North Korea Thread: DPRK Launching Missiles With New ICBM
- Thread starter newarkhiphop
- Start date
Futuristic Eskimo
All Star
Not to say that this is the case here, but the terms of some of these loans that China has made in other areas of the world have been quite onerous to the point where countries would be much better off without the initial cost injection. Is that not the case?
Man, Nap is a dikk riding fakkit when it comes to imperialist nations.
He prefers might over right any day of the week.
You are right, most poor nations would benefit from a relationship with China more than the West.
The west had been nothing but a parasite in its relationship with developing countries. Atleast with China, you can see actual development in respect to infrastructure and unlike hypocritical America, they are agnostic to a country’s politics.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
The New York Times
5 hrs ·
American troops in Seoul said they are still moving ahead with a military exercise this fall until they receive guidance otherwise from the chain of command.
NYTIMES.COM
Trump Pledge to Halt Military Exercises Surprises Pentagon and Seoul
Nobody says they are and they don’t pretend to be.
Much more than I can say about “spreading democracy”, getting rid of “Evil Doers” bullshyt America likes to peddle.
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
The New York Times
5 hrs ·
American troops in Seoul said they are still moving ahead with a military exercise this fall until they receive guidance otherwise from the chain of command.
NYTIMES.COM
Trump Pledge to Halt Military Exercises Surprises Pentagon and Seoul
Of course because Trump doesn't have the juice to tell the military what to do...even though he's the "commander" in cheif.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
It's never discussed and the larger context is ignored by most people especially on forums.
That's a really pointless and cynical argument.
The US has contributed to the increase in life expectancy and quality of life around the world to countless people by their contributions to the UN and aid agencies.
It's also ridiculous to pigeon hole one administration into Americas foreign policy at large.
Last edited:
Maybe the non profit stuff made a difference, but that's nothing compared to the destabilization caused by the west, particularly the U.S, in South America and the Caribbean, the Middle East and Africa.
They abandoned morals that they claimed to have in order to defeat the soviet union. That's why it's laughable to hear the U.S talk about human rights, when they have backed some of the gulliest regimes ever.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Last edited:
Futuristic Eskimo
All Star
The Soviets, the other alternative, were worse. At this point, there is very little reason to comment on hypocritical rhetoric made by politicians regarding human rights, as real decision-making is based on furtherance of one's interests.
Outside of making the same easy comment about how much hypocrisy the US displays, what were and what are the preferable alternatives?
You mean the Chinese nations that they dont even use local labor for?
Get over yourself.
The highway they built in Jamaica has to be RE DONE because the Chinese skimped on it.
Don't you fukking dare tell me the value of Chinese investment in poor countries.
America has held the line on more human rights abuses than any other country.
Get that zero-sum shyt outta here. Diplomacy is hard, and coaching from the sidelines isn't.