Official 2020 Democratic Primary Debate Thread

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
12,860
Reputation
1,413
Daps
39,004
Reppin
Central VA
yang's problem wasn't his debate ability. :mjtf:








trump ain't no bloomberg :comeon:


if warren did this to trump then trump will reply with 'maybe i should've grabbed your p*ssy instead' :wow:


and still get away with it:unimpressed:

Yeah there’s really no point in doing more than one debate. Trump’s numbers aren’t going to change cause he snorting like a cokehead or being “presidential” while saying nothing.
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,651
Reputation
5,242
Daps
63,536
Reppin
NYC
^ Good analysis.

I'm not sure how to call this one for Biden. He was no one's target, got in some clean shots of his own on Bloomberg (and even landed a few strays on Bernie), and was relatively coherent throughout and actually fiery at times. That might classify as a win for him, especially given the lowered expectations of late.

And yet...Mike wasn't really the guy he (and the rest of the centrists, FTM) needed to torch. That was Bernie, and while he connected on a few jabs, they didn't really make a dent. And the very fact that he wasn't attacked - really, he was all but ignored - shows he's not currently seen as a legit threat, which is even more concerning for him.

Fam, I feel you entirely. The debate basically showed how far Biden has fallen. He technically helped himself and got a boost from it, but at the same time the real story is probably that no one treated him as much of a threat or competition.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,233
Reputation
2,506
Daps
133,934

:mjlol: this argument is so stupid, so if a candidate runs the tables in NY/TEXAS/FLORIDA/CALI etc from a voter turnout standpoint but has by far less delegates he should win the nomination against someone like let's say bernie who is leading in delegates? You realize this can work both ways right :russ:. The argument is flawed and makes zero sense for the nomination process that has several different conceptual issues from state to state. You have caucuses that have viability rules, party rules, and all types of dumb shyt. How on earth would you even determine the winner :mjlol:. If you want to go straight popularity contest rules you should be urging the party to go straight winner takes all.
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,651
Reputation
5,242
Daps
63,536
Reppin
NYC
:mjlol: this argument is so stupid, so if a candidate runs the tables in NY/TEXAS/FLORIDA/CALI etc from a voter turnout standpoint but has by far less delegates he should win the nomination against someone like let's say bernie who is leading in delegates? You realize this can work both ways right :russ:. The argument is flawed and makes zero sense for the nomination process that has several different conceptual issues from state to state. You have caucuses that have viability rules, party rules, and all types of dumb shyt. How on earth would you even determine the winner :mjlol:. If you want to go straight popularity contest rules you should be urging the party to go straight winner takes all.

My dude the question was about whoever goes to the convention with the most DELEGATES not raw vote total.
 

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,299
Reputation
12,885
Daps
91,328
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
Bernie Bros already saying they gonna sit out if he loses. They’re not real Democrats :scust: Starting to hate them dudes.
There's a portion of Bernie supporters that won't vote for anyone else, but not if he loses....it's more like if he's fukked over and cheated out of a legit win.

He has the most support out of the field and they're not all 'Bernie Bros'. Plenty will vote for whoever the Democratic candidate is.
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,732
Reppin
Houston
Colin posters aren't real people. :hubie:

And if they were, they certainly wouldn't be swayed by twitter. :manny:


Nap been gone for a little over a week and now you centrist jokers have decided to come out and say all leftist posters are paid bots like we don’t have 4 years of team Nap pushing a paid agenda on here and y’all dapping him up:mjlol:
 

Cheddar Biscuits

Give Me Sight Beyond Sight
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
252
Reputation
30
Daps
1,456
Bernie Bros already saying they gonna sit out if he loses. They’re not real Democrats :scust: Starting to hate them dudes.
I got some bad news for you about the country you live in. Most people aren't Democrats. Or Republicans for that matter.
new-party-affiliation.png
If you want to lose another election and call everybody Bernie Bros that's on you, but putting out shytty candidates nobody likes and then whining when she loses is how you got yourself here in the first place.

And by the way, you know who those independents support, right?

Why Sanders Does Better With Independents
Sanders Crushes Trump by 18 Points Among Independent Voters in New National General Election Poll
New poll shows Bernie with another double-digit lead over Dem field
 

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,349
Reputation
1,855
Daps
62,178
Reppin
Everywhere
There's a portion of Bernie supporters that won't vote for anyone else, but not if he loses....it's more like if he's fukked over and cheated out of a legit win.

He has the most support out of the field and they're not all 'Bernie Bros'. Plenty will vote for whoever the Democratic candidate is.
If Bern loses straight up because some centrist blob came together under one candidate or Warren comes back then it is what it is. But if they pull some fukk shyt at the convention then the party is done regardless of the "bros."
 
Top