[NSFW] Savage ass DC nikkas fukk a thot outside the club

[Hiphoplives4eva]

As usual on this site, we have a number of posters who are convicting people of crimes without any actual knowledge of the law. Y'all embarrass yourself accusing people of rape when y'all don't even know what constitutes rape. I hate that the term "rape" is thrown around so liberally, especially when there are serious ramifications for those accused of rape.

Rape is an individual's unconsented penetration of another. Depending on the situation, an individual under the influence of alcohol may not be able to give consent. In cases involving the use of alcohol by either party (or both), the prosecution/court will examine the cases on an case-by-case basis and pay close attention to specific details in order to make a determination of whether a rape occurred.

Here, there is no doubt that the female in the video consented to all of the sex acts in which she engaged. First, she's caught on video repeating that she loves having sex. Second, she willingly engaged in oral sex (even AFTER she said she didn't want to) and vaginal sex with each male. Also, she never said "no" or "stop" before or during sex at any point in the video. There were no statements of objection by her. Finally, there were no signs of physical resistance by her against the men at any of the respective times when a male penetrated her.

The fact that she was under the influence will ultimately mean nothing. First, there is no proof that any of the individuals either knew she was drunk. There is no proof that any individuals supplied her with any alcohol/drugs. Also, there is no proof that the female was even under the influence when she engaged in those acts. Moreover, even if it was proven that the female was in fact under the influence, the defendant(s) can argue that they were under the influence themselves (someone was caught with a marijuana blunt in the video) and, thus, that negates any idea that they were taking advantage of an intoxicated female' supposed inability to consent. In the totality of the situation, these points plus her behavior and statements in the video show that she voluntarily consented to having sex and that her (supposed) intoxication didn't impair her ability to consent.

In no way, shape, or form am I condoning the actions of any of the individuals in the video. All parties involved are disgusting and morally null individuals. However, the argument that the female was raped is legally deficient.

If the female has any ounce of regret, she'll file a rape charge. A reasonable prosecutor will, at the very least, be weary of prosecuting this incident as a rape case (or could very well refuse to prosecute it period). And if a rape case is prosecuted, a court will ultimately find that no rape occurred throughout the video. Unfortunately, however, once the rape charge is filed, the damage will have already been done and the reputation of everybody in the video will be irreversibly tarnished.

This is truly a disgusting and sad situation but this isn't rape.

YUP!

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

So sad. nikkas will throw their entire lives away over some p*ssy. I diagnosed a young handsome 30 year old black male with HIV the other day. One of the saddest things i have ever seen.

Motherfukker had bilateral pneumonia. Nearly died. All because his immune system was shyt.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

My final say on this: I wouldn't be surprised if there's a rape charge filed and those boys get arrested. But I'd be very surprised if they're convicted of rape.

There's too much going against her in the video for anybody to conclude that she was raped BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. She kept saying that she loves sex and that she wanted to be fukked. She voluntarily proceeded to have sex with multiple dudes. Her underwear was already off and thrown behind the car before the video started. The only time she said "no" was when she was repeatedly asked for brains by a dude. She said "no" and that dude ceased asking her. However, she then voluntarily gave head to another dude. Otherwise, she showed no signs or acts of resistance. She never said "no" and "stop" and continued to willingly have sex after that one time she said "no". She never ran or away or even appeared to try to escape the scene.

As for her intoxication, she likely was intoxicated (but we don't know for sure). And so were the dudes in the video. Plus, the boys can use the defense of plausible deniability. Moreover, they didn't intoxicate her nor encourage her to be intoxicated. The law of rape and intoxication is murky as hell but case law demonstrates that the main question for rape by intoxication is WHETHER THE VICTIM'S INTOXICATION IMPAIRED HER ABILITY TO CONSENT. Here, the girl clearly consented. So the analysis becomes whether her supposed intoxication impaired her from giving proper consent. This is where the law gets murky and the courts examine this on a case by case basis by examining the details and the totality of the circumstances. Based on everything I explained above, her consent will be found to be valid.

The boys will likely find themselves before court BUT will likely not be convicted.

Everybody who's screaming rape is either doing so based on emotion or inapplicable/improper law.

Exactly. The girl is clearly encouraging and happily participating in the activities. She was way too irresponsible in her actions. Surprised she even survived this. There are TONS of straight wolves out there.

 

[Medulla Oblongata]

@L&HH Add this to the OP:

http://www.xvideos.com/video1214645..._parking_lot_nsfw_18_years_-_world_star_uncut

 

[twhatever]

Does the woman accept any of the blame here?

No.
That's the point of impaired judgement.
Funny how supercoolp_cal is fine with resolutely saying "this is not rape",but his response to others saying,resolutely,that it is-"well,it's case by case whether this would be considered nonconsensual."

Bottom line,she has a shot if she were to report this.

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

No.
That's the point of impaired judgement.
Funny how supercoolp_cal is fine with resolutely saying "this is not rape",but his response to others saying,resolutely,that it is-"well,it's case by case whether this would be considered nonconsensual."

Bottom line,she has a shot if she were to report this.

You a female?

 

[Maddmike]

Who would fukk a random bytch like that....in d.c.....im willing to bet she burning with somthing

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

No.
That's the point of impaired judgement.
Funny how supercoolp_cal is fine with resolutely saying "this is not rape",but his response to others saying,resolutely,that it is-"well,it's case by case whether this would be considered nonconsensual."

Bottom line,she has a shot if she were to report this.

So using your logic the guys aren't responsible for their actions because they are drunk as well. Because once you drink alcohol, no one is responsible for any decision they make.

Or is it only men that are responsible for their actions irregardless of how drunk they are right?


I'm sure your own momma would disagree with your weak logic.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

Boy oh boy.... Wow... The technology age.... Not only is everything filmed but it is uploaded immediately without forethought and it is permanently there....

Jesus... All it takes is once to fukk up a lifetime...

He basically just uploaded a vid of his boy getting herpes in real time

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

shyt was disgusting brehs and I just as soon as I seen the new balance reflection and the helly hansen. These nikkas just asking for a charge. And that girl Nasty as shyt but I've seen shyt like this countless times in the city. Maybe not outside but joints going like this and nikkas making the best of the moment.

Spoiler

the ending herpes plot twist was early shamaylan Esque tho

that shyt definitely was a shamaylan Esque like plot twist . This shyt should be shown in sex ed

 

[twhatever]

So using your logic the guys aren't responsible for their actions because they are drunk as well. Because once you drink alcohol, no one is responsible for any decision they make.

Or is it only men that are responsible for their actions irregardless of how drunk they are right?


I'm sure your own momma would disagree with your weak logic.

They weren't drunk.She could hardly keep her balance.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

They weren't drunk.She could hardly keep her balance.

You have no idea what your talking about. Those dudes were clearly not in their right mind. Hell one was clearly smoking a blunt likely filled with marijuana. A known mind altering substance. Using your logic, they clearly weren't in their right mind, so they shouldn't be held responsible for their actions.


Or does that rule only apply to women?

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

He basically just uploaded a vid of his boy getting herpes in real time

Something he can show his future baby momma and his upcoming kids. I'm sure they'll be curious as to why they were born with various birth defects due to mommas raging herpes infection at the time of their birth.

Throw your life away over drunk parking lot puzzy brehs....

 

[KingTut]

When this broad appears on TV, in a long pantsuit, with that white lady lawyer that does all the rape cases, and starts spinning the story..

The lady you mentioned is Gloria Allred btw

 

[O.T.I.S.]

You have no idea what your talking about. Those dudes were clearly not in their right mind. Hell one was clearly smoking a blunt likely filled with marijuana. A known mind altering substance. Using your logic, they clearly weren't in their right mind, so they shouldn't be held responsible for their actions.


Or does that rule only apply to women?

But it's an illegal substance as well


Look.. I'm all for women being responsible for their actions and shyt, but there's NO WAY I would defend them nikkas in this situation.

- Not all of them were drunk and if they were high that doesn't help their case.

- She was clearly stumbling and bumbling around, slurring her words (they weren't), saying "no" to sucking dikk even though they ended up putting it in her mouth, etc.

- the recording has her saying no/stop multiple times... The fact that she even SAID it could get them fukked up

So as much as yall want to try to walk the line on whether it was consensual or not (you cannot legally consent to sex being intoxicated.. Idgaf what homie trying to say), who was more intoxicated than who, whether it was rape or not, etc... That shyt still doesn't look good for any of them nikkas going to court

Do yall actually believe a prosecutor, judge, and a jury is going to be so lenient and on the fence about this as you are