Obama's security dog named "Khan," Muslims outraged, issue threats, demand apology

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
The name Khan is not a Muslim name. It's not even Arabic. It's just a name that is popular among some Muslims because of their geographical location, not because of their religion. All it testifies to is that the (pagan) Mongols ran up on them at one point or another and conquered them, or that they themselves are descended from Mongols. You won't find Southeast Asian or North African Muslims named Khan. Plus, for the same reason, there are a lot of non-Muslims named Khan. And even among Muslims, it's used more as an ethnic designator than as a pan-Muslim name.

This kind of outrage is just needless sensitivity.
 

Pool_Shark

Can’t move with me in this digital space
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,575
Reputation
1,975
Daps
25,888
Why do you guys associate anything any muslim has said with ALL muslims are like this. Don't care one way or the other it's just there's so many muslims on Earth that of course a bunch of idiots slipped in.
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,291
Reppin
W/S 416
:snoop: Khan isn't even a Muslim name, it's a name with origins in peoples of central Asia. Muslims always try to claim any name, place, or land associated with people they conquered centuries ago as Islamic.

thats irrelevant, Khan in the south Asian context is associated with Muslims. Either this was a deliberate act, which is stupid, or an act of ignorance, which is stupid
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,291
Reppin
W/S 416
The name Khan is not a Muslim name. It's not even Arabic. It's just a name that is popular among some Muslims because of their geographical location, not because of their religion. All it testifies to is that the (pagan) Mongols ran up on them at one point or another and conquered them, or that they themselves are descended from Mongols. You won't find Southeast Asian or North African Muslims named Khan. Plus, for the same reason, there are a lot of non-Muslims named Khan. And even among Muslims, it's used more as an ethnic designator than as a pan-Muslim name.

This kind of outrage is just needless sensitivity.

again i disagree. Of coure Khan is a Mongol term, but in West, Central and South Asia it took root and today it is strictly associated with Muslims...especially in the South Asia context
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,177
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,203
Reppin
Brooklyn
thats irrelevant, Khan in the south Asian context is associated with Muslims. Either this was a deliberate act, which is stupid, or an act of ignorance, which is stupid

Why don't you go cut their heads off in retribution.


Spare me your fake outrage
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,982
Daps
132,705
thats irrelevant, Khan in the south Asian context is associated with Muslims. Either this was a deliberate act, which is stupid, or an act of ignorance, which is stupid

So any region of the world that Islam took over and there was a lasting predominant Muslim community established, we are to consider all those names Muslim names and the lands Muslim lands, and to name a dog with a central Asian surname is an affront to Islam, even though the name existed centuries before Islam was invented?
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
again i disagree. Of coure Khan is a Mongol term, but in West, Central and South Asia it took root and today it is strictly associated with Muslims...especially in the South Asia context

I wouldn't deny that, but again, why the needless sensitivity for something that only has a contingent association with Islam and was clearly not meant to offend anyone, and furthermore, doesn't directly blaspheme? It's not like someone named the dog Muhammad or Allah or something where I could see the direct offense perceived.
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,291
Reppin
W/S 416
I wouldn't deny that, but again, why the needless sensitivity for something that only has a contingent association with Islam and was clearly not meant to offend anyone, and furthermore, doesn't directly blaspheme? It's not like someone named the dog Muhammad or Allah or something where I could see the direct offense perceived.

take your pick:

1. muslims been getting azz fukked, and are traumatized over any slight

2. muslims have nothing better to do

3. local leaders sustain their positions of authority by whipping up crowds over this


So any region of the world that Islam took over and there was a lasting predominant Muslim community established, we are to consider all those names Muslim names and the lands Muslim lands, and to name a dog with a central Asian surname is an affront to Islam, even though the name existed centuries before Islam was invented?

no

im saying Khan in the south Asian context is associated with Muslims. Im not trying to have a greater conversation here. Im sticking to the subject.

Its actually more associated with Pashtuns then anything. South Asians call me Khan Saheb, as a term of endearment

Why don't you go cut their heads off in retribution.


Spare me your fake outrage

shut up you faccot, before i put bells on your feet
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
take your pick:

1. muslims been getting azz fukked, and are traumatized over any slight

2. muslims have nothing better to do

3. local leaders sustain their positions of authority by whipping up crowds over this

So 2 and 3 seem to be pretty much needless, which was pretty much my initial point that this is being needlessly hyped. The first point I think has some merit, but maybe less so in India, especially in a state with prominent Muslims politicians and representation for Muslims. It's not Gujarat where Hindu fundamentalist maniacs have turned the Muslim population into an open wound. In any case, I wouldn't see it that offense backed by the general context of Muslim trauma as outweighing the clearly innocuous case here.
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,291
Reppin
W/S 416
So 2 and 3 seem to be pretty much needless, which was pretty much my initial point that this is being needlessly hyped. The first point I think has some merit, but maybe less so in India, especially in a state with prominent Muslims politicians and representation for Muslims. It's not Gujarat where Hindu fundamentalist maniacs have turned the Muslim population into an open wound. In any case, I wouldn't see it that offense backed by the general context of Muslim trauma as outweighing the clearly innocuous case here.

well the hype is needless no doubt but i can understand why a slight was recognized. how one reacts to slights like this depends on the person
 

Ashtrey

Superstar
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
7,308
Reputation
1,699
Daps
22,739
i know a lot of south asians non muslims with the last name khan..

:deadhorse:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
word? what religion are they?

I've definitely heard of Sikhs with Khan in their name, though maybe not as a last name, and Hindus from the Northwest (Rajasthan,) where I was when I was in India. It seemed the same way with certain other Persian and Arabic names like Bahadur and Shah, which I had previously assumed were exclusively Muslim.
 
Top