up of waivers and might start him this week. The reason I need him is because Mark Ingram is on a bye. My other RBs are Ryan Mathews, Eddie Lacy, Tevin Coleman.

I would start Coleman but that sickle cell shyt and going to Denver makes me thing he won't play much this weekend

Yeah, I'm starting him in place of Ingram as well. It's a coin flip between him and Lacy, but West has the better matchup against that Washington defense. If you're favored to win, I'd probably play it safe with Lacy just because his role is established. If you need a home run, West would be my pick.
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,730
Reppin
Houston
Guy in my league already moving on from OBJ:leon:
Dude is sitting at 34th WR in standard. Wouldn't be in the top 5 if he scored 3 touchdowns with 120 yards this week either :damn:
 

Izanami

Superstar
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
12,823
Reputation
1,530
Daps
38,222
Guy in my league already moving on from OBJ:leon:
Dude is sitting at 34th WR in standard. Wouldn't be in the top 5 if he scored 3 touchdowns with 120 yards this week either :damn:

ODB had similar numbers at this time last year so I would give it at least couple more weeks..
 

J Money

No weapon formed against me shall prosper
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
9,069
Reputation
2,099
Daps
36,011
Brehs ive been chopping and changing my lineup all week and I'm still not sure if I should start Deandre Hopkins. What would y'all do?

Currently I have Emmanuel Sanders (Atl) and Travis Benjamin (@Oakland) as my WRs and Kyle Rudolph in my Flex. Should I start Nuk?
 

VBM

┌∩┐(●_●)┌∩┐
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
11,888
Reputation
2,895
Daps
29,291
Reppin
Dallas by way of Houston by way of San Antonio
Brehs ive been chopping and changing my lineup all week and I'm still not sure if I should start Deandre Hopkins. What would y'all do?

Currently I have Emmanuel Sanders (Atl) and Travis Benjamin (@Oakland) as my WRs and Kyle Rudolph in my Flex. Should I start Nuk?

I'd start Sanders. Minny is locking people down, Benjamin's targets are too hit or miss, and I trust Houston's defense more than Atlanta's, which is the tiebreaker for Sanders/Rudolph.
 
Top