nikkaWhat i compared is the government making moves that clearly contradict other moves.
Similar to the war on drugs
Similar to them using Osama to go at people they didn't care for THEN making him public enemy #1.
There's countless examples.
Like i said the government is not above contradictory moves so why make that argument? When you're CLEARLY WRONG.
Noone in the government put a hit on no damn Nipsey.
Usually when an arm of the government kills black men, its usually police.
In this case, it was a crip. So no.
Government dont need to pay gangbanger to kill another gangbanger when they do it for free all the time.
Last but not least you still acting like there wasnt witnesses, acting like this wasnt an emotional killing versus a hit, and acting like a weirdo conspiracy guy.
Let me show you what a real hit looks like
Last edited: