So, I was supposed to be taking the week off, but whatever...
Again, we have people who never bother to join the telegram, attend the livestreams, check the token's blockchain footprint, dive into the litany of information available about Coli token---but then they come into this thread questioning my integrity and aspects of said project. A lot of these same people are in the SAITAMA and SHIB threads and don't carry the same inhibitions.
Being doxxed is arbitrary standard of trustworthiness. If you're basing the probability or likelihood of a dev team rugpulling based on "photos" of them, or seeing their actual face, then the parameters upon which you place trustworthiness is critically flawed. Crypto is unregulated. And I would argue that a scammer would show little inhibitions to revealing themselves if it meant checking the box for people like you, whose primary barrier to invest is based on their physical appearance, when rug pulling isn't technically illegal. Showing or not showing their faces wouldn't make them any less likely to pull liquidity if they're already set to do it---especially true if they're living abroad.
I, and other project heads, choose to not show our faces or "reveal" our identities for many valid reasons. It's not inherently criminal to want to remain private on the internet. People erroneously base the morality, or philosophy, of being doxxed on the idea that a crypto token is an organization with CEOs or executives. But in fact, if all projects were treated with the same fundamental principles of bitcoin, then we would all be anonymous.
If your personal barriers to entry include seeing someone's face, that's your right. But I would argue that what the data for a project shows is far more important when deciding whether to get involved with it.
I don't know if you're just making stuff up or not, but this is patently false. I can't touch my liquidity, no matter what I do. It's locked, and it will stay that way. My wallet has interacted with the deeplock.io smart contract, effectively disabling my ability to withdraw funds. I just don't understand why people make stuff up to prove a point.
I've explained this a dozen times, over text, over video, over livestream. At the risk of not convincing you either way, I won't bother going over it again.
It's funny to me.. No one who I've quoted has bothered to research anything about the project. Not join the telegram, not the numerous livestreams, watch the classes I've given or chart performance videos, read the updates, check the BSC blockchain under my address (which is public!). Haven't bothered to reach out to me directly either. In my opinion, their questions don't necessitate a response when they haven't made any good faith effort to understand what the project is. I've gotten on a phone call with every single person who reached out and wanted to talk to me. I would afford the same courtesy to you blackpearl, Unchosen, and whoever else bothers to come in and skip over 17 pages of information to question my integrity. We can talk.
The Marketing/Dev Wallet is for...well, yes, for marketing. That means you spend the funds on promotion, advertising, etc. Again, this is all public on the blockchain. Also, there's an anti-dumping mechanism written in the contract. I've implemented it after we had to deal with a sniping bot that swooped in once the COLI/BNB pair was created. This is all information I could've dispense to you if just reached out to me. And it's not hidden info. It's right there on the website, front-and-center. You're given all the information you need to make a decision. Now if you personally don't like projects with dev wallets, its within your right to not get involved. But not everything is criminal based.
These constant questions of
'what if this happens' are irrefutable. Like, I can't prove that it won't happen because nothing I say will be good enough. And nothing I do will be good enough because you won't be satisfied until something bad
does happen. All the other crypto projects you're invested in right now have to act against those same questions. Does doxxing answer those concerns? Does eliminating a dev wallet answer those concerns? And if so, then you have arbitrary standards There will always be a what-if. I have
LOCKED my liquidity, and that STILL wasn't good enough for one of you. So it's pointless trying to prove much of anything to someone who will just move to the next 'what-if' scenario.
You can contend that I am asking people for money, so scrutiny should not only be expected, it should be necessary.
First, I would say I never once asked anyone for money. I presented a project to the community, made my pitch, gave my philosophy, supplied details, and left it to them to decide. I even went as far to airdrop over a billion COLI to over 50 different addresses.
All money from own pocket. Spending $3.00 to send someone COLI that was worth 0.003¢
But none of these details make it to people who carry an abundance of skepticism but no ounce of inquisitiveness. I accept scrutiny. I welcome it even. But only to people who do it in good-faith. To not do an inkling of research, but run up in here challenging my integrity tells me you have no real intention of getting involved, but to sow discord and distrust among the people who
HAVE put in the work to understand. People who
HAVE gotten on voice calls with me, sometimes
hour long convos, to try and understand. I've been on calls with some brothers who had no clue how crypto worked. They didn't even put money in COLI. they just needed help in general. No problem, I got you. Even
@Houston911 took the time to reach out to me in private. Didn't run up in here with baseless assertions, publicly assailing my credibility.
Hell, even he joined the telegram!
red flag as fukk