Official Climate Change Thread

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
15,812
Reputation
2,820
Daps
88,012
Two million in Zimbabwe’s capital have no water as city turns off taps
Published on 15/07/2019, 11:42am

‘The situation is bad, period’, says spokesman for Harare council, as suburbs go weeks without water and cases of typhoid are reported

city-568208_1280-1.jpg

Harare (Photo: Pixabay)

By Sophie Mbugua

More than two million residents around Zimbabwe’s capital have no access to running water, as drought and breakdowns push the city system to collapse.

Just 50% of 4.5 million people in Harare and four satellite towns currently have access to the municipal water supply, the city authority told Climate Home News.

“There is a rotational water supply within the five towns,” Harare city council corporate communications manager Michael Chideme said. “Some people are getting water five days a week especially in the western suburbs, but the northern suburbs are going for weeks without a drop in their taps.”

Climate news straight to your inbox? Sign up here

Chideme said people were either depending on water merchants, open wells, streams or several council-drilled boreholes. “The situation is bad, period!”

Dr Jean-Marie Kileshye from WaterNet warned Harare’s water was highly polluted: “Water-borne diseases linked to these boreholes are on the rise, but people have had to take in their own hands water supply because the utility has failed to provide water.”

Hardlife Mudzingwa, of Harare’s Community Water Alliance, said 10 typhoid cases were reported during the first week of July in the southwestern suburb of Glen View.

Cities around the world are facing increased water stress. Last week, the Indian city of Chennai began using trains to ferry in emergency supplies after rains failed. In 2018, Cape Town in South Africa avoided a city-wide water network shutdown by just a few months.

Zimbabwe is getting warmer as the climate changes and heavy rains and droughts are becoming more intense. In Harare, rains are expected in October at earliest, according to James Ngoma of the Zimbabwe Meteorological Services Department.

In 2018, a drought warning was issued to Zimbabwe by the Southern Africa Development Community. But those messages were not getting through, said Brad Garanganga, a climate scientist from Zimbabwe. Under-resourced meteorological departments had not been able to help policy makers “make decisions to take action on this type of important information ahead of time rather than wait until a crisis hit”.

Bringing you news from around the world is expensive… We’re an independent news outlet dedicated to the most important global stories. If you can spare even a few dollars each month, it would make a huge difference to us. Our Patreon account is a safe and easy way to support our work.

Harare obtains raw water from four dams: Harava, Seke, Chivero and Manyame. Harava and Seke are completely dry. This has led Harare city council to decommission the Prince Edward water treatment plant, which is fed by those dams.

This has left only one water treatment works – Morton Jaffray – supplying water to Harare and the four other satellite towns.

The dams that feed Morton Jaffray – Chivero and Manyame – are larger and closer to capacity, said Harare mayor Herbert Gomba. But they are “heavily polluted”, requiring more than 10 chemicals to purify. Upstream towns dump domestic, sewage, agricultural and mining waste into the rivers that feed the capital’s dams. The city is spending $3 million a month on water treatment chemicals, Gomba said, forcing it to restrict the amount released.

thumbnail_Decreased-water-levels-at-Lake-Chivero.-The-Dam-is-also-highly-polluted..jpg

Decreased water levels at the highly-polluted Lake Chivero (Photo: Justin Mutenda/Herald)

Harare’s daily demand is around 1,200 million litres (Ml). Gomba told CHN the city was producing around 450Ml a day. Last month, Harare City Council recommended the water situation be declared a national emergency.

Community organiser Mudzingwa said he believed the city supplies to be less than 100Ml/day. Companies that packaged and sold bottled water to supermarkets and hotels were still receiving municipal supplies, while residents saw their taps turned off, he claimed.

Harare’s water system was designed to service a population of 350,000 people, said Kileshye. The last upgrade was in 1994, but the country has since been in near-constant economic crisis. The city council’s website says some sections of infrastructure have been in use for more than 60 years, “way beyond their economic life of at least 15 years”.

Chennai: Trains deliver emergency water to drought-hit city

With this in mind, in 2011, the Zimbabwean government signed a loan of $144m from the China Export-Import (Exim) Bank to upgrade its water infrastructure.

The government has accessed $72m, according to Gomba, with which the Morton Jaffray water treatment plant was rehabilitated. But five distribution centres and two sewage treatment plants were yet to rehabilitated.

Mudzingwa raised questions over how the other half of the loan was administered, saying: “A 2014 internal audit report produced by City of Harare showed that there was inflating of quotations on materials that were bought through the loan. Corruption marred the water project with commodities overpriced, hence the government was not able to access the full amount.”

Climate Home News launches African reporting programme

Gomba rejected corruption allegations. “We never received liquid money, but equipment procured from China. It was due to the government’s inability to honour previous loans following the economic crisis that hindered access to the balance, not corruption.”

The mayor added that non-payment of residential and commercial rates was hampering his administration from effectively delivering water. Even after rehabilitation, he warned supplies from Prince Edward and Morton Jaffray works would reach only 770Ml per day, leaving a shortfall of 430Ml.

“We have to construct three new dams, to add about 840 million cubic metres. But over time Harare has to decommission the old dams and allow them time to rehabilitate naturally,” said the mayor.


Map: Two of Harare’s four reservoirs, Chivero and Manyame, seen to the west of the city, are heavily polluted.

In 2016, the Zimbabwean government signed a contract with a Chinese contractor Sinohydro to construct a dam northeast of the capital Harare. Mudzingwa said construction of Kunzvi-Musami Dam – 67 km outside Harare – was estimated to cost $850-900 million. But the project was not new.

“The discussion on the construction Kunzvi-Musami Dam as an alternative water source started as early as 1990 but is still not ready,” he said. “The central and local government have failed us on water supply.”

Mudzingwa agreed an urgent infrastructure upgrade was needed to solve the water challenges in Harare but he stressed the need for budget transparency. “We must also ensure citizens are involved actively in water governance framework and smart coordination between water sectors,” he said.

Council spokesperson Chideme said the city was running education programmes for citizens, “to minimize pollution of available water resources and while effectively using the available water sparingly so that we do not run out of water”.

“Technology by itself will not be good enough,” said WaterNet’s Kileshye. “The people across the whole spectrum from households, industries need to be made aware that they are part of the solution to sustainable water in cities.”

This article was produced as part of an African reporting programme supported by Future Climate for Africa.

We’ve changed our rules on republication. Please read them here.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,191
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,223
Reppin
Brooklyn
The New York Times
23 hrs ·
The Trump administration failed to follow ethics rules last year when it dismissed academic members of EPA advisory boards and replaced them with appointees connected to industry, a federal watchdog agency concluded.


About this website

NYTIMES.COM

E.P.A. Broke Rules in Shake-Up of Science Panels, Federal Watchdog Says
The Government Accountability Office found that the administration “did not consistently ensure” that appointees to E.P.A. advisory boards met federal ethics requirements.
 

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
15,812
Reputation
2,820
Daps
88,012
Why a hipster, vegan, green tech economy is not sustainable
Improving eco-efficiency within a capitalist growth-oriented system will not save the environment.

by Vijay Kolinjivadi
6 Jun 2019
db2453a4defb4036a2b73fba5392055b_18.jpg

Gentrification has already transformed the neighbourhood of Mile End in Montreal; a similar fate awaits Parc-Extension [Vijay Kolinjivadi/Al Jazeera]
On the western borderlands ofMontreal's well-to-do Outremont district and the ultra-hipsterised and gentrified Mile End lies an expanse of land where the University of Montrealis currently building a new science campus. Just across is Parc-Extension, one of Canada's poorest and most densely populated neighbourhoods and a port of call for many newly arrived immigrants.

The new campus has been touted as a model of "sustainable development". It boasts LEED-certified buildings to reduce environmental impact, rainwater collection structures, energy-efficient lighting and heat recycling, infrastructure for electric vehicles and bikes, lots of greenery, and overall, a minimal carbon footprint. A number of tech companies, including Microsoft's newAI Hub, are moving in and are expected to further enhance the "eco-efficiency" of the area.

The unspoken expectation is that once the green new campus is completed, capital and economic growth will naturally flow into the area. This means nearby neighbourhoods will get "revitalised", especially the poorer ones, like Parc-Extension.

Thus, immigrant-owned grocery stores, halal butcheries and community centres will soon be replaced by vegan chain restaurants, hip vintage clothing joints, organic food stores and coffee-shops galore, as landlords push out poor tenants to make space for more well-to-do ones.

Advertisement

In the process, the implicit socio-economic violence behind gentrification will be invariably "greenwashed" and presented as development that would make the area more "sustainable", "beautiful" and "modern".

Unfortunately, creation by destruction is what capitalism does best, and its damaging practices are anything but green. This market-driven "sustainable" vision of economic activity, ecological-conscious diets and "hipness" within modern capitalism reinforce inequality and still hurt the environment.

Before I proceed further with my argument, I should mention that I am an academic, living in a "hip" part ofMontreal and engage in activities that follow a particular aesthetic ethos, all of which make me very much a part of the reality I critique below. My aim is not to moralise, but rather to highlight the dangers of a political and economic system that profits from deceiving perhaps well-meaning self-proclaimed progressive folks into believing that a greener, more efficient capitalism is possible.

3558dd0f9cd04ba69196c5bb013c548c_18.jpg

The new science campus of University of Montreal as seen from Parc-Extension [Vijay Kolinjivadi/ Al Jazeera]


The illusion of 'sustainable development'
The term "sustainable development" was first introduced at the UN Earth Summit in 1992. At that time, Western governments espousing neoliberalism had just spent the whole previous decade dismantling unions, environmental regulations, and Keynesian welfare programmes and were looking to spread their practices elsewhere, as major geopolitical threats to a fully global and universal capitalist development trajectory were beginning to wane.

At the backdrop of these developments, concerns over environmental degradation and social inequality were coming to the fore and something had to be done about them.

The "solution" was to have one's cake and eat it too… that is, to paradoxically turn "social" and "green" values into new markets for expanding capital.

"Sustainable development" not only proposed that negative social and environmental impacts were mere "externalities" to the system that could be diminished through profit-oriented market-based mechanisms but also implied that there is no escaping a neoliberal development model.

Thus, environmental problems became framed as an issue of inefficiency that could be solved by technology and the better management of resources, which effectively neutralised the politically-oriented environmentalism of the 1960s and 1970s.

An elite cadre of policy experts, economists and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs took over the environmental issue and transformed it into another profit-making endeavour, presenting the expansion of capital as progress towards a more "sustainable" future.

In essence, environmentalism was and is consciously de-politicised for the purposes of expanding profit.

Part of the conceit surrounding apolitical techno-focused environmentalism centres on the idea of dematerialising economic growth through more efficient lifestyles and technologies. These include using the latest labour-saving apps on your phone, purchasing energy-saving appliances, eating vegan or organic food, and constructing buildings with lower negative environmental impact.

While these improvements in efficiency should indeed be applauded, they are not a solution to the major environmental problems we face today. This is because such "quick fixes" derive from the economic and political structures of capital expansion.

Growth-based economies are at the heart of environmental disasters we face today; making our goods, economic activity or infrastructure "greener" and more efficient without a major overhaul of the global economic system is not a long-term solution.

Improving efficiency would always involve maintaining and indeed expanding production to satisfy growing demand. This is reflected in the so-called "Jevons paradox", named after the 19th-century English economist William Stanley Jevons, who discovered that increasing energy efficiency also led to higher demand.

Today this "rebound effect" can be observed across economic sectors, as gains made due to enhanced efficiency are put back into use to fuel further growth. The higher efficiency of planes, cars and electronic devices is immediately offset by cheaper prices, resulting in an increase in demand and ultimately greater consumption of energy and resources. And within the globalised economic system we live in, the enhanced efficiency in one place often happens at the expense of growing inefficiency or waste in others.

In other words, the more efficient we are, the cheaper consumption gets, and in an economy predicated on endless growth, the more we consume and waste. The environment will always be at the losing endof this logic.

af8cfa9e1f384f2e90b4dc6c2b2c7209_18.jpg

The idea of 'sustainable development' has depoliticised environmentalism. In the photo above, demonstrators stage a blockade at the busy centre-city intersection of Broad and Chestnut streets in Philadelphia demanding a ban on automobiles on July 30, 1970 [AP/Bill Ingraham]


Working 'green'
When capitalism teams up with growth-oriented efficiency improvements, one result is the fabulous hipsterised "green tech" enclaves we see emerging in cities around the world, including Montreal.

These high-tech enterprises, along with the professions of the "creative class" (eg artists, musicians, academics, graphic designers etc), often concentrate in places where heavy industry and manufacturing have been shifted elsewhere in the same country or abroad. Rather than producing raw materials or manufactured goods, they focus on expert information provision.

Those who argue that growth can be accompanied by a dematerialising economic activity are convinced that these knowledge and creative classes of the service economy have somehow lower environmental impacts than those engaged in industrial agriculture or manufacturing (so-called "dirty" jobs). But is this information economy really any cleaner and greener?

Not really. This is because the resources they need to operate fundamentally depend on manufacturing and intensive agriculture located increasingly further away from their sites of operation, and often carry with them significant environmental impacts and exploitative labour practices.

Let us take the information economy's dependence on technology as an example. In their work, the creative classes both use and rely on the mass consumption of certain technological products, whose raw materials are extracted in war-torn places like the Democratic Republic of Congo and later assembled in places like China, where workers face precarious working conditions and inadequate pay.

High-tech devices may be advertised as extremely efficient, but the remarkably fast growth of the communications industry has not only increased the demand for material resources, boostingdangerous extractive industries in developing countries but also drastically expanded energy consumption. By 2020, IT would use as much as 20 percent of electricity globally, contributing significantly to carbon emissions.

This industry is also producing an ever-expanding amount of e-waste - currently the fastest-growing solid waste stream - which is shipped en masse to developing countries where it is polluting the environment andkilling workers that recycle it.

Green tech enclaves may appear to be materially light compared to manufacturing, industrial agriculture,or mineral extraction only because they rely on goods produced elsewhere, usually beyond national borders. But exporting "dirty production" abroad and keeping national records "cleaner" does not make the service industry any greener.

Indeed, the fact that Montreal is not buried in heaps of e-waste has little to do with the "green-ness" of the city and much more to do with the Canadian government's pernicious practiceof shipping refuse abroad.

e764035c4a014563beddf4dbc9ced0f2_18.jpg

Environmental activists protest against toxic waste shipped from Canada to the Philippines during a rally at the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in suburban Quezon city, northeast of Manila on July 20, 2015 [File: AP/Bullit Marquez]


Eating 'green'
In recent years, veganism has also been sucked into the profit-making "green" economy. Its rising popularity is indeed quite mind-boggling. What was traditionally seen as a subversive and anti-establishment form of resistance to the global food industry and its horrific abuse of animals has increasingly become a "cash cow".

The reason why veganism has gone so mainstream is because of how it has been presented - as a "win-win" strategy. It's good for your health, it's good for the planet, and it's good for the animals! What's not to love about it? Indeed, there's nothing not to love about veganism per se.

But going vegan within a growth-based economy does not save you from the "rebound effect".

According to Oxford researcher Marco Springmann, if the world were to turn vegan by 2050, it would save$1.5 trillion in health-care costs and climate change damages, as it would cut greenhouse emissions by two thirds.

But in a capitalist economy, such a surplus would never simply be left idle. It would be re-invested into further growth, which would still consume more resources, exploit workers and produce waste and damage the environment in one way or the other.

A growing demand for vegan products would also be devastating for biodiversity because it would rely on monoculture fruit and vegetable crops (particularly soybeans). It would also necessitate expanding arable land by cutting down forests and increase the consumption of water for agriculture. It would also deepen already existing labour exploitation of vulnerable populations and further encourage large landowners and corporations to abuse small-scale farmers.

The dairy-free products in the healthfood stores in Montreal's hip Plateau and Mile End districts are often tagged "cruelty-free", but they may not actually be. If no animals were abused in the making, that does not mean that humans and/or the environment weren't.

The cashews for that delicious non-dairy milk you buy likely come from India, where women work long hours in poor conditions to shell the nuts, enduring painful injuries from the acid released in the process. The almonds for the equally delicious almond option are likely sourced from drought-stricken California, where almond farming is one of the largest consumers of water.

Indeed, growth-oriented capitalism will "sell" you veganism as a noble practice that reflects your values and benefits your health, but it would not tell you the full story about the ongoing and long-term social and ecological consequences of industrial veganism.

6dc9eb7df8694562ab8926662ec88452_18.jpg

Women labourers work inside a cashew processing factory in Gakulnagar near the Indian city of Agartala [File: Reuters/Jayanta Dey]
 

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
15,812
Reputation
2,820
Daps
88,012
Being 'cool'
Working and eating "green" is, of course, accompanied by a certain lifestyle shaped by hipsterised aesthetics of "coolness" - be they vintage furniture, organic markets, tattoo parlours, or third wave coffee shops. But being "green" and "cool" often has a steep price-tag which directly reinforces classist divisions in society.

For this reason, the production of "coolness" in its myriad forms is a slippery slope and requires much deeper collective reflection on its consequences.

In theory, "coolness" just is. It is imbued with all the things that reflect deep relational values of care, affection, creativity, connection, authenticity, and meaning. It should have no racial, gendered or socio-economic boundaries and likewise, have no impact on those fronts either.

In practice, it involves the reproduction of a particular way of being which invariably sets in motion new avenues for capital to expand, allowing everything that has meaning to be hollowed-out and commodified for profit.

Returning to the example of the University of Montreal's new campus, the juxtaposition of the campus to Parc-Extension, as one of Canada's poorest and most culturally-diverse neighbourhoods, renders obvious the classist and racialised ways by which the emergence of "coolness" takes place.

Just who can extend particular aesthetics of hipness, eco-friendly chic and health-conscious consumption patterns is tightly associated with both class and inherited privilege to consume and waste more.

At the same time, it is these historically privileged individuals at the forefront of "coolness" that consciously or unconsciously accept the modern conceit of equating human progress with new forms of value to exploit for profit. In doing so, the violent ecological destruction and social displacement of the ensemble of humans and non-humans around the world which work to serve the forever unsatisfied aesthetics of the "cool" class become the unfortunate consequence.

What's potentially more problematic with the classist nature of green production and consumption is that urban hipsters pride themselves as being "woke" about sustainability issues, while simultaneously alienating the rural and overseas agricultural, peri-urban, and manufacturing classes, without whom"hip" lifestyles would not be possible.

Urban hipsters are quick to dismiss poorer classes as having no "green consciousness", for not living up to their expensive "green" standards,and failing to recognise the fact that opportunities to live "green" are limited in places that are economically disadvantaged and neglected by the authorities. They also tend to turn their backs on working-class political struggles for the fairer distribution of wealth and well-being across society.

On a global scale, capitalism is most certainly not "cool"… it is literally burning our planet. An aloof, detached, apolitical coolness which centres on individuality and imagery is simply not going to cut it any more.

Such lifestyles may appear marginally efficient, but they are, by and large, a convenient by-product of shifting social and ecological costs to those less privileged both locally and globally.

One way to move forward in a positive direction is to abandon a singular focus on lifestyle choice to focus resistance on externally-conceived and profit-driven developments as a moral and even survivalist imperative and work to re-establish community through solidarity economies, replenishing those relations severed by the growth-centred logic.

Material or energy dematerialisation is simply not enough. It must be accompanied by an economy built on care and responsibility, rather than profit, growth and self-interest if it is to have any long-term impact. This is a small but absolutely crucial step towards attaining the authentic desires for sustainability that many of us are so dearly committed to and which we so urgently need.


cb340ee32dd6445391c8a87036e0cc82_18.jpg

Residents of Parc-Extension fear gentrification could force them to leave the neighbourhood [Vijay Kolinjivadi/ Al Jazeera]



The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,191
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,223
Reppin
Brooklyn
The Hill
1 hr ·
The EPA is reportedly preparing to weaken a rule so that communities could no longer challenge the amount of pollution power plants in their area are allowed by the federal government to release into the environment.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

New EPA rule would stop citizens from challenging amount of pollution allowed in their communities
Changing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations could soon strip individuals and communities of the ability to challenge granted pollution permits while continuing to allow industry to appeal denials,
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,013
Reputation
5,982
Daps
92,027
Reppin
NULL
The Hill
1 hr ·
The EPA is reportedly preparing to weaken a rule so that communities could no longer challenge the amount of pollution power plants in their area are allowed by the federal government to release into the environment.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

New EPA rule would stop citizens from challenging amount of pollution allowed in their communities
Changing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations could soon strip individuals and communities of the ability to challenge granted pollution permits while continuing to allow industry to appeal denials,
Wow
 

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
15,812
Reputation
2,820
Daps
88,012
Unprecedented' wildfires ravage the Arctic
By Isabelle Gerretsen, CNN
Updated 8:21 AM EDT, Wed July 24, 2019
190724113610-wildfires-arctic-medium-plus-169.jpg

Story highlights

  • The wildfires come as the planet is on track to experience the hottest July on record
  • Wildfires contribute to global warming by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere


(CNN)More than 100 intense wildfires have ravaged the Arctic since June, with scientists describing the blazes as "unprecedented."

New satellite images show huge clouds of smoke billowing across uninhabited land in Greenland, Siberia and parts of Alaska.

The wildfires come after the planet experienced the hottest June on record and is on track to experience the hottest July on record, as heatwaves sweep across Europe and the United States.


Britain could see hottest night on record Tuesday as heat wave hits

Since the start of June, Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), which provides data about atmospheric composition and emissions, has tracked more than 100 intense wildfires in the Arctic Circle.

Pierre Markuse, a satellite photography expert, said the region has experienced fires in the past, but never this many.

190724131754-wildfires-arctic-2-medium-plus-169.jpg
Satellite images show smoke billowing across Greenland and Alaska as wildfires ravage the region.
Temperatures in the Arctic are rising at a faster rate than the global average, providing the right conditions for wildfires to spread, according to Mark Parrington, a senior scientist at CAMS.

"The number and intensity of wildfires in the Arctic Circle is unusual and unprecedented," Parrington told CNN.

"They are concerning as they are occurring in a very remote part of the world, and in an environment that many people would consider to be pristine," he said.

190627181007-europe-heatwave-thumbnail-super-169.jpg

The average June temperature in Siberia, where the fires are raging, was almost 10 degrees higher than the long-term average between 1981--2010, Dr Claudia Volosciuk, a scientist with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) told CNN.

Parrington said there seemed to be more wildfires due to local heatwaves in Siberia, Canada and Alaska.


California wildfires burn 500% more land because of climate change
The fires themselves contribute to the climate crisis by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

They emitted an estimated 100 megatons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere between 1 June and 21 July, almost the equivalent of Belgium's carbon output in 2017, according to CAMS.

Read more: Scientists memorialize the first glacier lost to climate change in Iceland

Volosciuk said wildfires are also exacerbating global warming by releasing pollutants into the atmosphere.

"When particles of smoke land on snow and ice, [they] cause the ice to absorb sunlight that it would otherwise reflect, and thereby accelerate the warming in the Arctic," she said
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,191
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,223
Reppin
Brooklyn
New
The Hill
4 hrs ·
BREAKING: Automakers Honda, Volkswagen, Ford and BMW of North America have struck a deal with California to produce vehicles that could average 50 mpg by 2026, undercutting efforts by the Trump administration to freeze them at 37 mpg in an effort to combat climate change.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

Top automakers defy Trump, strike major fuel efficiency deal with California
The proposed rollback from the Trump administration has set up a clash with California which, for decades, has been allowed to create its own stricter standard that has in turn been adopted by other states.


Awesome news and another L for dotard
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,006
Reputation
3,755
Daps
105,014
Reppin
Detroit
New
The Hill
4 hrs ·
BREAKING: Automakers Honda, Volkswagen, Ford and BMW of North America have struck a deal with California to produce vehicles that could average 50 mpg by 2026, undercutting efforts by the Trump administration to freeze them at 37 mpg in an effort to combat climate change.


About this website

THEHILL.COM

Top automakers defy Trump, strike major fuel efficiency deal with California
The proposed rollback from the Trump administration has set up a clash with California which, for decades, has been allowed to create its own stricter standard that has in turn been adopted by other states.


Awesome news and another L for dotard

:ehh: though I'll never understand why Republicans hate the idea of doing something about climate change so much
 
Top