nWo 2000 vs. nWo WWE: Which was worse?

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

The Band >>>NWO 2000

The Triple threat >>>>>> nWo 2000

 

[Tommy Fits]

Anything with jeff Jarrett is worse

 

[Fenian]

 

[MenacingMonk]

He tripped over Booker.

 

[Bob Loblaw]

Looking back wwe nwo was worse by a landslide

 

[Grifter]

If 2000 worked out would Jarrett never have risen in the ranks?

 

[Hostile]

nWo Poison. They seemed like your typical WWF stable and were . Hall didn't stick around long. Waltman was as annoying as ever. HBK did nothing. Big Show didn't fit in. Austin using politics to go over Hall at WM18 resulting in nWo looking weak as they all were getting mudholes stomped in them by that has-been.

They were supposed to be this dangerous group but Lesnar (who wasn't even there for two months) looked like he could hold his own with them when they had that confrontation.
Brock even made one of their biggest rivals think twice

 

[CM_Burns]

NWO WWE, from arrival to Wrestlemania 18, was a good angle. Yea, NWO wasn't booked quite like NWO WCW, but the story they told with Rock/Austin and leading to Hogan's face turn (which worked perfectly) was pretty good. After that it got really bad, but they had at least a solid month or so of decent NWO use.

NWO 2000 had Bret and Jeff Jarrett in front, two of the least NWO-ish guys ever.

 

[RammerJammer]

nWo 2000 is much much worse, that one month in 2002 of Hogan, Hall, and Nash was much better than 2000.

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

NWO WWE was trash due to the fact that the storyline revolved around Rock/Hogan. The poison wasn't injected at all, it was just meh when Hall got shytted on, Nash was just there, and Hogan was Hogan. Lets not forget HBKKK's involvement into the KKKliq.