I'm assuming
@MartyMcFly assumed you were one of the dudes I had on ignore, cause I never named who I have on ignore but have said it was nikkas that went overboard with the stan shyt while brining nothing else of note to any other discussions. Trust me, I've already forgotten the cats I've put on ignore and I certainly wouldn't un-ignore someone.
The framing of the movies being comical is me saying they did a bad job at what they were going for. If the dude actually making the movie says the movie is a certain thing, who are either one of us to tell him he's wrong? I can name a bunch of comic book films that aren't action movies. I think you guys underestimate just how many movies are comic adaptations. Spawn could easily fall under the horror genre. Watchmen is not an action movie. Road to Perdition...you see where I'm going here. Superhero film is a genre, but then you have a movie like Unbreakable, which again, is not action.
Like I said in my very first post in here, Marvel movies are what they are. I'm not mad at it. With that said, comics and manga aren't solely childish stories. A History of Violence was a graphic novel before it was adapted to a movie that ended up getting rave reviews and Oscar nominations. Akira isn't for kids. Same for Oldboy. So people aren't being unreasonable to expect great things from comic book movies. Just because Marvel is one way does not mean everything else has to be that way. Yet I have to hear complaints about other movies being "humorless" and not "fun". I'm an adult, I can handle serious stuff.
So now the argument is nobody criticizes anything DC does?
![mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mjlol.png)
![mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mjlol.png)
Suicide Squad sucked, btw