BK The Great
Veteran
Not sure if posted
You think PA should be done by Friday? I read that they could count 70K a day, don’t know what’s taking so long.Biden is now up by 45,673 votes in Pennsylvania.
there are 44,800 votes left to count there.
its been over for a minute, but now its mathematically over
probably not. they're counting like 10,000 a day. they wont be done until maybe saturday or sunday.You think PA should be done by Friday? I read that they could count 70K a day, don’t know what’s taking so long.
Removing anyone who will stand in his wayUh what the hell is going on????
Aight so this is the new thing the Republicans are circulating.
They're trying to invalidate the Electoral Votes from California based on the following:
(d) A political party that participated in a primary election for a partisan office pursuant to subdivision (c) has the right to participate in the general election for that office and shall not be denied the ability to place on the general election ballot the candidate who received, at the primary election, the highest vote among that party’s candidates.
(Sec. 5 amended June 8, 2010, by Prop. 14. Res.Ch. 2, 2009. Operative Jan. 1, 2011.)
They're just throwing shyt to the wall, right?
Aight so this is the new thing the Republicans are circulating.
They're trying to invalidate the Electoral Votes from California based on the following:
(d) A political party that participated in a primary election for a partisan office pursuant to subdivision (c) has the right to participate in the general election for that office and shall not be denied the ability to place on the general election ballot the candidate who received, at the primary election, the highest vote among that party’s candidates.
(Sec. 5 amended June 8, 2010, by Prop. 14. Res.Ch. 2, 2009. Operative Jan. 1, 2011.)
They're just throwing shyt to the wall, right?
Aight so this is the new thing the Republicans are circulating.
They're trying to invalidate the Electoral Votes from California based on the following:
(d) A political party that participated in a primary election for a partisan office pursuant to subdivision (c) has the right to participate in the general election for that office and shall not be denied the ability to place on the general election ballot the candidate who received, at the primary election, the highest vote among that party’s candidates.
(Sec. 5 amended June 8, 2010, by Prop. 14. Res.Ch. 2, 2009. Operative Jan. 1, 2011.)
They're just throwing shyt to the wall, right?
Aight so this is the new thing the Republicans are circulating.
They're trying to invalidate the Electoral Votes from California based on the following:
(d) A political party that participated in a primary election for a partisan office pursuant to subdivision (c) has the right to participate in the general election for that office and shall not be denied the ability to place on the general election ballot the candidate who received, at the primary election, the highest vote among that party’s candidates.
(Sec. 5 amended June 8, 2010, by Prop. 14. Res.Ch. 2, 2009. Operative Jan. 1, 2011.)
They're just throwing shyt to the wall, right?