badvillain
Rookie
So letting the people in Syria die could be morally right if we view those involved as "sovereign nations" rather than innocent human beings...?
Now if you are saying its for the greater good, you are probably right, but its still f*cked up. Especially if chemical weapons are being used.
Well hold up, I'm not condoning any type of death; but how are cruise missiles an answer to the death already happening? And those same cruise missiles could be the catalyst to death all over the globe. There's no way we could instead help civilians escape and seek refugee from the conflict, rather than stirring the pot of hatred and anger?
Domestically, the US has practically abolished due process and has replaced it with a new ideology of "guilty until proven innocent." It hasn't been proven who used those chemical weapons, and inflicting more death over circumstantial evidence seems hardly "morally right". And if it ever comes out that it was the rebels that used chemical weapons with the help of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the C.I.A; then the last thing to do is use tomahawks that would then tip the civil war in the favor of the rebels.