Two slam winners and one of the most talented players in the history of tennis?Federer won most of his slams when his main competetion was Andy Roddikk, Lleyton Hewitt and David Nalbandian![]()

Two slam winners and one of the most talented players in the history of tennis?Federer won most of his slams when his main competetion was Andy Roddikk, Lleyton Hewitt and David Nalbandian![]()
That's half-true. Federer should have been the GOAT, but was a mental midget in too many critical games. Djoke and Nadal had more mental toughness.
? Davydenko, Ljubičić, etc. were classes of players who could knock Djokovic out. Did Djoke play prime Pim Pim? (He did, but that was a nasty player) Did you watch the whole era?Novak is literally the first person to win every important tournament (all Grand Slams, all Masters, ATP Finals, Olympics), won the most Grand Slams and spent the most time at #1
yet people still want to bring up Federer, who padded his totals against Mardy Fish and May Mirnyi type players![]()
No, Federer is my favorite player of all time. He is not mentally as strong as Djokovic or Nadal. That's a fact. He'd have the slam record otherwise."Mental Midget" aka he was getting old. Federer was so great, ya'll assumed a 38/39 year old Federer should be on a level playing field against someone in their prime
Federer won most of his slams when his main competetion was Andy Roddikk, Lleyton Hewitt and David Nalbandian![]()
This is a rubbish argument breh period
Please look up who Federer won his first 5 slams against, he didn't beat either Djokovic or Nadal.
Ageing Nadal who is a year older? Aging Warwrinka who is two years older?
Federer isn't even #2 in the era let alone the best![]()
No, Federer is my favorite player of all time. He is not mentally as strong as Djokovic or Nadal. That's a fact. He'd have the slam record otherwise.
It can definitely be toppedFederer competed and beat
Agassi
Sampras
Goran ivanisevic
Carlos Moya
Lleyton Hewit
Roddikk
Marat Safin
Del Petro
Wawrinka
Djokovic
Nadal
Plus majority of Nadal and Djokovic's opponents
Sorry, that resume can't be topped
If you want to prop up Djokovic for beating up on a down era of aging hall of famers and the next Gen players full of underachievers, then have at it
Weren't they old when fed beat them?Agassi
Sampras
That was never a thing with Nadal. It was with Djoke, but at the beginning of his career. I remember him punking out vs. Monfils at the French in 2005 or 2006, and doing that shyt. Djokovic doesn't do that anymore.Get the fukk out of here. Both Djokovic and Nadal were/are known for quitting in matches that they knew they were losing. You can never say that about Federer. How many "injury timeouts" and "injury retirements" did we see from those two. Can't take anyone seriously whoever doesn't acknowledge that
True, but some of those were for his breathing.That was never a thing with Nadal. It was with Djoke, but at the beginning of his career. I remember him punking out vs. Monfils at the French in 2005 or 2006, and doing that shyt. Djokovic doesn't do that anymore.
breh is really listing 90s players who were either retired by 2003 (when Federer started winning slams) or in their mid 30sFederer competed and beat
Agassi
Sampras
Goran ivanisevic
Carlos Moya
Lleyton Hewit
Roddikk
Marat Safin
Del Petro
Wawrinka
Djokovic
Nadal
Plus majority of Nadal and Djokovic's opponents
Sorry, that resume can't be topped
If you want to prop up Djokovic for beating up on a down era of aging hall of famers and the next Gen players full of underachievers, then have at it
Weren't they old when fed beat them?
breh is really listing 90s players who were either retired by 2003 (when Federer started winning slams) or in their mid 30s![]()
No don't flip this on us. You brought it up first , we're exposing the hypocrisyI'm so glad ya'll brought this up
So you don't give Federer credit for beating an aging version of Agassi and Sampras. But you give Djokovic credit for beating an aging version of Federer and Nadal. Interesting![]()